I Hate Computerized Drawings

Reply #17

Maverick — Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:54:50 GMT

also. I just did not want you thinking I was weaseling around my writing. I will not include anymore crude comments in future postings. I'm glad we see the truth.

Reply #16

DirtyWrat — Sat, 09 Jul 2005 15:17:29 GMT

Reply #15

Todd — Sat, 09 Jul 2005 12:21:47 GMT

People can say whatever they want on whatever lottery game they want. I have no problem with CO pushing his hate of NY Lotto, and it would never enter my mind to ask him (or anyone) to limit their writing of their opinion on games. Heck, I even let that employee of the computerized drawing company write all that BS about how great computerized drawings are, with no thought of censoring his opinion.I just want to keep the forum a little family-friendly , because , believe it or not, some peopl... [ More ]

Reply #14

Maverick — Sat, 09 Jul 2005 05:13:21 GMT

Yes, now I know what you're talking about. Before I thought it was the NY Lotto comment, cos you were not specific, and you had recently talked to CO about his comment on how bad NY Lotto is.I do not weasel around. Now I know what you're talking about.

Reply #13

LOTTOMIKE — Sat, 09 Jul 2005 01:52:47 GMT

Reply #12

Todd — Fri, 08 Jul 2005 22:48:35 GMT

You know exactly what I'm talking about.

Reply #11

Maverick — Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:36:49 GMT

I'm really not being funny. I neither want to argue over this. If one cannot express his views on your forum, please Todd, add these types of comments onto your banned list of what not to say .If you're speaking of the balls hanging low comment, I will gladly stop that.

Reply #10

CASH Only — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:44:43 GMT

NY Lotto is not worth playing, no matter how the numbers are drawn.

Reply #9

ryanm — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 15:33:54 GMT

Didn't Indiana already admit that they rig their pick 3/ pick 4 drawings so frequently played combinations don't appear

Reply #8

Todd — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 13:08:58 GMT

I don't find these type of comments very funny anymore.

Reply #7

Maverick — Thu, 07 Jul 2005 05:50:15 GMT

July 612 13 16 24 25 39 Bonus 30I see what you're doing nylottery. Does the state put you up to it?Your balls are hanging really low at this point.

Reply #6

Maverick — Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:57:37 GMT

June 294 22 40 41 43 44 Bonus 47NOW they really got balls

Reply #5

LOTTOMIKE — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:39:37 GMT

i think indiana will be the first place this happens....

Reply #4

Rip Snorter — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 12:01:25 GMT

I'd guess that's the result, but not the purpose. The purpose is ease of administration, not having to worry about security for the ball machines. So they put in RNG, and try not to think about the vulnerability to someone rigging that.Then, someone in a small office somewhere who's sweating blood and bullets because the inflated billboard claims about the prizes being larger than they are still haven't got the grunts rushing out to buy tickets. He wanders into his bosses office to brainstorm... [ More ]

Reply #3

LOTTOMIKE — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:42:42 GMT

hopefully one day all states will be required to be ball drawings.....

Reply #2

Maverick — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:52:48 GMT

I agree with that. Paranoia is perfectly fine when it comes to lotteries and having combinations recorded. I feel they should find another way to tell if a player has won the jackpot/if the $$$ will rollover, instead of recording our number combinations. But of course they won't. They care not for our concerns/paranoia, until their credibility has all but been stomped on. Some people will say I'm paranoid, but even with todays non-computerized lotteries, I feel something is fishy.I wanted to tal... [ More ]

Reply #1

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:51:44 GMT

your not paranoid,in fact everything you just said is the same thing i've always believed.i think they program the computerized results and the numbers that win are numbers that aren't chosen.....

I Hate Computerized Drawings

Greg — Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:16:09 GMT

Computerized drawings can ALWAYS be rigged. The Delaware Lottery is a case in point. I have no proof, but every fiber of my being says that lottery is pre-programmed not to select numbers as winners that players have chosen.What is the purpose of computerized drawings anyway? I'll tell you: it has one purpose: to increase the state's profits through covert control of the number selection process against the grid of numbers or combinations selected by the players for each drawing.Ok ok, call me... [ More ]