Lottosync - remeber these words Marco ?

Reply #23

vick — Tue, 09 May 2006 18:45:23 GMT

i've also done this paurths, i have no idea why it sometimes hits; but as long as it gets results

Reply #22

paurths — Tue, 09 May 2006 17:17:34 GMT

Hi Vick,

yes, but by inputting wrong numbers, even if they differ a value of only 1, changes the structure of the draws to input .

Makes one wonder why 4 correct numbers were produced....

Grtz

Ricky

Reply #21

vick — Tue, 09 May 2006 16:56:19 GMT

true paurth, experimentation is always good

Reply #20

paurths — Tue, 09 May 2006 09:13:18 GMT

Yes, in 1.6 ( i switch between them to check the best results) it gave me 4 correct numbers, with samples 700.

Note 'tho that i had not input the real drawn numbers, but always just 1 off. (so if the last draw was 3 - 8- 21 - 30 - 36- 37/ 24 i input 4-9-22-31-37-38 and 25)

lol, but this way one can stay busy forever ....

Reply #19

vick — Tue, 09 May 2006 08:41:24 GMT

sometimes the lowest samples hit best !

----------------------

while it is good that Marco has responded to hosni i'm a little concerned he hasn't replied to many of us here or in emails, ie customers. Releasing info. through hosni does not seem appropiate for a business plan, but perhaps Marco is more of an artist and they can be forgiven .

Regardless, hosni is there any hint of his progress? 50 % done, 99 % etc etc

Reply #18

paurths — Tue, 09 May 2006 07:19:39 GMT

I had it run sample 100,000 last week, it took just less than 17 hours to complete, on a Pentium M 1600 MHZ.

The results were no better than sample 10,000...

Reply #17

BobP — Sun, 07 May 2006 04:54:29 GMT

This information is only for Lotto Sync owners sitting with what seems like worthless software waiting for version 1.8 DO NOT BUY 1.7 FOR THIS !!!

Lotto Sync 1.6 and 1.7 were made for a low odds Belgium game with a bonus number, NOT the giant U.S. and U.K. games and not for Pick-5 so this shouldn't get in the way of Prime Ticket Service for the big games.

What I suggest is using Lotto Sync 1.7 for the NSW 6/45 game which is 50 cents a ticket Au (Mon Wed) and pulls two bonus balls that he... [ More ]

Reply #16

MillionsWanted — Fri, 05 May 2006 21:53:48 GMT

He has promised too much and charged too much for his software.

That makes it hard for him to be able to release an improved enough version which makes people feel they get their money's worth.

If he charged 30-40 dollar instead of 80-120 dollar people would not have too much expectations of new versions of his software.

Reply #15

hosni — Fri, 05 May 2006 17:40:28 GMT

Yo BobP and others. I heard from Guru on 25 April. Here in part is his message: Some people ask me how it is possible that it takes so long to make an update of lottosync. The answer is... programming this update is only a tiny tiny fraction of the work I'm doing. The real deal is figuring out how to improve results and how to incorparate new findings in the engine. (and testing them endlessly ofcourse) It has gone far beyond what I initially planned. I know that waiting so long with a release... [ More ]

Reply #14

paul762 — Fri, 05 May 2006 10:29:01 GMT

Bob, if he was an honest guy the website wouldnt still be up, because the software is useless, 1.6 and 1.7.

I cant see any reason why it has taken so long because the last time he was here talking about 1.8 he was actually using it himself to play euromillions and posting winning tickets from his own lottery.

I wont believe LS1.8 is on its way until I see more proof, and only Marco can provide it.

Reply #13

BobP — Fri, 28 Apr 2006 05:26:27 GMT

LottoSync is still in business. The web site is still up. Marco is still working on v1.8 and will not be discussing progress until it is finished. BobP

Reply #12

paurths — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:52:49 GMT

Those links?

They just point to members.lotterypost.com/...

nothing wrong with that, is there

Reply #11

RJOh — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 15:29:02 GMT

I don't understand your question. Why should I start my own forum? Were you just posting to showcase the links in your signature

Reply #10

paurths — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:01:20 GMT

perhaps you should start your own forum...

Reply #9

paurths — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 06:30:16 GMT

Oops, powerfall , is that like.... advertising...? lol

Reply #8

RJOh — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 05:02:13 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on April 27, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on April 25, 2006 Lottosync has seen it best days, time to move on to something better.

Good luck.

Don't tell me you're finally ready to release your personal software, otherwise what do you consider better? BobP

I stand corrected, I should have said something newer. Since the last version of Lottosync, other programs have come on line making similar or better claims. I saw a promising one at powerfal... [ More ]

Reply #7

BobP — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:38:18 GMT

Don't tell me you're finally ready to release your personal software, otherwise what do you consider better? BobP

Reply #6

CSenior — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:13:37 GMT

Marco probably hit the jackpot and just disappeared...

Reply #5

time*treat — Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:05:02 GMT

Is v1.7 broken in some way

Reply #4

paul762 — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:09:50 GMT

RJOH - I think you might be right, I just wish it hadnt taken nearly 2 1/2 years for me to figure it out

Reply #3

RJOh — Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:52:31 GMT

Lottosync has seen it best days, time to move on to something better.

Good luck.

Reply #2

Raziel — Tue, 25 Apr 2006 22:48:45 GMT

Yes Marco what is taking you so long because we certainly have been patient.

Reply #1

vick — Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:03:10 GMT

yes indeed. Marco anything going on with 1.8

Lottosync - remeber these words Marco ?

paul762 — Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:34:03 GMT

Hello hello,

Marco is still here, and he's still working on 1.8 in silence

Patience, it will come as I promised...

Well those words were written nearly 6 months ago now, I just wondered if there was any progress etc.