<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Pick3s into pick6? Another view.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/139552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Pick3s into pick6? Another view.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659311</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659311</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 15:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>EXCALIBUR</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>While not all filters are of value or use when used with that new technique, there are more filters such as  Digits Differences (Widths) or gaps  that can be used and or are of real fitering value.<br /><br />How much EXTRA reduction can be won in this new way?<br /><br />I don&#x27;t know yet, but it seems to be significant and enough to make a good difference in pick 3 combos reduction.<br /><br />Numberic filters might be of more value and use for this maybe than filters that use letters as symbols.<br /><br />It is a new thing... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659311">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>EXCALIBUR</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659302</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659302</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:54:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>EXCALIBUR</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>These can also be used with states that have only 1 pick 3 draw a day, just combine 1 daily draw with the next daily draw in the same ways as above.<br /><br />This is not a complete pick 3 filters method in itself, but just extra help to be used with regular filter techniques.<br /><br />It just gives additional filtering and any extra help is needed, this is just sort of deductive and tricky work, my filters work uses filters tricks.</p>]]></description>
			<category>EXCALIBUR</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659294</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659294</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 14:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>EXCALIBUR</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It just came to me that this filters technique can really be used and even without special software, just with regular pick 3 filters programs or program and the right way is a is below, but not used in the way that it appears.<br /><br />I figured the  Secret  way in which it can be used, Can you?<br /><br />The secret is to predict only the very next Midday or evening draw (Single, not combined), (Only one of them at one time, whichever is next to come out) based on the last 2 combined draws (Pick6) and on th... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552/659294">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>EXCALIBUR</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Pick3s into pick6? Another view.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 04:49:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>EXCALIBUR</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>This is so you won&#x27;t miss LANTERN too much as he is no more.<br /><br />A new game? A 0 to 9 pick 6 daily game in two parts?<br /><br />It&#x27;s possible for (Maybe) for those states that have 2 daily draws.<br /><br />Perhaps to predict the next 2 daily draws at the same time or together.<br /><br />Crazy? Maybe.<br /><br />Would there be any benefit to predicting in this way?<br /><br />I don&#x27;t know, maybe.<br /><br />But there is no filters program to deal with this new way, so it can&#x27;t be tested.<br /><br />How many possible combinations for this new way? 10x10x10x10x10x1... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/139552">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>EXCALIBUR</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

