truesee's Blog

Obama: Mr. Incredible

Obama: Mr. Incredible

David Keene 

The Hill

07/19/10 05:34 PM ET

 

During the healthcare debate, President Obama and his operatives assured congressional Democrats and the media that once Obama-Care passed, all would be well. The president himself said the GOP focus on process would be forgotten quickly by a public far more interested in “policy than process.”

However, the public has made it clear it likes neither the product (about which more is being learned by the day) nor the process that led to passage. Many of the deals needed to piece together majorities in the House and Senate received enough publicity at the time to outrage many, but as time goes on revelations about additional concessions made to woo votes are justifying what were dismissed as simple partisan attacks during the debate.

Moreover, the possible consequences of the bill are making many wake up and take note.

When critics of the legislation alleged during the debate that the enforcement of its many provisions would vastly increase the power of the IRS and empower tax collectors to go where they had never gone before, administration spokesmen reacted in outrage. The president’s critics, they charged, were not just wrong, but lying to scare people.

It turns out that the critics were dead right and that if there was any lying going on, they weren’t the guilty ones. In the days since passage, we have learned that the IRS will have to hire literally thousands of new agents, auditors and analysts to make sure everyone required to buy into the program does so and to catch those who violate its many provisions as well as to collect the data that will be required of small businesses to help the government collect new taxes to pay for the scheme.

The result is that small-business owners who were promised they would benefit from the new law are up in arms as they discover that they will in fact be targets of an IRS planning to impose even more regulations on the way they operate. The absolute ludicrousness of the new requirements is that business owners will apparently now be required to file forms reporting on aggregate annual payments of as little as $600 to “vendors” like Staples or the office coffee supplier.

Meanwhile, it turns out that while some members of Congress were being promised one thing in return for their votes, others were being assured that such promises would never be kept. Thus, while members concerned about whether benefits would be extended to illegal immigrants were assured that this would not be the case, members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus in the House were being told that they shouldn’t worry about any restrictions in the healthcare bill because they would be removed later … in the administration’s promised immigration reform bill.

Recent news reports that Democratic leaders promised Hispanic Caucus members that provisions inserted in the healthcare to win the votes of others would be removed later suggest that South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson’s (R) charge that President Obama’s denial that the healthcare bill would cover illegal aliens was a lie was dead on.

The healthcare bill as passed and signed into law prohibits illegals from buying into the so-called healthcare exchanges that will be established under the law and denies even temporary legal immigrants access to Medicaid unless they’ve been here for five years. Hispanic Caucus leaders are now charging that the administration specifically promised to eliminate these and other restrictions and are vowing to hold the president and congressional Democratic leaders to that promise.

Under the Obama plan, of course, Medicaid has been expanded and something like half of all illegals in the country would qualify if the restrictions written into the law are removed, increasing the costs of a program that is already expected to exceed the estimates publicized by the administration before its passage by tens of billions of dollars.

The monetary cost of delivering on this promise would be enormous, but the political cost could be even higher. President Obama gives pretty good speeches, but fewer and fewer Americans are paying much attention to what he says. Some are beginning to ignore him for lack of follow-through or because he’s overexposed, but increasing numbers of those who were initially shocked by Wilson’s outburst are becoming convinced that he was right. 

A president’s credibility is key to his success. When those he deals with in Washington or those on whose votes he relies for reelection conclude that his word isn’t worth much, his ability to lead vanishes.

Keene is chairman of the American Conservative Union and a managing associate with the Carmen Group, a Washington-based governmental consulting firm.

Entry #2,755

Senate Dems spent $26,000 in Albany restaurants over 6 months

Senate Democrats bulk up for election fight by spending $26,000 in Albany restaurants over 6 months

Glenn Blain
DAILY NEWS ALBANY BUREAU

 

Tuesday, July 20th 2010, 9:59 PM

 

The NY State Capitol Building.

Benjamin for News, Martin, FreelThe NY State Capitol Building.

ALBANY - Senate Democrats must be really hungry for victory. 

The Senate Dems' campaign committee spent a whopping $26,000 on restaurants during the past six months, according to recently filed financial statements. 

