truesee's Blog

Lottery purchasing service shuts down in Florida after one month

Lottery purchasing service shuts down in Florida after one month

 
Gary Taylor
Orlando Sentinel

5:29 p.m. EST

November 21, 2011

 
About a month after it launched in Florida, LottoGopher has pulled the plug.

LottoGopher began more than a year ago in California and last month started selling Powerball tickets in Florida with plans to expand to other Florida Lottery games such as Lotto and Fantasy 5.

It immediately drew the ire of gambling opponents because, for the first time, it provided the opportunity to use credit cards to purchase lottery tickets.

It was only after the Florida Lottery went to court Friday to force LottoGopher to quit operating in the state that the company's chief executive officer, James Morel, learned it is illegal in Florida to redeem a lottery ticket on behalf of someone else.
He shut down operations in Florida over the weekend.

"There's no way we could operate with that in place," Morel said.

In California, Morel started by selling Mega Millions tickets and then expanded to offer other games of the California Lottery.

He had expected to do the same in Florida, starting with Powerball and adding other Florida Lottery games. Morel said he got around laws that prevent the sale of lottery tickets over the Internet by operating as a messenger service.

He said the tickets never belonged to LottoGopher.

The monthly fee was $19.42 but was reduced to just $9.99 a month if paid a year in advance. LottoGopher did not take a percentage of the winnings.

The service also allowed players to pool their tickets with other players to increase their chances of winning. Up to 100 tickets can be pooled in an existing LottoGopher group or a private pool created by players.

Allowing tickets to be bought with credit cards here was controversial. Credit cards were required to use LottoGopher in order to both prove that the buyer was of legal age and was in Florida because there are laws against gambling across state lines, Morel said.
Entry #6,053

Study: Beer Is Good For You

Study: Beer Is Good For You

Reduces Risk Of Cardiovascular Disease Significantly

 

WILLIAM WEIR

The Hartford Courant

5:19 PM EST, November 18, 2011

 

We always hear about how moderate wine-drinking is good for you. What about beer?

Turns out beer is good for you, too, a new study tells us — maybe even better than wine. In moderation.

Conducted at the Research Laboratories at the Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura "Giovanni Paolo II" in Campobasso, Italy, the study examined data concerning the alcohol-drinking habits of more than 200,000 people and their relation with cardiovascular disease. The study is published in the most recent issue of the European Journal of Epidemiology: http://bit.ly/snSv2A (abstract only).

The researchers found that beer reduced the risk of cardiovascular disease by up to 42 percent; the wine study they compared it to had shown a risk reduction of 31 percent.

Portions, though, play a big part. Maximum health benefits come from drinking a little more than 1 pint per day of beer with a 5 percent alcohol content.

The next question is: Why would this be? The researchers don't know how much of a role the alcohol plays vs. other ingredients. Many of the wine-is-good-for-you studies tout the presences of resveratrol, a chemical found in grapes.

Beer doesn't have resveratrol, the researchers say, but it does have other polyphenols that may be healthful.

Entry #6,050

Principal resigns over sexting

Lake Forest principal who 'sexted' resigns

 

Lisa Black

Tribune reporter

8:36 PM CST, November 20, 2011

 

A Lake Forest middle school principal resigned today in response to controversy over how the district handled his use of a work cellphone to send vulgar, harassing messages to a 22-year-old college student.

Parents only recently became aware that Deer Path Middle School Principal John Steinert, 40, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor harassment through electronic communications in May 2009, after a Tribune report described police and court records.

As a result, Lake Forest School District 67 officials re-examined the case by viewing a completed police report that they said they had not seen before. The report showed that Steinert repeatedly sent sexually explicit messages, as well as a photograph of his penis, to the young woman after she ignored him or told him to stop.

At the time, the district wrote a letter admonishing the principal, ordered him to counseling, confiscated his cellphone and temporarily froze his salary. But the district expanded his job duties and gave him a bonus within the next year, officials said.

On Friday, Superintendent Harry Griffith announced that he planned to recommend Steinert’s dismissal during a special closed-door school board meeting today. Steinert instead offered his resignation, which was accepted by the board at its meeting.

