<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog Enries.</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/144805</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/144805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Blog Enries.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/144805/710486</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/144805/710486</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Raven62</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Twenty some odd respondants out of 48,000 LP Members hardly seems like a lot of participation in the poll.<br /><br />Blogs may be able to be cleaned up by archiving the Blog entries you have updated with more recent material. In that way the material is still available in the archive instead of deleted forever.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Raven62</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blog Enries.</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/144805</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/144805</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:40:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tntea</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Could it be possible to set up the blogs where authors can go in and clean up their blogs with the ability to delete old enries or at least make them private?<br /><br />I took a poll on this and seems that lots of members would like that.<br /><br />If a member goes back to standard membership, will their blogs be cleaned out</p>]]></description>
			<category>tntea</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