"They're all associated with political and fund-raising meetings," insisted group spokesman Eric Blankenbaker.
He declined to offer specifics about any of the meetings. 

The Democrats held nearly 80 such "meetings" at dozens of restaurants across the state, including three stops at Jack's Oyster House - a fixture among Albany's power players - costing from $192 to $644, and four visits to Amber Japanese on Columbus Circle, where they rang up a $1,218 tab in just one visit. 

Democrats also satisfied their political appetites at the Ricardo Steak House, which bills itself at "The New Oasis in Harlem," Les Halles, a "typical Parisian brasserie" on Park Ave. in Manhattan, and Café Luxembourg on the upper West Side. 

The restaurant binge comes as Senate Democrats bulk up for what promises to be a bruising battle to retain their slim one-seat majority. 

Republicans, by comparison, seemed content to stay at a leaner fighting weight. They billed their campaign committee for only about 20 restaurant visits, costing about $3,200. 

"While they raised taxes and created hardship for working families, they obviously treated themselves very well," said Senate GOP spokesman Scott Reif.

 



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/07/20/2010-07-20_senate_democrats_bulk_up_for_election_fight_by_spending_26000_in_albany_restaura.html#ixzz0uJhTUcUf

Entry #2,754

The Big Question: Should Republicans join Tea Party caucus?

THE HILLThe Big Question: Should Republicans join Tea Party caucus?

Sydelle Moore
07/20/10 12:52 PM ET

Some of the nation's top political commentators, legislators and intellectuals offer insight into the biggest question burning up the blogosphere today.

Today's question:

Would it be a good political move for House Republicans to join the new Tea Party caucus? Why or why not?

 


Bernie Quigley, Pundits Blog Contributor, said:
No. As one who had a hand in the origins of Tea Party sensibilities in New Hampshire, I would say there should no longer be a Tea Party. It has done its job, and it did a good job. It opened a door, and it will not be closed. Tea Party guys, Rand Paul in particular, are largely Libertarian purists in their true nature. They tend to gather in small autonomous groups to practice the Old Time Religion in its purity. Today, we have Judge Andrew Napolitano bringing to millions via Fox the same ideas that a few hundred shared on Libertarian websites five years ago. It would be better that the thinking behind Tea Party — especially Hayek and state sovereignty — metabolize into the mainstream where the Judge brings it rather than lock itself into a box. Politicians such as South Carolina’s Nikki Haley, who is the Republican candidate for governor, Sarah Palin and Rick Perry, governor of Texas, bring the complexity of Tea Party issues to the mainstream.  As an organic model of organization, one could look to the Newport Folk Festival that brought Bob Dylan and Joan Baez to the mainstream. Had they remained loyal to their folk roots in the provincial world of folk music their generation would never had awakened.


Bruce E. Gronbeck, professor of Political Communication at the University of Iowa, said:
That would be a backward move. Pushing indoor politics into the out-of-doors and expecting leadership and discipline is courting disaster. Just think about the '68 Democratic convention in Chicago. The Democrats didn't recover until the Watergate scandal. And even then, the party didn't get fully reorganized until the early '90s. The GOP has to do its work the other way around, courting Tea Party members as voters, maybe even giving some a place on the RNC and on some campaign staffs.


John F. McManus, president of The John Birch Society, said:
House Republicans don't need to join the Tea Party Caucus. They already have the support of practically all Tea Party members.
 
House Republicans (and Senate Republicans, too) should be careful not to upset Tea Party partisans by adopting positions that are too liberal, or too neoconservative (socialist and internationalist). While Tea Party support can be assured for most Republicans, it should not be taken for granted.
 
Of course, every voter should be aware that campaign oratory is not always matched by performance once someone gets elected. There is no substitute for an informed electorate, and this includes keeping watch over any elected official and letting one's voice be heard once the election is over. 

