That’s a weird thing to say.

LOL at Jar Jar 

nothing would surprise me about what some of these "overpaid talking heads" would say or have one believe of other folks LOL

* It’s no weirder than saying “ Proud boys stand back &  standby, or l could shoot someone and not lose any votes, or only l can fix it.” I could go on & on, but suffice to say..

@NG, WTH has that got to do with Kamals?

All this talking makes me hungry!

* l dwell in the REAL world MD. If folks are going to take a specific instance & blow it up, l say what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. For to F long “ 8” years now, we have had BS
shoved down our throats & told to pretend it’s normal behavior, l for one will not be re fashioned in the likes of a corrupt politician & think it’s okay.

* Joy is simply speaking her mind- you didn’t seem to look at 45’s remark as racism when he said his “ mugshot” was welcomed by the black community because they “ always going through that ordeal “ you didn’t blink when the fool said his $400 sneakers would be bought by blacks because they love “ basketball.”

* Just telling you like it is , if you upset by my post, well that’s your problem. The bottom line is: l educate, that’s why you read my post, but didn’t like it. I had no idea that l had to run it by you before l got the green light, oh well..

* If Harris screws up- l will call her on it. The BS being thrown around is that Harris was the “ border Czar” which is crap- she was given the task to overlook solutions to the problem with the Southern border countries- she had nothing to do with the so called implementation of migrants crossing into the country- but the Orange keeps bringing it up at his rallies although it’s true. I hate lying politicians whose sole aim is to screw the citizens over, don’t care whether it’s Republicans or Dems.

* Joy is looking at this from a black perspective. When Obama won the Presidency- hopes were high, the bush years brought us endless wars & the motor industry was on the verge of collapsing, Obama came to the rescue & handed the reins to 45 who wasted no time in cutting taxes for the wealthy- if those cuts were so great, why didn’t he run on that? Not a single Republican went back to their districts and spoke about the tax cuts. Obama also gave us Obamacare & 45 wanted to replace it. So much for promises.

* Lastly 45’s actions after his loss to Joe is already written in the history books. Now he wants to “ unite the country?” With his resume- who the F is going to show up at his inauguration if he wins? Placing his hand on the Bible & reciting the oath of office would be a F joke.

Well, in the real-world people stay on point of the subject, not rant and rave about others past. The way you talk, one couldn't almost assume you are a woman who is going through their changes.

nice shot MD10 ROFL

* You probably have little experience of interacting with folks in discussions forums other than this one. A blog or discussion is about a “ number of topic” to enhance the conversation.

* However, having a brain stuck in neutral is hazardous to human intellect. Take your movement for instance: the election is going on 4 years old, but you and others have yet to come to the realization that you guys lost. The courts support my conviction as well, but not you guys.  Btw: if l was a woman, l would be the 1st to know it. Hmm, where did one one come from? Perhaps the appeal appeal from your dear leader who 4 years ago insulted Megan by talking about blood oozing out of everywhere- that got a cheer from the Maga members.

* l bring up various topic to add spice to a conversation. You probably have been to a Trump rally & l date ask, did you get tired of the constant repeats of “ l won big, they cheated, snakes, sharks, low gasoline prices etc etc.” if you did- it tells me all l need to know- you living in the past. Years from now you will probably say l was never in a cult, but we know different.

Adding spice to a (subject) is fine, but when the (Subject) is one thing you carry on about another. so, I guess now we can call you Professor of liberalism who talks one commodity while enhancing another.