<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mass. Megabucks Improvements.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/137203" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Mass. Megabucks Improvements.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #13</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/652656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/652656</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 00:09:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Tell that to the MA Lottery. Also tell that to the NY Lottery, as both have oodles of annuity-only scratches.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #12</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/651883</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/651883</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:15:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>justxploring</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I chose Cash option - FL has a 20 year annuity game (MegaMoney) with a cash option that pays around 65%, sometimes more since it&#x27;s pari-mutuel.  The starting jackpot is $500,000.  There should always be a cash option for players.</p>]]></description>
			<category>justxploring</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/639819</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/639819</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 02:22:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DoctorEw220</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  People are actually responding to this poll.  Also, CASHOnly:  Where&#x27;d your avatar go</p>]]></description>
			<category>DoctorEw220</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/637141</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/637141</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 03:57:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>DoctorEW220, I think MA should do the following in my proposal:<br /><br />A. Start the jackpot at $400,000 cash option guaranteed. They&#x27;ll announce the annunity jackpot<br /><br />B. Offer 2 tickets for $1, not 1 ticket for $1<br /><br />C. Offer a cash option</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/636470</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/636470</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 04:13:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DoctorEw220</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think MA needs to do the following:<br /><br />-Raise the starting jackpot.<br /><br />-Raise the matrix (to accomidate the jackpot raise).<br /><br />-Offer a cash option (Especially after that old lady sued to have her annuity turned into a lump sum).<br /><br />-Offer 2 tickets for $1 (That would be really nice.).<br /><br />- Move it to 3 draws a week (Monday, Wednesday, Saturday?).</p>]]></description>
			<category>DoctorEw220</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/635705</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/635705</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 12:03:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>noahproblem</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>And yet another unlucky winner again on Wednesday (6/28) - at least as the sole  winner&#x27;(?)  they get the  full  annuity ($20K/20, yay)...<br /><br />Maybe they should just give this one away to charity.</p>]]></description>
			<category>noahproblem</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/635486</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/635486</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 01:34:10 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, why don&#x27;t they just have a $200,000 starting cash jackpot instead?  I think the reason why, especially today, lotteries love to pay guaranteed annuities instead is so that they can guarantee lower cash jackpots when interest rates rise.  Of course, if interest rates fall (unlikely these days), they have to guarantee higher cash jackpots though.</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/635041</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/635041</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 15:02:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;ve been spending time lately in Orange County, NY, so I haven&#x27;t seen this poll. MA is the most corrupt lottery state (NY is a close second). Where else is there a $200,000 annuity with no cash option</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634588</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634588</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>My first vote or choice is Cash option/All-cash jackpot. This jackpot starts at $100000 [guaranteed] and continue to roll if their is no jackpot winner.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634378</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634378</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:18:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bellyache</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the same thing. That is silly to offer a $200,000 prize and not give the option of Cash. I&#x27;m sure CashOnly would agree.</p>]]></description>
			<category>bellyache</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634278</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634278</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:43:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ugh. Call me CASHOnly, but they need a cash option, especially after a payout like this.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634257</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634257</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:27:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>$200,000 annuity? how sad</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634056</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203/634056</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 05:47:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bellyache</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would defintely not want to get a $200,000 jackpot in installments. I would think rasiing the jackpot and adding a cash option would be a good thing. I don&#x27;t think however that they would raise the jackpot and then do 2 plays for a buck.</p>]]></description>
			<category>bellyache</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mass. Megabucks Improvements.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/137203</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 04:34:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DoctorEw220</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Ok, now I&#x27;m not usually one to complain about this game.  In fact, I like this game, but when I saw that two people had to split the starting jackpot at this game, I thought that was bullcrap.  Think about it.  They split a $400,000 annuity.  They get $200,000 in 20 annual installments.  That&#x27;s a mere $10,000 a year before taxes.  I really think that this game needs improving.  What do you think is the best way though</p>]]></description>
			<category>DoctorEw220</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

