<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>PB lower odds = greater payout than MM??</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/142172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: PB lower odds = greater payout than MM??</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686267</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686267</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:39:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>While Powerball&#x27;s annuity jackpots start at $15 million and Mega Millions&#x27; annuity jackpots start at $12 million, their cash jackpots start at approximately the same value ($7 million average).</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686255</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686255</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:01:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Prob988 -<br /><br />I&#x27;ve never worked out a probability table for MM or PB - just too much time and disk space what with all the possibilities. I have worked one out for the 6/49 lottery matrix. But it&#x27;d be an interesting workout doing one from the possibility of rollovers. Maybe when I get some time.....<br /><br />You may be correct regarding the chances of multiple winners but then you&#x27;d have to dial in the possibility of a rollover, which would have a tendency to minimize or even negate that factor.<br /><br />Spo... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686255">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686098</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686098</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:23:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Prob988</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The expectation value is, by definition, very much a function of probability, including the probability that there will be more than one winner, which obviously effects the potential size of the grand prize.<br /><br />As a first approximation, though, because of the exceptionally long odds, the case where the probability of multiple winners exceeds the probability of one winner, is very unusual.    In the new matrices, I don&#x27;t recall that such a case has ever prevailed.<br /><br />The expectation values for lo... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686098">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Prob988</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686045</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686045</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:56:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Raven62</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>FYI the MegaMillions Jackpot starts at: $12 Million</p>]]></description>
			<category>Raven62</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686040</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/686040</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 15:38:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Agreed if cash value is your only consideration. I don&#x27;t quite understand why you&#x27;d factor in probability, though, since the expected value is computed on a specific occurance rather than all possibilities.<br /><br />gl<br /><br />j</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685918</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685918</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:17:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Prob988</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You are relying on annuity values - which in my estimation are worthless.<br /><br />I track cash values.    I also account for the probability distribution of various winners.    On November 11, 2005, the advertised annuity for MM was $315M, cash was around $180 and ticket sales were around 105M.   The expectation value was around 1.09.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Prob988</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685913</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685913</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In actuality, the expectation value reaches 1.0 at substantially lower jackpot values. I didn&#x27;t take the time to do the exact math, but Powerball reaches a 1.0 value at around $118 million. MegaMillions must reach $144 million before a 1.0 expectation value is attained.<br /><br />With its higher starting jackpot of $15 million, Powerball offers a minimum payout percentage of 29.98% vs. MegaMillions $10 million minimum jackpot and a minimum payout percentage of 23.89%. This is despite the higher payouts... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685913">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685879</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685879</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 05:31:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvdiva</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Well if you like hitting a jackpot of less than 50 million Megamillions is great. For those seeking more you can always play something else. No wonder WA state had to pass a no gambling on the internet bill.<br /><br />At least there is the 6/49 game in BC but judging from the current jackpot of 24M I&#x27;d doubt it would roll to the thirties.</p>]]></description>
			<category>dvdiva</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685850</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685850</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 04:09:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Just6ntlc</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Prob988 on this one. PB has lower odds but a better reward chance than MM.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Just6ntlc</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685649</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685649</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 18:55:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Prob988</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>One can calculate an expectation value, which is the potential reward vs. the risk (i.e. the odds).<br /><br />In general, if the cash values are equal, the expectation value for PB is better than that of MM.  However this is not always the case.<br /><br />The expectation value of either game seldom rises above 1.00, at which point the game is considered a good bet.   Because of long odds, such a value is only approached when the jackpot is in the $300 million annuity range.<br /><br />It is not possible however to as... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172/685649">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Prob988</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>PB lower odds = greater payout than MM??</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/142172</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:47:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>m3g4m1ll10ns</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Not that it matters...<br /><br />The last 100 PB jackpots have paid out approximately 1.8 billion more than MM.  That&#x27;s an average of 18 million more per drawing!<br /><br />And MM&#x27;s new matrix was touted as the game that could finally reach a 500 million dollar jackpot!?!<br /><br />Yeah, right</p>]]></description>
			<category>m3g4m1ll10ns</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