 

 

Source:
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/109799-the-big-question-should-house-republicans-join-the-tea-party-caucus

Entry #2,753

Lohan reports to jail for probation violation

Lohan reports to jail for probation violation

Associated Press - 210 pm 

 

Story photo: Lohan reports to jail for probation violation

Lindsay Lohan is shown in a court, Tuesday, July 20, 2010, in Beverly Hills, Calif., where she was taken into custody to serve a jail sentence for probation violation. (AP Photo/Al Seib, pool)

 

Associated Press

LYNWOOD, Calif. - Whisked away to a women's jail in an unmarked sheriff's car after a brief hearing, Lindsay Lohan reported Tuesday for a 90-day sentence that the troubled actress likely will serve in isolation, and which may be significantly shortened.

Wearing dark denim jeans, a gray top, black corset belt and black jacket, the 24-year-old Lohan showed up at the Beverly Hills courtroom about 10 minutes late. After a short hearing, she rose and was handcuffed behind her back to serve her time for a probation violation.

Lohan was accompanied to court by her mother, Dina, and younger sister Ali, who wiped away tears after her sister was taken into a lockup.

Her estranged father, Michael Lohan, yelled, "We love you Lindsay!" as his daughter was led away. She was then taken across town to the Century Regional Detention Facility in the industrial suburb of Lynwood.

In court, Lohan was represented by her longtime attorney, Shawn Chapman Holley, who had resigned earlier but never filed a formal motion with the court. Famed celebrity attorney Robert Shapiro said Friday that he had agreed to represent the actress, but Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Marsha Revel said Tuesday that he had told her hours earlier that he would not take the case.

Holley said after the hearing that Lohan had decided she did not want Shapiro to represent her.

"She's stepped up, she's accepted responsibility," Holley said of her client. "She's scared as anyone would be, but she's as resolute and she's doing it."

Prosecutor Danette Meyers said she thought Lohan was receiving the appropriate sentence. She said the case, which is atypical for the attention it receives, spotlighted that drunken driving is a serious offense with consequences. "Someone can get killed," Meyers said. "Hopefully it has opened a number of eyes."

While the judge did not address Lohan's tardiness Tuesday directly, she did order her to report to probation officials within a day of her release from jail. The judge had previously ordered Lohan to report within two days.

Revel also has ordered officials not to allow Lohan to serve any of her sentence on house arrest or work release.

Two weeks ago the judge determined that the "Mean Girls" star violated her probation by missing seven alcohol education classes since December. She had been on probation since August 2007 after pleading guilty to misdemeanor drug charges and no contest to three driving charges.

Lohan, a prolific user of the microblogging site Twitter, posted a message roughly 12 hours before her court appearance referencing her looming incarceration.

"The only 'bookings' that I'm familiar with are Disney Films, never thought that I'd be 'booking' into jail eeeks," Lohan posted.

The jail and rehab stints have left some of the actress' projects in limbo, including her planned portrayal of porn star Linda Lovelace in a biopic.

Once considered an up-and-coming star, Lohan has in recent years been better-known as a tabloid staple and for the criminal case she has struggled to put behind her.

Her probation had to be extended for a year to give Lohan more time to complete her alcohol education courses and Revel ordered weekly attendance in December. But the actress didn't complete the sessions as ordered and missed a court date in May, setting a stage for her return to jail.

She is expected to serve her time — probably a quarter of her sentence or less — in isolation at a women's jail in the industrial suburb of Lynwood. The facility has hosted several female celebrities, including Paris Hilton, Nicole Richi, Michelle Rodriguez, Khloe Kardashian and very briefly, Lohan.

She will be forced to wear a jail-issued jumpsuit and be given a set of simple toiletries that all inmates receive: toothbrush, toothpaste, soap, comb, deodorant, shampoo and shaving implements. Hilton received one for her own secluded 23-day stay in 2007 for reckless driving charges.

___

McCartney reported from Beverly Hills. AP Special Correspondent Linda Deutsch contributed to this report.

Entry #2,751

Third pleads guilty in Obama loan case

July 20, 2010

Third pleads guilty in Obama loan case

The Associated Press

DES MOINES -- A third former employee of a U.S Department of Education contractor has pleaded guilty to illegally accessing President Obama's student loan records.

Patrick Roan, 51, of Iowa City, pleaded guilty in federal court July 13 to one count of fraud activity connected with computers, a misdemeanor. It wasn't immediately clear what maximum punishment he could face when he is sentenced Oct. 12.

