Only a COnservative writer of fiction on a FOX News entity could and/or would define history of consisting only of just the past 3 years and 5 months!

Judging from Mr. Obama’s questions, one subject was uppermost in his mind: how could he become a “transformational” president and bend the historic trajectory of America’s domestic and foreign policy?
When one of the historians brought up the difficulties that Lyndon Johnson, another wartime president, faced trying to wage a foreign military venture while implementing an ambitious domestic agenda, Mr. Obama grew testy. He implied that he was different, because he could prevail by the force of his personality. He could solve the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, put millions of people back to work, redistribute wealth, withdraw from Iraq, and reconcile the United States to a less dominant role in the world.
It was, by any measure, a breathtaking display of grandiosity by a man whose entire political curriculum vitae consisted of SEVEN UNDISTINGUISHED YEARS IN THE ILLINOIS SENATE AND TWO MOSTLY ABSENT YEARS IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE. That evening Mr. Obama revealed the characteristics—arrogance, conceit, egotism, vanity, hubris and, above all, rank amateurism—that would mark his presidency and doom it to frustration and failure
______________________________________________________________
That pretty much sums it up what historians will think of " O ".   Outside of being the worst President since Jimmy Carter.

they are awaiting his book to come out after 2016,on the first 1/2 black president.

He is not historical he is hysterical.

Actually he can start writing his fiction novel in January 2013....

What do historians think?
Hah, if they have half a brain they know he's an incompetent dope.
But they'll cover for him.
As usual.