Texas Evening 2/26...Bound to be a winner

Reply #17

Texasman — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:47:07 GMT

Okee-dokey

Reply #16

greeneyes — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:02:07 GMT

please keep posting all of them and let us pick the ones we want for a while ...i like all 3 of them..thanks for your hard work ...

Reply #15

lazyjim — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:03:02 GMT

Go get 'em Tex

Reply #14

Texasman — Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:50:51 GMT

(Suggestion: One way to sort out and reduce is to use just the combos that have a 5 or 4 or 1 from last night's draw. Or any that have a 0 in them, since 0 is due to come.) The red highlighted statement holds true once again.Howdy,Thanks for the positive feedback from fans of Formula One. It seems that a double shows up when I get the most confident in a method and then it misses by one number. Well, at least it beats pulling cards out of a hat! They did work in the past each time I used it. K... [ More ]

Reply #13

msmusic — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:57:27 GMT

Formula One: 395, 304, 305, 306, 315, 494, 495, 496, 404, 405, 406, 414, 415, 416, 595, 505, 506, 515. I got the 955 off the print out of the midday cash sale. Had I remember to convert the 9 to a 4 .I would have won. So Keep up the work . I think formula 1 is the one. We just have to remember that the numbers do convert. 9 =4, 7=2, 5=0, 1=6,3=8. It awalys good to play the conversion at time to be safe.

Reply #12

txpolo — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:28:51 GMT

Txman, please continue to post your 3 formulas daily.You're doing a great job.Thanks

Reply #11

Justin — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:36:00 GMT

i thought formula 1 was pretty impressive, it had the pairs nailed very well. nothing can hit all the time.

Reply #10

CalifDude — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:18:49 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by orangeman on February 27, 2005I beg to differ. Formula one was heavy in 4s and 5s.OrangemanBut not the winning number!! Texasman said they always produced winners. When they start paying for 2 correct numbers, we will be rich

Reply #9

orangeman — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:03:23 GMT

I beg to differ. Formula one was heavy in 4s and 5s.Orangeman

Reply #8

CalifDude — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 05:41:17 GMT

Texasman, I think you need another formula!! Those are not working

Reply #7

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:47:37 GMT

joyjoy8, your predictions are grrrrrrrrrrrrrreat.

Reply #6

KYPHILLY — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:26:09 GMT

I just got 6 more qp:934,914,018,819,442,101I'm with you Joy, if we only knew......kyphilly

Reply #5

joyjoy8 — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:11:34 GMT

Qick picks tonight259*591*014*000*543If I only knew............................................Joy

Reply #4

casper — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 02:36:30 GMT

059 - 086 -986How about those

Reply #3

KYPHILLY — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:49:07 GMT

i also got 404 for a day qp. kyphilly

Reply #2

KYPHILLY — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 01:42:43 GMT

Txman,I got 944 as a qp tonight. hmmm kyphilly

Reply #1

txpolo — Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:43:07 GMT

276,267

Texas Evening 2/26...Bound to be a winner

Texasman — Sat, 26 Feb 2005 21:34:00 GMT

OK, I have three formulas that have produced winners each time. I've just been using one or the other on the wrong night. So, here are results from the three different formulas to see once and for all if tonight will prove these methods as viable. All numbers are boxed.Formula One: 395, 304, 305, 306, 315, 494, 495, 496, 404, 405, 406, 414, 415, 416, 595, 505, 506, 515.Formula Two: 944, 629, 472, 377, 314, 269(a repeat), 236, 209, 188.Formula Three: 944(a repeat), 899, 858, 820, 786, 755, 726, 6... [ More ]