Next Hot Lotto state

Reply #6

CASH Only — Wed, 17 May 2006 13:36:50 GMT

I don't care for computerized drawings either. But there are WORSE games that are ball-drawn.

Reply #5

Tnplayer805 — Wed, 17 May 2006 01:55:23 GMT

Sorry. If it's computer drawn I say NO DEAL

Reply #4

CASH Only — Tue, 16 May 2006 16:20:15 GMT

HL has been around for over four years, adding Kansas only two months ago, so it's proven itself, and it's not going away soon. Lose for Life is such a bad game; it's not worth playing even in VA.

Reply #3

JimmySand9 — Tue, 16 May 2006 01:34:13 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by CASH Only on May 13, 2006I voted OK since it's a new lottery, and it obviously will add more online games. NC is in much the same position (no online games yet) but there's a chance it will go for Lose for Life instead.

I seriously doubt NC will go for either Win For Life or Hot Lotto. They'll be too busy focusing on their in-state games like Pick 3, Pick 4, and Pick 5. What's more, if they ever do consider adding a second multi-state game, IMHO, both of those game... [ More ]

Reply #2

CASH Only — Sat, 13 May 2006 17:42:22 GMT

I voted OK since it's a new lottery, and it obviously will add more online games. NC is in much the same position (no online games yet) but there's a chance it will go for Lose for Life instead.

Reply #1

Just6ntlc — Sat, 13 May 2006 17:04:26 GMT

CASH Only, my vote is HL won't expand further. However, I think HL should go to Tuesday/Friday, not Wednesday/Saturday regardless if the game will go back to ball machine or not.

Next Hot Lotto state

CASH Only — Sat, 13 May 2006 16:49:41 GMT

HL started with six states in 2002. Two years later DC and North Dakota joined, with Kansas climbing on board in March.