Let's Make Friends With the Pick 3 System

Reply #30

sfilippo — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:04:28 GMT

I kinda got off track there didn't I?

Been awful busy with the Pick 4. writing programs and fiddling around with new ideas. It's endless.

Reply #29

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:06:12 GMT

Got a few things going with pick 4 as well using vtracs.. backtesting some states now before I post..

Got to love these NUMBERS..

Reply #28

lottolaughs — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 02:13:49 GMT

Love this whole test you've got going on here,tntea! Thanks for your interest and will keep watching to see what happens! Very curious to see how CA will do

Reply #27

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:35:58 GMT

Drawing DatePick 3Pick 4

MiddayEveningMiddayEvening

Mon, Jan 8, 20070-6-8

Sun, Jan 7, 20077-0-15-7-1

Sat, Jan 6, 20072-3-69-2-7

Fri, Jan 5, 20075-3-16-9-9

CA warning.. 661 161. 251 256 205

Reply #26

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:35:55 GMT

Drawing DatePick 3Pick 4

MiddayEveningMiddayEvening

Mon, Jan 8, 20070-6-8

Sun, Jan 7, 20077-0-15-7-1

Sat, Jan 6, 20072-3-69-2-7

Fri, Jan 5, 20075-3-16-9-9

CA warning.. 661 161. 251 256 205

Reply #25

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:30:09 GMT

Drawing DatePick 3Pick 4

MiddayEveningMiddayEvening

Mon, Jan 8, 20078-8-29-1-34-7-7-52-2-0-3

Sun, Jan 7, 20075-3-65-2-97-4-9-84-9-2-6

Sat, Jan 6, 20076-3-17-9-06-2-6-42-3-7-6

your PA warning... I am shooting for 472 here in PA for next few days.. 56 61 42 27 hot pairs coming.. 93 pair may repeat..

Reply #24

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:27:46 GMT

Drawing DatePick 3Pick 4

MiddayEveningMiddayEvening

Mon, Jan 8, 20071-4-91-4-54-9-3-89-6-8-5

Sun, Jan 7, 20079-5-69-6-75-2-4-17-6-8-3

Your warning for Missouri Liking 356 especially.. looking for 35 pairs and 97 pairs coming soon..

Reply #23

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:24:06 GMT

DatePick 3Pick 4

MiddayEveningMiddayEvening

Mon, Jan 8, 20070-2-95-0-66-3-1-99-1-8-2

Sun, Jan 7, 20079-1-17-4-62-5-9-20-9-4-2

Your TS warning on the repeated position system..

574 740 054 094 804

Reply #22

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:20:55 GMT

Drawing DatePick 3Pick 4

MiddayEveningMiddayEvening

Mon, Jan 8, 20079-7-74-7-58-6-6-18-5-5-9

Sun, Jan 7, 20078-3-60-4-6-1

Sat, Jan 6, 20075-0-89-3-90-4-7-06-1-5-2

Fri, Jan 5, 20077-2-08-5-01-9-0-81-0-5-5

Thu, Jan 4, 20077-2-03-8-37-3-5-62-8-3-7

Wed, Jan 3, 20076-2-85-5-84-3-3-42-8-4-5

Tue, Jan 2, 20074-9-55-4-89-7-9-22-4-2-1

TN came through with repeated position system as discussed above...

Reply #21

tntea — Tue, 09 Jan 2007 01:17:29 GMT

, Jan 8, 20073-5-78-7-94-0-4-40-6-4-4

Sat, Jan 6, 20070-7-13-5-63-4-4-58-0-3-5

Fri, Jan 5, 20076-1-37-8-48-9-7-91-3-7-7

Thu, Jan 4, 20070-8-79-4-41-8-6-96-1-6-3

OHIO came through with the repeated position set-up as mentioned in this post.. Numbers were discussed in Chat last night.. Hope others took advantage of this opportunity..

Reply #20

tntea — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 02:51:42 GMT

Great Post LottoLaughs..

