<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>GTECH explains pricey N.J. Lottery contract</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/news/142898" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post News Story: GTECH explains pricey N.J. Lottery contract</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/693225</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/693225</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 23:54:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rubi 311</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>GTECH Corporation has MORE resources than any other gaming corporation that exists at this point. I believe they run 29 out of 34 states and around 56 lotteries outside the U.S.  They run Louisiana, Florida, Texas, Illinois, Georgia...and many more.<br /><br />My spouse USE to be the GTECH Operations Manager for ILllinois for years. His comparison of GTECH to other gaming corporations... It depends on what kind of vehicle you want to get you there...a Cadillac or a Pinto</p>]]></description>
			<category>Rubi 311</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/693136</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/693136</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Connecticut is close to New Jersey, but it&#x27;s not really a  neighboring  state.<br /><br />Really, I can&#x27;t tell you which terminal is better than the other. They all do the same things to me. Personally, I like the look of GTech tickets over that of Scientific Games. GTech just looks more professional. But then again, I&#x27;m a connoisseur when it comes to this stuff.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/692968</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/692968</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:17:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Drivedabizness</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The real pricing equation is tough to calculate sometimes...<br /><br />For example, if you bid a percentage of sales, you assume a certain level of sales, times your percentage, to get an estimated contract cost to the State. I haven&#x27;t seen those assumptions published.<br /><br />Look at neighboring Connecticut - their terminals (admittedly, they are old) break down all the time.<br /><br />SciGames also has no experience running a state this big. It would only take a couple of extra days of down time t... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/692968">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Drivedabizness</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/692497</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/692497</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:54:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rdc137</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to boycott this is with your dollar. Spend it elsewhere and make it harder for them to afford the contract.</p>]]></description>
			<category>rdc137</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/692459</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898/692459</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:57:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>floridian</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Anybody:<br /><br />Does not GTech manage the Louisiana Lottery?  Either than or one or more of the Southern States.  They have huge assets and apparently put their spare cash in the right pockets.<br /><br />Floridian</p>]]></description>
			<category>floridian</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GTECH explains pricey N.J. Lottery contract</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 18:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lottery Post</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Seeking to justify a price tag of nearly $32 million more than a competitor to run the New Jersey&#x27;s lottery for the next five years, representatives of the state&#x27;s lottery operator said Wednesday that their system is more convenient for vendors and would result in less down time and lost revenues for the state.<br /><br />Representatives for GTech, which won a new contract despite bidding $106.7 million to Scientific Games&#x27; $75 million, said the higher price comes with more assurance that its terminals... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/news/142898">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lottery Post</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