The board met for two hours before approving Steinert's resignation in a 6-0 vote and recommending a review and strengthening of policies, including those concerning employees who are accused of criminal behavior, harassment and the proper use of social media. The board will recommend the suspension of the school resource police officer program, and establish a task force that includes community members to review policies.

The college student met Steinert after visiting the school at least 10 times while shadowing a police resource officer stationed at the school.

Board members will vote on those recommendations during its Nov. 29 meeting. Steinert will not receive any compensation beyond his paycheck as of Friday, Griffith said.

 "I can tell you that we didn’t even make a request for severance, for a buyout, or for additional insurance,” said Steinert’s lawyer, Brian Schwartz. “He just felt to help the kids, to help the school district and the community get past this, it was the right thing to do to submit his letter of resignation.”

About 20 residents attended Sunday’s meeting, with several demanding the resignation of Griffith and the board members who served in 2009.

“I know you are going to do the right thing regarding the principal so I am not concerned about the principal,” said Jerry Tunney, a retired principal who has lived in Lake Forest since 1966. “I am concerned about your handling of the superintendent’s contract. You will provide for him an unbelievable golden parachute. Is that parachute still packed? Is it ready to be presented to him this spring when he retires?”

Chris Munns, also a resident who is a principal in Chicago Public Schools, said she was disgusted when she came home from work to learn her 10 and 11-year-old children talking about the principal.

“My children knew exactly what had happened to their principal. No adult had spoken to my children,” Munns said. “No social worker had talked to them...  they are talking about it in the hallways. They are talking about it in the classrooms. “Shame on you, Harry Griffith. You had a chance to handle this two years ago and you didn’t.”

Michael Beacham, a parent, said the district needs new leadership.

“I don’t think we need a task force. I think we need leadership. Dr. Griffith, a true leader in this situation would have done more in 2009. A true leader would resign,” Beacham said. “And board members, I’m embarrassed to call you my school board members. You shouldn't have given Dr. Griffith the ability to resign. You should have demanded it.”

When asked if the board has asked for Griffith's resignation, President Julia Wold said it hadn’t done so. Wold also said that she does not intend to resign.

The subject of Steinert’s harassment was a student at Lake Forest College who was serving an internship with the Lake Forest police department at the time. She filed her complaint against Steinert in January 2009 with police in Gurnee, where she lived.

On Monday, the Lake Forest City Council is expected to call for an investigation into allegations that the school resource officer also made inappropriate sexually explicit remarks to the woman during her internship. That officer was not charged or suspected of any criminal wrongdoing, according to Gurnee police.

But when Gurnee police contacted Lake Forest Police Chief Joseph Buerger in early 2009 and told him that the officer was mentioned in the report, Buerger did not investigate, Lake Forest officials confirmed this week.

Many District 67 parents have expressed outrage over the revelations, questioning why school officials and local police failed to seek more information in 2009.
Griffith has previously said that a district employee interviewed Steinert “multiple times” after he was arrested. School officials did not interview the victim because she was not a district employee and the case did not involve minors, he said.

According to Gurnee police, Steinert admitted that he sent the intern text messages from May 2008 to January 2009. Some included graphic references to specific sexual acts.

The State Board of Education, also prompted by questions from the Tribune, opened an investigation Thursday into whether Steinert's education certificate should be suspended or revoked based on his conduct, an agency spokeswoman said.

 

 

LINK TO ORIGINAL STORY WITH PHOTO:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/ct-met-suburban-middle-school-20111118,0,5739675.story

Entry #6,049

Police roll out a giant tank to deal with a dozen Occupy protesters

Battlefield Tampa

Police roll out a giant tank to deal with a few dozen Occupy protesters

 

Image

 

Police say Tampa's tanks can also be used for search and rescue to anti-terror efforts.

 

Seth Millstein

Saturday, November 19, 2011

It’s understandable that Tampa, Fla., police felt the need to prepare for violence at an Occupy Tampa protest. But was a tank really necessary?

A picture from Thursday’s demonstration, posted to Twitter yesterday by the hacking group Anonymous, shows what is now included in the arsenals of many police departments around the country: a massive “armored personnel carrier.” Or, in laymen’s terms, a tank.

The police department’s website refers to Tampa’s big blue vehicle, complete with logos of “our sponsors,” as “virtually unstoppable.”

Entry #6,047