There is so much to learn with the history of draws..

I am backtesting what I will call repeated position

What I do is look for a position on the result page that was repeated.. for example if

321

024 falls.. The position II was repeated with the two.. Then I make pairs with the 14, 03 to come up with a number to play for the next few days.. Back testing has shown that sometimes within a week.. 104 013 431 etc will come out.. Now this is somethi... [ More ]

Reply #19

lottolaughs — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 02:35:21 GMT

Gus,this is for you.

An example here so we are clear about the followers. I was just reading my answer to you and I can see how this could be misinterpreted. When I'm saying followers I'm refering to what your add-on's would be in relation to the drawing number,again for your 784. Not how they would be if you had gone through all the results and done them number to number but what you would have had to add on to 784 to get them.

Take for example a past result from CA.

724

These were... [ More ]

Reply #18

lottolaughs — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:46:45 GMT

Hey,Jack,good to hear from you. Know you've been busy with your system and so glad to see that it's available. Can't wait to see what you've come up with!

Thanks for the info. Every little bit helps

Reply #17

lottolaughs — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:44:15 GMT

Welcome to the Post,Gus! Thanks for visiting here!

Sounds like you understand perfectly. If you've got your follower numbers all mapped out,you've got it easy! That's what I'm working on too.

One more hint--you might want to also write out your add-on's from a whole week's worth of followers from your number, in this case 784. That will give you MORE add-on's to work with and perhaps find even more of a pattern. That's what I'm hoping to find. Let me know what happens for you,thanks... [ More ]

Reply #16

lottolaughs — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 00:19:50 GMT

How are you doing over here,Steve? I see that 306 hit midday today. You have 360. But that's not the column you are watching,is it

Reply #15

LottoHackJack — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 18:50:05 GMT

When dissecting a lotto database to look for patterns in this manner, the rearranging of the draw combo pattern is one of the first things I do also before performing any operations on them and logging the results for the last 50 to 100 draws. First I put in order and use the smallest to largest digits in the combo, then the largest to smallest. Then I use the remaining combinatoric ways to construct the same combo in different orders.

I proceed by using the actual draw combo as ABC, foll... [ More ]

Reply #14

Gus P — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:46:55 GMT

BTW, I rarely have enough money to play, but the 23X pattern was so convincing that I may just decide to play 91 front pair tonight :-P

Reply #13

Gus P — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:14:39 GMT

Actually, now that I've read it over a few times, I think I understand what Lottolaughs is getting at in their fourth post, with the formula box...

I want to see if I understand it, so I'll use last night's Ohio evening number, 784... Looking back through the results, the add-ons for all the other times 784 were drawn were:

234

024

679

231

237

235

740

Off the bat, I can see that four of the seven start with 23-, so I can start off with that. Making some educated picks from the... [ More ]

Reply #12

Gus P — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 07:38:15 GMT

Hi... I just joined LP, and I'm just having a difficult time digesting all these prediction methods and systematics that people are talking about. For instance, when I see several rows or columns of numbers, I have no idea how they came up with those numbers and what you're supposed to do with them...

Anyway, just before I joined, I had actually compiled Ohio's Pick 3 history in Excel, so in about a minute, I'd done the methodology discussed in the initial post of this thread for all 8,462 e... [ More ]

Reply #11

sfilippo — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 00:13:36 GMT

Georgia6-5-95-9-40-5-1-4

594 = 459 = skip = 14 = +3 <no match

Reply #10

sfilippo — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 16:07:08 GMT

I want to test Georgia for tonight. I did a workout on the last month and took the top 9 skips.

It's a 90 number grid, but I will try to pick which 4 columns to play using Drawing Statistics for

Georgia's Evening game. I used the default setting of 50 days and the highest ranked 4 digits are

5, 9, 8, and 2. So, I'll watch those four columns for tonight.

