Lotto TN??

Reply #23

konane — Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:30:54 GMT

Yeah she's the one that began Lotto GA then shut it down in favor of Lotto South which IMHO was a very bad idea and made lots of Georgians unhappy including me. Lotto South jackpots are not much higher than Lotto Georgia jackpots were, has a higher matrix and simply is not as enjoyable.Hey, let Mrs. Paul join Lotto South and let Georgia go back to Lotto Georgia!! That would be a winner

Reply #22

Tnplayer805 — Sun, 03 Jul 2005 17:10:20 GMT

I'm for either one. But chances are TN will go with Lottosouth. I also think SC is looking to join this game as well. It says on their website they aren't going to have an instate lotto because they are too small. Lotto south would be perfect for the players who don't like the odds on powerball.

Reply #21

DoctorEw220 — Sun, 03 Jul 2005 07:00:07 GMT

Although TN could support an in-state lotto game, so could VA, KY, and GA. They just chose to combine their games to form Lotto South. TN has the player capability to support an in-state pick 6 game with a multi-million dollar (annuitized with cash option) jackpot game, but considering the fact that a lot of TN players are going elsewhere to play Lotto South, Lotto South is better for the players of TN.

Reply #20

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 01 Jul 2005 11:35:35 GMT

i agree we need lotto south.

Reply #19

CASH Only — Thu, 30 Jun 2005 13:55:14 GMT

LS $2 million for Saturday, July 2.

Reply #18

CASH Only — Tue, 31 May 2005 20:48:19 GMT

Lotto South all the way.

Reply #17

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 06 May 2005 05:21:41 GMT

yeah powerball does get boring.

Reply #16

Tnplayer805 — Fri, 06 May 2005 05:19:47 GMT

Ya'll have great ideas. I just wish TN lottery officals were reading this. They have to be thinking about a lotto game or lotto south. This just shows TN could have a pretty good Instate lotto game rather than lotto south. I really think this will make them think a little. Or atleast I hope it does. At this point I wouldn't mind what we get.(lotto south, hot lotto, or Lotto TN). I'm getting kind of sick of Powerball as of late. Not saying powerball isn't a good game it's just the game it... [ More ]

Reply #15

JimmySand9 — Fri, 06 May 2005 05:06:37 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LOTTOMIKE on May 6, 2005they would have to put it on different nights than lotto 5.Lotto would be Tuesday and Friday. So I would move Lotto 5 to Mondays, Wednesdays and Saturdays. It would compete better with Powerball than Tennessee Lotto, the differences in prizes are greater.

Reply #14

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 06 May 2005 05:04:02 GMT

they would have to put it on different nights than lotto 5.

Reply #13

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 06 May 2005 05:03:19 GMT

sounds like a winner.....

Reply #12

JimmySand9 — Fri, 06 May 2005 05:01:43 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LOTTOMIKE on May 6, 2005you are good at figuring out games so what would be a good pick six matrix and what would the prizes be like if you ran it?I don't know. I would need to look at other states of similar population, as well as what Tennessee players seem to like. They seem more jackpot driven, so I would probably put a large percentage in the jackpot as opposed to lower prize levels. As for a matrix, I would go for somewhere in the 1 in 7m - 1 in 14m range.

Reply #11

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 06 May 2005 04:54:47 GMT

you are good at figuring out games so what would be a good pick six matrix and what would the prizes be like if you ran it

Reply #10

JimmySand9 — Fri, 06 May 2005 04:45:50 GMT

I have been thinking of ideas for a Tennessee pick-6 mid-range jackpot game. Lotto South would not work as well because the influx of new players would cause way too many winners, like we saw with Powerball earlier this year. It would be in the best interest for Tennessee and current Lotto South players for TN to go in-state.

Reply #9

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 06 May 2005 01:54:18 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by JAG331 on May 5, 2005Mrs. Paul's fishsticks....in your grocer's freezer aisle.fisher boy and gortons are good too.....

Reply #8

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 06 May 2005 01:52:56 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by CASH Only on May 5, 2005TN should not try an in-state million-dollar jackpot game, but offer Lotto South instead.now that i have thought about it i agree because there are more people playing and the jackpots will grow quicker.

Reply #7

CASH Only — Fri, 06 May 2005 01:25:47 GMT

TN should not try an in-state million-dollar jackpot game, but offer Lotto South instead.

Reply #6

JAG331 — Thu, 05 May 2005 23:07:57 GMT

Mrs. Paul's fishsticks....in your grocer's freezer aisle.

Reply #5

Tnplayer805 — Thu, 05 May 2005 22:49:35 GMT

Fishstick

Reply #4

JAG331 — Thu, 05 May 2005 22:28:57 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Tnplayer805 on May 5, 2005This is from Mrs. Paul, Excitement is building about the first in-state million-dollar jackpot, Can ya'll take a hint now? If we have an instate lotto we might have more people play. Lotto 5 is great. Lotto TN would be better. Not saying anything bad about Lotto South but when there is a jackpot just for TN this high people are going to play!Isn't she the fishstick lady

Reply #3

LOTTOMIKE — Thu, 05 May 2005 20:30:34 GMT

lotto south or tn lotto would both be fine to me but with lotto south there would always be other states winning a lot.....

Reply #2

LOTTOMIKE — Thu, 05 May 2005 20:29:37 GMT

i'm wondering if we would get our own in state lotto or if we would get lotto south,what do ya'll think

Reply #1

Littleoldlady — Thu, 05 May 2005 20:26:53 GMT

I agree

Lotto TN??

Tnplayer805 — Thu, 05 May 2005 20:25:23 GMT

This is from Mrs. Paul, Excitement is building about the first in-state million-dollar jackpot, Can ya'll take a hint now? If we have an instate lotto we might have more people play. Lotto 5 is great. Lotto TN would be better. Not saying anything bad about Lotto South but when there is a jackpot just for TN this high people are going to play