lottosync prediction jan 13 bc/49

Reply #8

vick — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 03:29:09 GMT

True Paul, the 1 quirk with 1.6 is that it didn't pick repeaters , and the 1.7 problem is that it didn't pick numbers higher than 35 most of the time.

Still you were 1off's on both. Good enough to try again

Reply #7

paul762 — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 20:52:43 GMT

Ha-Ha you couldnt make this stuff up I tell ya!

21 and 35 came out - DOH!

Its worth noting however that I wouldnt have got number 21 anyway because LS1.6 doesnt predict numbers that came out in the previous draw perhaps thats why it gave me 20 instead of 21.

Reply #6

paul762 — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:55:00 GMT

Oh for sure, my numbers are already done, they are 20 and 34.

I will be placing the wager tomorrow morning.

Reply #5

vick — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:32:09 GMT

i like 60 to 1 odds .

so your going to try this method this Sat. then

Reply #4

paul762 — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 20:12:46 GMT

Yes Vick, this is what I have been trying lately and it would have worked out on wednesday night on the irish lotto where LS1.6 selected the best two numbers to play which were 2 and 6 and they both came out, paying 60/1.

Reply #3

vick — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:09:55 GMT

Paul so you run it through a few times and see which ones are the same most and use those? I may try that to.

Reply #2

paul762 — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:31:55 GMT

I think Guru initially used a 500 sample for his Belgian lotto, as a rule of thumb I used to use 490 sample if it was a 49 number game, 450 sample for the irish 45 number game etc. etc.

However I have found that using 150 sample and doing a number of predictions and then using the best numbers from those predictions is working for me at the moment.

Reply #1

MillionsWanted — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 01:01:45 GMT

Good luck!

How many samples did Guru originally recommend to use when predicting

lottosync prediction jan 13 bc/49

luckyhorse — Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:35:14 GMT

here they are folks with the same sample size 400 9-13-14-16-17-18-30-40-42-45 good luck everyone