Honest Lotto System ?

Reply #20

Greg — Wed, 26 Oct 2005 02:42:53 GMT

As I wrote above, it plays on the gullibility of those looking to make a quick buck as if there IS such a system that can immediately yield you bucks when playing the lottery which one might infer from title. Not so, though. Let's delete this thread before someone else makes this seller richer.

Reply #19

jim695 — Wed, 26 Oct 2005 01:00:52 GMT

Very well, then - let's try an experiment:I've just returned from Michigan, where I bought $65.00 worth of MegaMillions tickets.I selected twelve combinations myself, and fifteen were QP's. I have ten QP's and two self-selected numbers good for tonight's draw only, and the remainder are good for the next three draws. However, the two combinations I selected for tonight's drawing are duplicates (same numbers) because I hadn't selected multi-draw on the bet slip. Before the problem was corrected,... [ More ]

Reply #18

LottoVantage — Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:43:29 GMT

BobP...Lotto Pro 2005 has a RNG feature in their program.Here are some numbers generated with it for tonights Mega Millions, we'll see how it does.01-13-42-45-47 3302-17-18-52-56 3504-17-28-32-56 1704-18-29-33-52 4205-21-24-42-47 4207-17-29-33-56 3813-24-26-40-42 2916-17-19-39-56 1216-28-29-32-33 1320-23-24-26-45 25Good luck!LottoVantage

Reply #17

Greg — Wed, 26 Oct 2005 00:23:10 GMT

I am always mighty suspicious whenever ANYONE uses the word HONEST in such a phrase as honest Lotto System ...It's not honest because of all the information that's left out... And it plays on the gullibility of those looking to make a quick buck as if there IS such a system that can immediately yield you bucks when playing the lottery which one might infer from title. Not so, though. Let's delete this thread before someone else makes this seller richer.

Reply #16

pacattack05 — Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:43:59 GMT

I could have told you that.

Reply #15

Chappie — Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:24:50 GMT

I have bought this system and have found it to be a complete load of bollocks. All that you get is a PDF file that tells you how to do the basic wheeling system and you can find that just about anywhere on the net. I've also built myself a spreadsheet on Excel that I've applied most formulae or buildable winning number systems that can be put into excel and I'm far surpassing anything with my theories than this so called Honest Lotto system ever did for me.SAVE YOUR MONEY

Reply #14

RJOh — Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:43:55 GMT

The only conditions the combinations had to fit were: The first eleven lines could not repeat a number. No combination could have matched 3 in past drawings.Your suggestion was that all numbers be used once before a number is used twice.If a person can't come up with a RNG to do the job, he can just put 56 numbers in a bag and randomly remove 5 at a time to make his combinations, if he doesn't like the mix he can keep throwing them back in until he gets what he wants. Where there's a will, th... [ More ]

Reply #13

BobP — Sun, 23 Oct 2005 05:08:35 GMT

I think you'd do better playing a smaller game, when isn't that true. ;-)Where can the avrage person get such a RNG if they don't write their own software? The CoverMaster program will only go down to a 2if wheel, no 1if. Besides you don't need a 1if wheel maker unless it can adjust parameters, as just using all the numbers one time is a 1if wheel. The trick is getting the balances right. It can take dozens to thousands of runs to get everything to fit together.I noticed you allowed 4 low or... [ More ]

Reply #12

RJOh — Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:52:46 GMT

The winning numbers were 11 17 28 29 36 +42 01 12 23 30 50 +26 06 13 24 28 53 +28 02 03 27 46 54 +32 07 31 33 47 55 +31 15 25 26 45 48 +14 04 11 29 34 37 +13 08 17 21 43 56 +06 14 16 39 44 51 +42 05 36 38 41 52 +43 10 20 32 40 42 +17 09 18 22 35 49 +02 03 14 19 24 35 +07Unfortunely the winning numbers had just matched 3 five draws back.

