I give up ! ILL ...4 doubles in a row

Reply #37

Peach3 $treet — Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:41:12 GMT

(in red)

Posted Tuesday afternoon:

IL combined has now tied her all-time record for most skips without a total sum 5-10 with 25 skips.

29 singles in that group:

014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 034, 035, 036, 037, 045, 046, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 134, 135, 136, 145, 234, 235

55 boxes altogether in that group:

005, 006, 007, 008, 009, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 033, 034, 035, 036, 037, 044, 045, 046, 055, 113, 114,

Reply #36

ALX — Wed, 24 Jan 2007 00:32:53 GMT

Wow!! What's also a little wild is that except for the 0-9-9, there are no consecutives or mirrors! Got to stop this madness soon. Gottta be two triples in a row next, lol! Something with 2-3-4-1 maybe. Who says the Lottery doesn' mess around.

Reply #35

Peach3 $treet — Tue, 23 Jan 2007 21:22:08 GMT

Absolutely perfect, WIN D!! LOL

I didn't respond to this earlier, but, believe me, I was LMAO from the moment I first saw it the other night.

And yes, speaking for myself, I was OK, and I'm still OK, even after that dadgum unlucky 7th double last night. Stuff happens.

As we all need to remind ourselves from time to time........ it's gambling.

....... Also, I thought it might be a good idea to repost in this thread some up-to-date IL stats from another thread.

May....o... [ More ]

Reply #34

Best Picks — Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:27:48 GMT

just got home from work, system was down and now i know why. i expected to c an increase in my account but i c this

Mon, 22 Jan 20077-9-7

Sun, 21 Jan 20074-8-8

Sat, 20 Jan 2007 5-8-8

Fri, 19 Jan 2007 3-7-7

Thu, 18 Jan 2007 9-9-3

Wed, 17 Jan 2007 0-9-9

Tue, 16 Jan 2007 3-6-6

I know this playing around IL is doing has got to stop. This ain't right. 7dbls in a row. Somebody help me.

Reply #33

Best Picks — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:30:47 GMT

NO I ain't OK. What the ? 6 dbls in a row.

i c it was one of the str8's but how could it be another double. I went with the 4's. I guess there is 2morrow.

Reply #32

WIN D — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:30:30 GMT

That's what we get for using a Filter ..... Remember ,, never use filters. LOL

See there it was before the filters ....

100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 162, 163, 164, 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172,... [ More ]

Reply #31

WIN D — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:24:11 GMT

I'm OK.... are you OK ?

488 double ! 6 doubles in a row!

.. one of the 400 showed up....1,2,4,7 only it was a double.

Reply #30

dumars798 — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:24:15 GMT

Winn D...WERE those tripple 222's

Reply #29

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:23:18 GMT

I really liked seeing this worked out with all the options... Thanks Peach.

Thanks Win D. My pleasure

Reply #28

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:12:51 GMT

Peach ..... you got that right. How many times will we have both a stack o f doubles 5 High.....at the same time as a stack of Mostly/all HIGHs ....7 numbers deep ? Yeap

Just to see the Staights filtered down to the Box option.... here are the 56 boxes. 56 x .25 = 14.00

019, 028, 037, 046, 127, 136, 145, 235, 029, 047, 128, 137, 146, 236, 245, 048, 129, 138, 147, 237, 246, 345, 012, 049, 139, 148, 238, 247, 346, 013, 149, 239, 248, 347, 014, 023, 249, 348, 015, 024, 123, 349, 016,... [ More ]

Reply #27

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:56:01 GMT

That's right Win D....56 boxes.

And that stack is definitely something else that should be in our favor. Your take has gotta be my gut instinct on this also.

$58 outlay that has good potential for a super-sweet return. Opportunities like this don't come along very often.

Consider this.......Even if tonight's a total bust, we could still possibly consider going exactly the same route for a few more night draws. We'd have to like your chances of ultimately breaking even with this... [ More ]

Reply #26

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:30:02 GMT

Thats the only way to go with this i guess Peach. Makes for the best odds bet with what we have.

It is our good fortune that the last 7 draws at night have all been mostly/all HIGH ...... so if we cut those out at least we have these....

176 straights..... 176 x.25 = 44 bucks

102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 120, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 142, 143, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152, 153, 154, 160... [ More ]

Reply #25

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:06:11 GMT

Just wondering Win D...... if we played half these straights, what filter would you suggest? Oldest singles? Mostly/all low? Some other filter?

If we played mostly/all low, selecting from these 288, we'd have these 176 straights:

102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 120, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 142, 143, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152, 153, 154, 160, 162, 163, 164, 170, 172, 173, 174, 180, 182, 183, 184, 190, 192, 193, 194, 2... [ More ]

Reply #24

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:35:05 GMT

Thats right .... i just went to use my old stuff and got the same thing. Thats what you get when you try to do it on the fly like above. Well.... that puts a little different spin on that if we can't filter it down any more than that .... I would just as soon play half the straights ....and go for a 50/50 chance at a straight hit for the cost dif.