Neither Roan's attorney, Rockne Cole, nor a U.S. attorney's office spokesman immediately responded to messages seeking comment.

Roan was one of nine Vangent Inc. employees accused of accessing Obama's student loan records. Two others pleaded guilty last month to a charge of exceeding authorized computer access and face up to a year in prison and $100,000 fine at their Sept. 24 sentencing.

The other six former employees have pleaded not guilty and are scheduled to stand trial in August and September. Prosecutors say the nine accessed Obama's records between July 2007 and March 2009.

Entry #2,749

Shirley Sherrod Resigns USDA Job After Admitting Use Of Racial Preference During NAACP Banquet

Shirley Sherrod Resigns USDA Job After Admitting Use Of Racial Preference During NAACP Banquet (VIDEO)

Huffington Post   

Adam J. Rose

First Posted: 07-20-10 04:41 AM   |   Updated: 07-20-10 07:08 AM

 

Shirley Sherrod Usda Naacp

Shirley Sherrod, who resigned Monday from the USDA.

Shirley Sherrod, a USDA official in Georgia, has resigned after publicly admitting that race played a factor in her decision to limit how much aid would be given to a white farmer.

Sherrod, who is African American, made the comments during a local NAACP banquet on March 27, according to information displayed on the video. A clip of her speech first appeared Monday morning on BigGovernment.com and aired that evening on Fox News.

Her resignation as the agency's state director of rural development was quickly accepted by U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack. He cited a zero-tolerance policy and told CNN that he was working to "reverse the checkered civil rights history at the department."

In her controversial speech, Sherrod discussed the first time she was "faced with having to help a white farmer save his farm." She claimed that during the conversation, the man "was trying to show me he was superior to me."

"I was struggling with the fact that so many black people had lost their farmland," Sherrod told the crowd. "And here I was faced with having to help a white person save their land."

"I didn't give him the full force of what I could do."

During the portion of her speech posted online, she mentioned that Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted for family farmers. That protection started in 1986, more than two decades before Sherrod joined the USDA. She added that the incident "opened my eyes."

The website for the department Sherrod last oversaw has a notice clearly stating that the USDA "prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status."

Sherrod appears to have a long record in the civil rights movement prior to her USDA appointment, which came almost exactly a year ago. It's possible that she has been on the other side of the "checkered history" that Vilsack referred to.

The Rural Development Leadership Network lists her as a board member and has a page congratulating her on the appointment. In that announcement, they state that Sherrod and her husband, Charles, were part of a multi-million dollar settlement against the USDA based on civil rights claims from the 1980s. The case wouldn't be settled until May 12, 2009. She was appointed to her USDA job two months later.

A picture on the RDLN website shows her standing with her husband next to a sign for the Charles M. Sherrod Civil Rights Park in their hometown of Albany, GA.

NAACP President Benjamin Jealous issued a statement late on Monday saying his organization was appalled by Sherrod's "shameful" actions.

The NAACP has recently been embroiled in a heated debate after passing a resolution condemning the tea party movement for tolerating bigotry. Mark Williams, spokesperson for the Tea Party Express, responded by calling the NAACP racist and was later expelled from the National Tea Party Federation for a racially charged blog post. Tea party activists are now planning a summit to combat racism.

According to the Atlanta-Journal Constitution, the local chapter of the NAACP has also firmly rejected Sherrod's comments. They further report:

Sherrod, 62, lives in Albany. She was appointed to her position in by Obama in July 2009 to manage more than 40 housing, business and community infrastructure and facility programs, and more than $114 billion in federal loans.

Before that, she had served as director of the Georgia field office for the Federation of Southern Cooperative/Land Assistance Fund.

LINK TO VIDEO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_xCeItxbQY

Entry #2,748

Fox News Glenn Beck: I could go blind next year

Fox News personality Glenn Beck: I could go blind within the next year

Aliyah Shahid
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

 

Tuesday, July 20th 2010, 8:30 AM

 

Fox News personality Glenn Beck may be losing his eyesight, he acknowledged to a crowd in Utah on Saturday.

Caulfield/WireImageFox News personality Glenn Beck may be losing his eyesight, he acknowledged to a crowd in Utah on Saturday.

