PA Lucky For Life Lotto

Reply #36

CASH Only — Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:59:45 GMT

Nobody suggested shifting the draw nights.

Reply #35

CASH Only — Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:25:25 GMT

Super 7 was a keno game.

Reply #34

DoctorEw220 — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:23:18 GMT

i would like PA to have a pick 10/20/80 or 100 game. with draws every 5 minutes it would draw custmers out the you-know-where.

Reply #33

Greg — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:08:39 GMT

Replace this game with a Keno 20/80 game

Reply #32

DoctorEw220 — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:16:23 GMT

one (or more) of three things would have to happen first.1. incredible inflation and a grand means nothing.2. $5 or $10 a play.3. incredibly high odds. (i'm talking make it a pick 6/100+).i'd go or $1000 a week for life instead.

Reply #31

dvdiva — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 06:08:04 GMT

I would love to see a $1000/day for life game. That would be tempting.

Reply #30

DoctorEw220 — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:25:32 GMT

and the sales are getting crappier. less than 40,000 instant winners in the month of march so far.

Reply #29

DoctorEw220 — Wed, 23 Mar 2005 03:22:24 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by CASH Only on January 12, 2005 Now we don't know how many instant losers...PA must be embarrassed.if you know where to look, you can find the figures.

Reply #28

CASH Only — Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:00:13 GMT

You've got a friend in PA if they're boycotting Unlucky for Life.

Reply #27

CASH Only — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:43:07 GMT

Still only two lifetime losers

Reply #26

CASH Only — Sat, 29 Jan 2005 19:42:25 GMT

Mars:Unlucky for Life should be rated NC-71 (nobody under the age of 71 is allowed to play).

Reply #25

JimmySand9 — Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:15:31 GMT

I'm sure PA is getting a huge profit margins from this game. And they're still probably not making much money. I wish they would replace it with Wild Card Lotto or Super 7. Take a piece of the past into the future.

Reply #24

JMorenoMars — Sat, 29 Jan 2005 05:06:08 GMT

PA is not willing to give up on Lucky for Life just yet. I was surfing their website today when I noticed that in February, retailers will participate in a voluntary Lucky for Life promotion. It's something like players can enter their non-winning LFL tickets in a second-chance drawing that is conducted at that retailer each week. And, in my mailbox today there was coupons in there for Buy One Lucky for Life ticket get one Lucky for Life ticket free. There is one in there for February and one in... [ More ]

Reply #23

DoctorEw220 — Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:15:56 GMT

darn near all.

Reply #22

CASH Only — Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:54:08 GMT

If a lifetime game had a cash option, what percentage would take the lump sum

Reply #21

CASH Only — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:37:53 GMT

Lary:Sorry, but Unlucky for Life needs to be canned.

Reply #20

LckyLary — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:47:37 GMT

I am rarely in the state of PA but my system often matches 3 of 6, but the top prize is a tad weak in light of Powerball. If you calculate your life expectancy and add up the 36K a year vs. a modest Powerball jackpot, Powerball pays a lot more. But the attraction for Life is the easier odds, the instant win chance (if the terminals are honest!) and the ease of getting at least 3 numbers. They do have a scratchoff Win For Life also, same price, so another advantage of course is you get to pick nu... [ More ]

Reply #19

DoctorEw220 — Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:36:41 GMT

they're entitled to believe whatever they want.

Reply #18

CASH Only — Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:09:50 GMT

Some wacko believes Tennessee's next online game will be an Unlucky for Life clone.

Reply #17

CASH Only — Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:46:21 GMT

OR and WA need to discontinue their games as well.

Reply #16

CASH Only — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:39:01 GMT

PA should just retire it.

Reply #15

JimmySand9 — Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:26:30 GMT

One thing that might happen is PA might just retool the game. They might just put Lucky For Life in the form of what OR WA has.

Reply #14

CASH Only — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 18:16:43 GMT

Now we don't know how many instant losers...PA must be embarrassed.

Reply #13

CASH Only — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:27:53 GMT

It will end soon after it drops below 15,000.

Reply #12

JMorenoMars — Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:21:27 GMT

20,225 Instant Winners for Lucky for Life Lotto. I see the first numbers for 2005 being below 20,000. We'll see how it goes. THE END IS NEAR

Reply #11

CASH Only — Sat, 25 Dec 2004 16:37:21 GMT

Not every day, but NO MORE.

Reply #10

ADB-23 — Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:47:51 GMT

DECREASE TO 1.00 AND INCREASE WINNING HAVE IT EVERYDAY.

Reply #9

JMorenoMars — Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:16:36 GMT

The plug will be pulled soon enough. I can see it coming...

Reply #8

CASH Only — Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:16:35 GMT

C,mon PA, pull the plug

Reply #7

CASH Only — Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:24:30 GMT

I guess if people are avoiding this game, they aren't posting about it.

Reply #6

CASH Only — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 20:47:41 GMT

I dare you to find another reason why Arnold S (I won't try to spell his last name) needs to terminate this game

Reply #5

CASH Only — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:33:00 GMT

I saw the post that said there are NO multi-draw options for this game (because of the INSTANT LOSE feature?) Another reason why this game is tanking

Reply #4

Grammy3 — Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:24:37 GMT

Iwould not do it more nights. There has only been two winners since it started. Give it up!!!!! They should give up twice a day drawings on 3 4 digit and increase the pay-out. 3 digit would be good at 350.00 straight and 100.00 boxed. They are working on no game for $1.00.

Reply #3

CASH Only — Sun, 28 Nov 2004 18:12:04 GMT

Why nightly for this stupid game? Twice a week is bad enough.

Reply #2

DoctorEw220 — Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:47:38 GMT

sorry dude, but it just can't be done.

Reply #1

JimmySand9 — Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:41:40 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by DoctorEw220 on November 26, 2004 Ok. I know CASHOnly has done several polls about this game, and I am not wild about the game. i did give it a chance. I bought 2 tickets for the previous draw. I did not win anything, not even an instant winner. Anyway, what do you think PA needs to do in order to achieve better sales for the game. Personally, they need to do a lot of things, such as decreasing the ticket price to $1, increase the top prize to $1000/WEEK for life, and

PA Lucky For Life Lotto

DoctorEw220 — Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:49:31 GMT

Ok. I know CASHOnly has done several polls about this game, and I am not wild about the game. i did give it a chance. I bought 2 tickets for the previous draw. I did not win anything, not even an instant winner. Anyway, what do you think PA needs to do in order to achieve better sales for the game. Personally, they need to do a lot of things, such as decreasing the ticket price to $1, increase the top prize to $1000/WEEK for life, and hold drawings every night instead of Wednesdays and Saturdays... [ More ]