Reply #11

RJOh — Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:44:21 GMT

I used that RNG to come up with these 12 lines which I played in tonights MegaMillions. It also avoided any combinations that had matched combination of threes in past drawings. 01 12 23 30 50 +26 06 13 24 28 53 +28 02 03 27 46 54 +32 07 31 33 47 55 +31 15 25 26 45 48 +14 04 11 29 34 37 +13 08 17 21 43 56 +06 14 16 39 44 51 +42 05 36 38 41 52 +43 10 20 32 40 42 +17 09 18 22 35 49 +02 03 14 19 24 35 +07

Reply #10

RJOh — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 07:40:42 GMT

I do it with a RNG I wrote using GWBasic. I added a counter to limit the number of times the numbers are picked. Over the years I have also added features such as checking the picks with past drawings, checking sums, ranges and etc. You can also used a wheel which guarantee a match of one.

Reply #9

Tenaj — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:48:27 GMT

Repeats can be used to your advantage if you pay attention and keep some kind of record where you can see a pattern and remember them. Especailly if you play online. I say this over and over. Look how many times 306 have traveled this week in the states, 073 combo is bringing it. I know this because I've hit 306 in PA when 073 fell in NY. I laid in the cut for it, this last time. I spied 307 when it fell the first of the week. When I see 073 again, I'm going to play the hell out of 306 aga... [ More ]

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:32:53 GMT

Yeah...Honest lotto my behind.....That guy is trying to convince people that if you write a pencil and paper version of the equivalancy of a random generator, then eventually you will hit....When???? Who knows>>>>>>>>>.Ken Silver....He's honest alright....he'll tell you up front your gonna lose. Honesty...If you win a couple of dollars along the way, then WHOOP-DEE-DOO------............

Reply #7

BobP — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:21:54 GMT

Fair enough. How exactly would one go about doing that? BobP

Reply #6

RJOh — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 04:31:24 GMT

There would be far more winners if the lottery put a leash on their random number generator, such as making it use all the numbers before using any number a second time. If lotteries did that, their QPs wouldn't be totally random picks. If players want their numbers picked like that they can use a RNG on their home computers that follows that rule and make out cards.

Reply #5

BobP — Wed, 19 Oct 2005 03:10:51 GMT

There are a number of problems with just buying quick picks. There would be far more winners if the lottery put a leash on their random number generator, such as making it use all the numbers before using any number a second time. Due to this you can buy ten quick picks and only have two thirds of the lottery numbers among them. If you don't have all the winning numbers among them, a jackpot is not just unlikely, but impossible. If you want to win 8 or 9 times out of ten. Go here http://www.lo... [ More ]

Reply #4

sellitforsure — Wed, 19 Oct 2005 02:34:04 GMT

Ok, Guys What is the best system?IS thier a system that works or is it still just random chance?I think you can lesson the randomness but you cannot totallypick day end and day out the correct numbers unless you spendtwo or three hundred a play! Jerry

Reply #3

CASHMAN — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:39:58 GMT

Save your Money. It's a piece of

Reply #2

Pick-4_Master — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 16:33:33 GMT

Dont' buy it the System is a total waste of time and money I bought it in 2001 and thank goodness it was only $37 because after checking it out I realised that you would have to buy a good amount of tickets in order to possibly hit a Jackpot.Like $60 or more the concept behind it is okay but nothing special or innovative but in order for it too really work for you a lot of tickets will have to be purchased and that may still only get you a 4 number hit at the most anything more is very unlikely.... [ More ]

Reply #1

Todd — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:56:55 GMT

Discussed many, many times. Try using Search in the forums menu. Adjust the time period to search the past year, and search the message body for ken silver.

Honest Lotto System ?

sellitforsure — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 15:43:54 GMT

Hi Guys,Have any of you looked over the Honest lotto system by Ken Silver?I wanted to know how that works or is it BS! Jerry