--1----2----3----4----5----6----7----8----9---0

123 234 345 456 567 678 789 890 901 012

145 256 367 478 589 690 701 812 923... [ More ]

Reply #9

lottolaughs — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 02:01:07 GMT

I know you've done tons more research and work with the pick 3 so I trust your opinion. That's interesting. For some reason I always believe going back to the beginning and starting from day 1 would give a more accurate view but then again you also have to consider how patterns change and such so that makes sense. The current behavior would definitely rear it's head within 3 to 6 months. Great insight there,Steve. Appreciate your input

Reply #8

sfilippo — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:46:54 GMT

You know Lottolaughs,

I think 3 to 6 months would probably be enough to

get an idea of the behavior of the game.

Reply #7

lottolaughs — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:43:09 GMT

You've been busy,Steve! Love your spin on how you're looking at this and what you're doing. Keep us posted please. Do you feel we need to do the whole history to get an accurate add on's? Or do you think you can get away with doing less

Reply #6

lottolaughs — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:33:50 GMT

More ways to analyze this data after you are finished getting your add on numbers......

#1--For each number individually, go back and count how many times you had to +1+2,etc. to it to get the next drawing. I'm sure after awhile there will be some sort of pattern. For example, say that after all of your 7's, you find a lot of +1's or +2's. Track this column by column first then you can go back and perhaps put all the 7's together and see what you come out with. So then we will know that when... [ More ]

Reply #5

sfilippo — Fri, 05 Jan 2007 01:22:11 GMT

Here's where I'm going with this..

The first number is the straight pick

The second number is the same pick reordered from low to high digits

skip

The third number is the difference between the second numbers digits

For instance, 899. From 8 to 9 = 1 and from 9 to 9 = 0. So the third number is 1 and 0 or 10

For instance, 569. From 5 to 6 = 1 and from 6 to 9 = 3. So the third number is 1 and 3 or 13

The fourth number is the difference between the third number.

For instance... [ More ]

Reply #4

lottolaughs — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:21:52 GMT

How ya doin', Stavros? Only 3290 drawings? Awww,you got it easy! I'm working on almost 7,000,haha.

I think Steve's idea is fantastic! That way you can look at it from another angle. The more ways we can study our numbers, the better.

Thanks for starting on FLORIDA! Take your time! I'm planning this as my ongoing project for 2007. Hopefully, by next year at this time we will be well on our way to understanding our games better and be able to predict more winners

Reply #3

lottolaughs — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:15:57 GMT

Thanks for stopping by,Steve! And that's a GREAT idea about reordering the picks from smallest to largest number! Thought of doing it that way too, and will when time permits. Can't hurt to do it both ways!

Patterns,patterns,patterns! You are so correct. This will definitely show some new ones that maybe we haven't seen before.

Thanks for attempting OKLAHOMA. Good luck and can't wait to hear what you find out. I'm sure OK. can't wait either

Reply #2

stavros — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:07:20 GMT

I'll work on this for FL, but there are 3290 drawings to do this for and will take some time. You know I'm always in on your new ideas . What do you think of Steve's idea above

Reply #1

sfilippo — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 23:02:11 GMT

I think this is a great system.

I'll do Oklahoma's history, but with a little twist.

I'm going to reorder the picks according to numeric sequence.

So, pick 924 becomes 249; pick 821 becomes 128; ect...

I want to reoder them so when I do the frogger math from one to the other,

I can focus on reoccurring patterns in the math.

Then I might be able to see which addition sequences happen more frequently.

Plus, I need something like this to keep my brain busy. I ain't gettin' no y... [ More ]

Let's Make Friends With the Pick 3 System

lottolaughs — Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:50:34 GMT

I don't know about you folks,but right now I think of the lottery as my enemy.

Something is telling me to get to know it better and become more friendly.

Bet a lot of you feel like that, hands up who do!!

So how do we go about making the big bad wolf our new best friend?

This is something I've been working on and thought I'd share for others who may be so inclined. First off,it will take quite a bit of time. Maybe you have some way to figure this out faster but I... [ More ]