 

 

The Fox News personality was diagnosed with macular dystrophy and could lose his eyesight within the next year. 

A teary-eyed Beck told a crowd of 6,000 fans during his American Revival tour on Saturday that he went to a doctor after having difficulty focusing his eyes. 

"So, I went to the best doctor I could find -- while I could still go the best doctor I could find," Beck said, taking a jab at healthcare reform. 

Macular dystrophy is a rare genetic condition, which can cause vision loss that grows worse over time. Patients often experience difficulty driving, reading and identifying faces. 

Beck asked the doctor if the condition was a "Jerry Lewis thing." The physician told him he could go blind in the next year -- or he might not. 

"I said, ‘Did you just charge me a thousand dollars for knowing what I already knew my whole life?' I knew that at 3! You might go blind someday. You might not," he joked. 

But then Beck became serious, and his eyes welled with tears and his voice quivered, "Lord if you need my eyes, they're yours," he said. 

The conservative pundit said he can deal with not being able to see his family, because he already knows what they will look like. But, he's terrified about not being able to read. 

"I'm too darn lazy to learn Braille," he said. 

On Monday, Beck acknowledged his condition on his show. He said he is going to deal with his eyesight problems with a smile. 

"I'm grateful that I've had them," he said of his eyes. "I don't want to lose them, but I'm grateful that I have them."

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/07/20/2010-07-20_fox_news_personality_glenn_beck_i_could_go_blind_within_the_next_year.html#ixzz0uETd7p61

Entry #2,747

Is this really an emergency? Judge ask police who called him...

Memo: Cops can only call judges overnight in emergency situations

Orange-Osceola Chief Judge Belvin Perry issued a memo defining when judges can be called during non-business hours to help officers.

 

Bianca Prieto

Orlando Sentinel

10:19 p.m. EDT, July 19, 2010

 

 

Ongoing issues between Orlando police and judges on call during nights and weekends prompted a meeting Monday afternoon to help clarify when police should seek out judges to sign arrest and search warrants and how jurists should respond.

Police Chief Val Demings met with Orange-Osceola Chief Judge Belvin Perry on the heels of a memo Perry wrote last week outlining what constitutes the need for "emergency judicial intervention" outside normal court hours.

During the weekend, the on-call judge turned away an Orlando police officer seeking an arrest affidavit for a suspect in a domestic-violence case at 4:50 a.m. Sunday. Judge John Adams questioned whether the warrant was an emergency that needed to be handled during overnight hours and offered instead to meet the officer at 7:30 a.m. In this case, although the abuser was at large, the victim had been moved to a safe place, so the officer agreed.

"We are not on duty to be subject to calls 24 hours a day," Perry said Monday. "Every judge who is on emergency duty has a regular docket they have to attend to."
 
Now, the Orlando Police Department and court officials are trying to hash out the best policy for involving judges in after-hours intervention. It's an issue because crime is a 24-hour-a-day business, and officers must be able to request warrants for searches or arrests at all hours.

"There had been an issue in the past with a couple of judges who said, 'Is this really an emergency that you would call us in the middle of the night?'" said Natasha Permaul, OPD's legal adviser. "We have come up with some language to [define] when is the right time for the officers to contact the judge in the middle of the night."

In May, Demings sent a written directive to her officers outlining that they were no longer allowed to contact the on-duty judge during non-business hours to get arrest warrants in domestic-violence cases. Confusion about what constitutes an emergency prompted the directive, Permaul said. The temporary order — meant to offer some direction until formal guidelines were issued by Perry — expired in early June.

Last week, Perry sent a memo to all law-enforcement agencies in Orange and Osceola counties outlining when an officer should contact the on-call judge during non-business hours. The guidelines were crafted with input from OPD, Permaul said.

"Emergency-duty judge intervention is only to be sought in rare and extreme circumstances where the law or totality of the circumstances requires immediate action," the memo states. "Most 'emergencies' can be handled during normal court hours utilizing existing procedure."

The memo directs officers who need a judge to sign an arrest or search warrant to be sure that the situation is urgent and that the "lack of immediate action would result in the loss of evidence or the imminent escape of a suspect."

