To all Lottery Post members

Reply #5

CASH Only — Mon, 05 Sep 2005 20:55:17 GMT

ichoro:Kentucky is a MUSL member selling Lotto South. I doubt there would be a conflict, other than LS and PB drawn on the same nights.

Reply #4

four4me — Sat, 03 Sep 2005 19:27:25 GMT

personally i don't see why anyone should worry about another states lottery unless it in some way affected their state lottery. On another note if state lottery's want to offer a game to help benefit the disaster area then all states who wish to get involved will have to vote or decide jointly to do so.

Reply #3

konane — Sat, 03 Sep 2005 19:20:22 GMT

No offense taken. Seems everyone is trying to come up with solutions to the problems down there.Like LottoVantage said about foot-in-mouth, mine stays there much of the time.

Reply #2

lchoro — Sat, 03 Sep 2005 18:42:06 GMT

I believe they're a Powerball member so there would be a conflict with Lotto South. Other prospective states have requested that LS move their drawing nights to accomodate Powerball. In any event, for the foreseeable future Louisiana has ,uch more important things to deal with than a lottery.

Reply #1

LottoVantage — Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:32:45 GMT

CASH Only - appology accepted. No one on here, including myself, can honestly say that they haven't inserted foot in mouth at one time or another. Your foot insertion was no different than any one else's! LottoVantage

To all Lottery Post members

CASH Only — Sat, 03 Sep 2005 15:06:50 GMT

I'm sorry that my recent post about Louisiana joining Lotto South was not viewed the way I expected. What I meant was that the LA Lottery, and the state government, if necessary, AFTER things return as close to normal as possible, should persue joining Lotto South.Again, I'm sorry about how my message was received.