Arizona immigration law: Supreme Court upholds key portion of Senate Bill 1070

Published:

Entry #7,971

Comments

Avatar scorpio -
#1
i think they split.
Avatar bobbya -
#2
Let's see?
One out of Four Provisions in the law ruled unconstitutional!
MADDOG,rdgrnr,JAP69,sully16,jarasan will all say that it's a victory for Republicans as will The FOX Republican News Network,all the fascist talking heads of nazi a/m radio,and ALL Republican members of Congress.
Avatar scorpio -
#3
a victory for obama i read.
Avatar rdgrnr -
#4
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
YIP YIP YIP YIP YIP YIP YIP YIP YIP YIP YIP YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Avatar bobbya -
#5
the ridge runner should ALWAYS take his MEDS!
Avatar MADDOG10 -
#6
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld a key part of Arizona's crackdown on illegal immigrants on Monday, rejecting the Obama administration's stance that only the U.S. government should enforce immigration laws in the United States.

The nation's highest court, in an opinion by Justice Anthony Kennedy, unanimously upheld the state law's most controversial aspect, requiring police officers to check the immigration status of people they stop.

But in a split decision, the justices also ruled that the three other challenged provisions went too far in intruding on federal law, including one that makes it a crime for illegal immigrants to work and another that requires them to carry their documents.

"Arizona may have understandable frustrations with the problems caused by illegal immigration ... but the state may not pursue policies that undermine federal law," Justice Kennedy wrote in a 25-page opinion.

Kennedy said the mandatory nature of police checks did not interfere with the federal immigration scheme, and found unpersuasive the Obama administration's argument that this portion of the law must be preempted at this stage.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Whoo, wow they got three.. which don't amount to squat/ didley..
Hmmmm, they found the Obama administrations argument, UNPERSUASIVE.
If thats a victory for the "o" oh well, bask in your glory..      Ha Ha Ha Ha...!
Avatar scorpio -
#7
we are!
Avatar louise black -
#8
Hell! we 're not in the days of Frankfurt Germany in Hilter day and the day of the Emancipation Proclamation of the South people don't have to walk around in this country with free papers because of the color of their skin.

Post a Comment

Please Log In

To use this feature you must be logged into your Lottery Post account.

Not a member yet?

If you don't yet have a Lottery Post account, it's simple and free to create one! Just tap the Register button and after a quick process you'll be part of our lottery community.

Register