If officers don't know the suspect's identity or whereabouts, they shouldn't call the judge, the memo says. But officers should call the judge if they know who the suspect is, but can't find that person, and the "threat to the safety and welfare of the citizen is great."

But this weekend, while Judge John Adams was performing his weeklong on-call duty — which each judge must perform about once a year — he questioned the officer's call because he did not feel the situation fit the emergency criteria.

In that case, the officer was seeking an arrest warrant for a man who beat up his ex-girlfriend two nights in a row and was on the loose. The woman was removed from her home and taken to a safe place, officers said. The officer called Adams at 4:50 a.m. Sunday asking the judge to sign the warrant.

Adams responded by reading Perry's memo to the officer and then asked to speak to a supervisor.

When reached Monday, Adams told the Orlando Sentinel he found probable cause to sign the affidavit, but questioned whether it fit the definition of emergency. He told the officer to instead meet him at the juvenile courthouse at 7:30 a.m., where Adams would be presiding over first appearances.

But an officer didn't meet Adams until 4 p.m. Sunday, nearly 12 hours after the first call to the judge.

"It was clear that this was not an emergency situation" because officers waited several hours to get the affidavit signed, Adams said. "If it had been an emergency, they could have had it signed much, much sooner."

Permaul said she stands behind the officer's decision to call the judge in the middle of the night and said a miscommunication resulted in the time lag.
Entry #2,746

Lindsay Lohan's new lawyer quits before she heads to jail

Lindsay Lohan's just-hired lawyer Robert Shapiro quits the night before she heads to jail: report

Nancy Dillon
DAILY NEWS WEST COAST BUREAU CHIEF

 

Tuesday, July 20th 2010, 4:00 AM

 

Sources say Lindsay Lohan, who is set to begin her 90-day jail sentence Tuesday, is a 'nervous, fidgety' mess.

POOLSources say Lindsay Lohan, who is set to begin her 90-day jail sentence Tuesday, is a 'nervous, fidgety' mess.

 

LOS ANGELES - Lindsay Lohan was reportedly scrambling for a new lawyer Monday night as she prepared to go to jail Tuesday.

Famed defense attorney Robert Shapiro - who was expected to make an eleventh-hour request for a judge to reduce or restructure LiLo's 90-day sentence - walked out on the troubled actress Monday night, TMZ.com reported. 

It was not immediately clear why Shapiro, a member of O.J. Simpson's Dream Team, quit on Lohan. 

Shapiro refused to comment Monday night, but sounded like he was still preparing to rep Lohan in court. 

"The only comments I will make will be in open court," he e-mailed the Daily News. 

Lohan, 24, last week checked into a sober living facility founded by Shapiro, whose son died in 2005 from a drug overdose. 

Shapiro agreed to take on the "Mean Girls" star's case on the condition she accept a "requirement of jail."

Lohan's previous attorney, Shawn Chapman Holley, parted ways with the starlet this month without explanation. 

As her final hours of freedom ticked down, Lohan seemed to be coming to terms with her fate. 

"The only 'bookings' that I'm familiar with are Disney Twitter page Monday night. 

Lohan has been ordered jailed for 90 days for violating her probation on her DUI case, but she'll probably serve only a quarter of that time because of overcrowding. 

But even a few days at the Century Regional Detention Facility in Los Angeles was enough to crack one ex-inmate. 

"I was depressed and crying every day," Shirley Alexander, 37, of Hawthorne, Calif., told the Daily News. "I was counting the bricks in the walls." 

Lohan is already "a nervous, fidgety mess," a source told People.com. "She has not been able to sleep and has barely been eating." 

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2010/07/20/2010-07-20_lindsay_lohans_lawyer_reportedly_quits.html#ixzz0uDrB8hyK

Entry #2,744

Bank robber takes the money leaves flowers

Manhattan bank robber takes off with the money, leaves bouquet of flowers

John Lauinger
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

 

Monday, July 19th 2010, 6:31 PM

 

The bald-headed bandit put a note inside the flowers at the Bank of Smithtown in Chelsea. 

 

The bald-headed bandit put a note inside the flowers at the Bank of Smithtown in Chelsea.

 

Call this crook the Romeo robber.

