<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>1-digit carryovers</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/108802" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: 1-digit carryovers</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #20</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345502</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345502</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:45:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>emilyg</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thanks - great info</p>]]></description>
			<category>emilyg</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #19</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345497</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345497</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>it can be quite profitable to track exact carryovers by position.good luck</p>]]></description>
			<category>Justin</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #18</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345491</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345491</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:26:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sandy K</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Badger...............</p>]]></description>
			<category>Sandy K</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #17</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345484</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345484</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:47:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Sandy K on March 3, 2005Badger, I am a proponent of combining the mid-eve draws......like you said to each his own..........curious though, on a merged file, does that 1 digit carryover percentage hold true for the merged draw...........it would be interesting. I don&#x27;t have the new versabet so I have no way of knowing........but I suspect that it would be higher for Michigan with the combined draw since that is the state I track..............Sandy, the following is wh... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345484">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #16</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345475</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345475</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:29:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Three2001 on March 3, 2005This is all good info for the uninitiated.  I agree with the 1 repeating number numbers, but I also agree that if you want to narrow down a list of picks that&#x27;s one way to do it.  Especially if it&#x27;s been, say, twice as long as normal or more since a number repeated. I show two numbers repeating about every 6 to 7 draws on the states I track which is about 16% or so I think.  That&#x27;s with day and night draws figured separately.Another interesti... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345475">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #15</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345468</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345468</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:06:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sandy K</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting observation, Three2001!!  Thank you.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Sandy K</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #14</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345456</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345456</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Three2001</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is all good info for the uninitiated.  I agree with the 1 repeating number numbers, but I also agree that if you want to narrow down a list of picks that&#x27;s one way to do it.  Especially if it&#x27;s been, say, twice as long as normal or more since a number repeated. I show two numbers repeating about every 6 to 7 draws on the states I track which is about 16% or so I think.  That&#x27;s with day and night draws figured separately.Another interesting piece of info is that a combination of numbers pick... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345456">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Three2001</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #13</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345449</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345449</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sandy K</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Badger, I am a proponent of combining the mid-eve draws......like you said to each his own..........curious though, on a merged file, does that 1 digit carryover percentage hold true for the merged draw...........it would be interesting. I don&#x27;t have the new versabet so I have no way of knowing........but I suspect that it would be higher for Michigan with the combined draw since that is the state I track..............</p>]]></description>
			<category>Sandy K</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #12</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345443</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345443</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:46:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Sedertree on March 3, 2005Nice research Badger....Question....Are these CO digit stats for any position, same or both?...../GeorgeHi George ! Good to  talk  with you again. The stats are strictly for ANY position in the following draw, in the SAME game. (in this case, the mid day games for reach state as I mentioned) IOW they are not positional stats.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345442</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345442</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:42:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by four4me on March 3, 2005I like what you posted about this because i follow the carry overs. However are you refering to a one or two digit carying over from a midday draw to and evening draw or midday to midday.I think that if i were tracking the carrys i would be looking at draw to draw.I look at the results pages on here frequently and many states show carry overs every day. i haven&#x27;t broken it down to percentages but by observations i would have to say that it woul... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345442">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345437</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345437</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:30:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by takeitez on March 3, 2005Thanks Badger for the research, very useful.  I would like your opinion on this thought: wonder how it would affect the percent of 1-digit carryovers taking into consideration  doubles have only 2 digits to carry over as opposed the the 3 digits in a 6-way. Don&#x27;t you think it might bring the final number closer to the 50% mark?  Very nice work and thanks again for posting your findingsezYou could have a good point there EZ...but even if it doe... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345437">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345435</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345435</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Prometheus1 on March 3, 2005 The final figures are 1 digit carry over right? Does it also include 2 digit carry overs as well ? This was very good research Badger and thank you for the time you must have spent. It really kills me that no one else on the forum said WTG or thanks. They throw those  WTG&#x27;s  out for Car tag numbers. Serious research post that take time and energy get nothing I suppose.  Well, here is something. Thanks Badger!   No Prometheus, the figures a... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345435">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345195</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345195</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:25:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Sedertree</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Nice research Badger....Question....Are these CO digit stats for any position, same or both?...../George</p>]]></description>
			<category>Sedertree</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345188</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345188</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:07:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CalifDude</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Badger for the very interesting information.  It is one of the things I look at (combined data base) on each of the states I track.  Your figures are consistant with what I have found.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CalifDude</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345187</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345187</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:05:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CalifDude</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Prometheus1 on March 3, 2005  Interesting to consider that half the time you could use a wheel of the numbers that didn&#x27;t hit. Only use the other 7 numbers each time. Say the number yesterday was 789. We could then wheel 01234 56.  Thats only 35 numbers Digits: 0123456Results:012 013 014 015 016 023 024 025 026 034 035 036 045 046 056 123 124 125 126 134 135 136 145 146 156 234 235 236 245 246 256 345 346 356 456No. of Results: 35 It wouldn&#x27;t be half the time.  If 1-d... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345187">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>CalifDude</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345152</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345152</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Prometheus1</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to consider that half the time you could use a wheel of the numbers that didn&#x27;t hit. Only use the other 7 numbers each time. Say the number yesterday was 789. We could then wheel 01234 56.  Thats only 35 numbers Digits: 0123456Results:012 013 014 015 016 023 024 025 026 034 035 036 045 046 056 123 124 125 126 134 135 136 145 146 156 234 235 236 245 246 256 345 346 356 456No. of Results: 35</p>]]></description>
			<category>Prometheus1</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345147</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345147</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:36:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>four4me</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I like what you posted about this because i follow the carry overs. However are you refering to a one or two digit carying over from a midday draw to and evening draw or midday to midday.I think that if i were tracking the carrys i would be looking at draw to draw.I look at the results pages on here frequently and many states show carry overs every day. i haven&#x27;t broken it down to percentages but by observations i would have to say that it would pay to play the caryovers.</p>]]></description>
			<category>four4me</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345141</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345141</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>takeitez</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Badger for the research, very useful.  I would like your opinion on this thought: wonder how it would affect the percent of 1-digit carryovers taking into consideration  doubles have only 2 digits to carry over as opposed the the 3 digits in a 6-way. Don&#x27;t you think it might bring the final number closer to the 50% mark?  Very nice work and thanks again for posting your findingsez</p>]]></description>
			<category>takeitez</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345139</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345139</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CARBOB</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are the stats for Florida, if my math is correct. 0 Carried  38.8%  2 Carried 13.2%  1 Carried 48% Thanks Badger for bringing attention to this.  Carbob</p>]]></description>
			<category>CARBOB</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345130</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802/345130</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:52:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Prometheus1</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The final figures are 1 digit carry over right? Does it also include 2 digit carry overs as well ? This was very good research Badger and thank you for the time you must have spent. It really kills me that no one else on the forum said WTG or thanks. They throw those  WTG&#x27;s  out for Car tag numbers. Serious research post that take time and energy get nothing I suppose.  Well, here is something. Thanks Badger</p>]]></description>
			<category>Prometheus1</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>1-digit carryovers</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:30:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Badger</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;ve seen enough people posting about how one method of filtering your combos to get them down to a reasonable number in Pick 3 is to play only those that have at least one digit from the previous drawing, so I decided to actually look at the numbers.The following is from all records (since each game started) in the Mid Day games only (since those are the ones I follow) -- It was done using VersaBet&#x27;s  combo  report. That report shows the number of games that there was a 0-carried digit, and a 2... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/108802">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Badger</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

