konane's Blog

Impeachment? Bring it on. Trump can put the Dems on trial in the Senate

Impeachment? Bring it on. Trump can put the Dems on trial in the Senate

".... Here is the most important benefit of this broad and aggressive approach to the president's defense: in confronting all those who have ceaselessly sought to reverse the 2016 election, President Trump's legal team this time will have a critical tool thus far denied them: the power to subpoena any and all persons, including all those who were elbow-deep in the Russia collusion hoax.  Unlike during the feeble and tedious investigation conducted by the Washington elite's chosen operative, Robert Mueller, every single such person will be sworn and aggressively, publicly interrogated under penalty of perjury, by formidable trial counsel. ...."

www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/impeachment_bring_it_on_trump_can_put_the_dems_on_trial_in_the_senate.html

Entry #5,960

New Docs Contradict Biden Claim That Fired Ukrainian Prosecutor Was Corrupt

Article has several embedded links to documentation. 

New Docs Contradict Biden Claim That Fired Ukrainian Prosecutor Was Corrupt

"Biden infamously  bragged about threatening to withhold $1 billion  in US loan guarantees unless Ukraine's previous government immediately fired Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin - who was leading a wide-ranging corruption probe into Burisma Holdings; a Ukrainian oil and gas firm which paid Hunter Biden $50,000 per month to sit on its board. 

In a  sworn affidavit, Shokin says "I was forced out because I was leading a wide-range corruption probe into Burisma Holdings, a natural gas firm active in Ukraine, and Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, was a member of the board of directors."

And according to Solomon, "Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative."  .......

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new-docs-contradict-biden-claim-fired-ukrainian-prosecutor-was-corrupt

Entry #5,956

Intel Community Quietly Scrapped Requirement For "First-Hand Knowledge" Before CIA 'Rumorblower' Rel

Looks like they rewrite rules to suit their agenda. It is my understanding that a court of law does not permit rumor or hearsay as evidence, then why is this being permitted?

Intel Community Quietly Scrapped Requirement For "First-Hand Knowledge" Before CIA 'Rumorblower' Relied On Hearsay

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/intel-community-quietly-scrapped-requirement-first-hand-knowledge-cia-rumorblower-relied

Entry #5,955