Cops released security-camera images Monday of a thief who knocked off a Manhattan bank last week and gave a teller a bouquet of flowers.

The bald-headed bandit put the bouquet to good use, pulling a note from inside the flowers and handing it to a teller at the Bank of Smithtown on Seventh Ave. in Chelsea last Thursday.

"Give me all your $100's, 50's!" the note read. "Don't be a hero!"

The teller complied,forking over an undisclosed amount of cash, police said.

The robber left the bouquet behind - and took off on foot, police said.

The robber, who struck shortly before 9 a.m., was described as a black man in his early 30s, about 5-foot-9. He wore a Navy blue T-shirt, jeans and white sneakers.

Entry #2,743

Man looking for hugs is arrested

Police: Drunken man rejected for hugs, throws punches

 

The Press-Citizen • July 19, 2010

 

Police said a drunken Iowa City man went looking for hugs, but ended up dishing out punches instead Sunday night.

Iowa City Police responded to Town & Campus Apartments, 1100 Arthur St., for a report of a drunk man “being aggressive and punching cars,” at 9 p.m., according to a criminal complaint. After speaking with the complainants, police said they were approached by the suspect, 23-year-old Dominique J. Conway, who lives at the apartment building. 

Police said Conway told them he got mad after he tried to hug a man and got pushed away. Conway responded by punching and denting the hood of a Ford Explorer, police said. Conway also punched the “would-be hug recipient” in the face, causing him pain, police said. 

Police said Conway had a blood-alcohol content of .086. He was arrested and charged with simple assault and fourth-degree criminal mischief, a serious misdemeanor.

 

 

 

Dominique James Conway

 

Dominique James Conway

Entry #2,742

Sarah Palin gets slammed for poor grammar

Sarah Palin uses Twitter to criticize Ground Zero mosque, gets slammed for poor grammar

Michael Sheridan
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITER

 

Monday, July 19th 2010, 1:16 PM

 

Sarah Palin used Twitter to voice her opinion about a controversial Muslim community center being proposed for lower Manhattan.

Krupa/APSarah Palin used Twitter to voice her opinion about a controversial Muslim community center being proposed for lower Manhattan.

The former governor of Alaska has something to say to Muslims in New York: Stop the Ground Zero mosque. 

Sarah Palin posted the remark on Sunday in an effort to involve herself in a local city issue regarding a controversial community center near Ground Zero.

"Peace-seeking Muslims, pls understand, Ground Zero mosque is UNNECESSARY provocation; it stabs hearts," she tweeted. "Pls reject it in interest of healing." 

The mosque, which would be included in a 13-story, $100 million Islamic community center and prayer space on Park Place near Ground Zero, has been under fire from residents for several weeks. 

Originally called the Cordoba House, developers recently changed its name to Park51, in reference to his address. 

Although the final version of the tweet was grammatically correct, Palin went through several incarnations of the post, deleting three versions before arriving at the above statement. 

Bloggers were quick to jump on her first tweet, which included some questionable grammar: 

"Ground Zero Mosque supporters: doesn't it stab you in the heart, as it does ours throughout the heartland? Peaceful Muslims, pls refudiate," she wrote on Sunday afternoon. 

"Refudiate," however, is not an actual word. Palin deleted the post, but not before it was picked up by bloggers, who were quick to mock the one-time vice presidential candidate. 

In response to the critics, Palin posted another tweet that referenced former President Bush, whose inventive use of the English language was often ridiculed. 

She also suggested she was channeling playwright William Shakespeare with her writing. 

"'Refudiate,' 'misunderestimate,' 'wee-wee'd up.' English is a living language. Shakespeare liked to coin new words too. Got to celebrate it!" she posted Sunday night. 

It is not clear what sparked Palin's posts regarding the mosque, which came on the heels of Tea Party Express leader Mark Williams getting kicked out of his position over an offensive blog post he wrote regarding "colored people." 

Palin had also criticized the NAACP last week for labeling the Tea Party as "racist. 

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2010/07/19/2010-07-19_sarah_palin_uses_twitter_to_criticize_ground_zero_mosque_gets_slammed_for_poor_g.html#ixzz0uAHWHIEZ

Entry #2,741