I'm gonna go back and see what i was doing wrong... I thought there would be a lot more cross over(repeat) Box wise that we could cut out.... [ More ]

Reply #23

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:09:41 GMT

Hmmmmm Win D..... ?????.....maybe I'm doing something wrong, or misunderstanding, but I'm showing that you're right about the 288 straight singles:

102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 120, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 142, 143, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150, 152, 153, 154, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 162, 163, 164, 165, 167, 168, 169, 170, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, 178, 179, 180, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 189, 190, 192, 193, 194, 195, 196,... [ More ]

Reply #22

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:50:24 GMT

Excellent Peach...

Now I guess we could filter out all the double Straights and Boxe doubles too... at the very least. Dare we? Yes we better dare at least that much of a filter huh? LOL

I feel like this is really the beginning of a great new play toy.

Lets see.... any straight column we want to cull down to Boxe form. That would end up as 12 singles ...9 doubles and 1 trip (per missing digit or column) yes?

So straight wise we are looking at...

Reply #21

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:32:48 GMT

Glad to do what I can, WIN D. I'm fortunate enough to still have a working copy of MikeK's Crunch2 program (which has kind of a bad name here at LP because of support issues).

Coming up with those specific 400 straights on command with this software is a breeze. These are the 400 we're looking for in Illinois tonight:

100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133,... [ More ]

Reply #20

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:07:17 GMT

Thank you Peach. You are sure right about that....it is very interesting. This could be really good ....a whole new filter group.

Just out of curiosity ....how quickly could you come up with the 400 straights on command? Not that you need to right now... but if you wanted to ..... could you and how easy would it be? What method would you use. Then.... how easy to convert those to Boxes

Reply #19

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 17:31:40 GMT

Good afternoon, WIN D.

I did some checking on this subject, while updating my AZ, CA and CT versabet databases. In the process of updating CT eve, I discovered this:

My apologies for the somewhat confusing presentation, (forget the chart LOL I couldn't get it to post correctly, but you can take my word for it, or check CT's recent draw history here:

http://www.betslips.com/pastnumbers.aspx?state=CT The stats below should be accurate)

but I hope you'll be able to see that digits... [ More ]

Reply #18

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 16:25:37 GMT

Howdy Rick.... Fred and Ginger huh? LOL

I really like what Ginger Rogers said one time ..... she had about enough of Fred this .....and Fred that... He's so wonderful ..conversation finally got to her a little bit over the years I guess.

Anyway.... Ginger said this....

People forget.... I had to perform the exact same dance steps as Fred did.... the exact same dance steps..... Only... I had to do them all backwards LOL

She was quite a woman

Reply #17

Rick G — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 15:59:50 GMT

Chaz, funny thread.... the crap heads got the best of you guys last night. The good news is you all have a stronger shot tonight. One word of caution though...Sunday and doubles in IL are like Fred and Ginger. Hope for your sake they're dancing solo tonight.

I'll go with the '1' in first position.

Good luck everyone

Reply #16

Best Picks — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 04:22:30 GMT

2 bullets yes sir. I feel we gonna start the week off right with a win in IL on sunday. Got to start the research.

Reply #15

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 04:20:21 GMT

Hey WIN D..... That's about all I've got right now, bud.

If I do come up with anything more, that's pertinent, I'll be sure to let ya know, here in this spot. Please do the same. I'll be watching.

.........kinda numbers-drained at the moment LOL

>Peach

Reply #14

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 04:09:00 GMT

Now really..... ya have to wonder. 1,2,4....or 7 missing 17 draws.

Like a dream or something. Not real ..... LOL

Thats why me and BP always bring 2 bullets with us ...right BP ? LOL

I got a new toy outta this deal....right Keith? This will be interesting to research. Peach... you have any more general data on this

Reply #13

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:56:58 GMT

You are crackin' me up WIN D :)) Love it! LOL

I did do a random spot check on some stretches of IL eve history using Versabet, and 13 skips was the previous most out for any 4 digits in the first position (that I spotted). Just from those spot checks I ran, I'd guess 10 to 13 skips would be a typical max out.

Actually, I just happened to notice that rarity as I was updating IL, after seeing your singles alert. It's a stat I've never really paid attention before, but it would definite... [ More ]

Reply #12

JAP69 — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:55:45 GMT

Reply #11

Jorli D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:47:12 GMT

RESULTS: 588 3536

Reply #10

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:30:05 GMT

OK....LOL .....

at least you didn't pick a double to hit! I always wait for someone to pop up with one of those right about now.

I wish I coulda played all the 400 straights starting with a digit 1,2,4, or 7

Really.....

Reply #9

tntea — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:17:01 GMT

I like 519 in IL

Reply #8

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 03:16:20 GMT

I just can't believe that ..... I see it but .... that can't be right. None of those digits have hit in 1st position since Jan 3rd ! That really is 400 numbers (straights) missing for 16 days.

Has anyone ever seen this before? Anyone?

Really.... someone call a Cop... LOL

If we had a lot of money Peach.... we would be Rich! LOL I never thought i would see the day that playing 400 straights would make sence. I still can't wrap my brain around this one....

1-19-2007... [ More ]

Reply #7

WIN D — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:38:50 GMT

Good Gravy Peach.... 9000 draws. 14 max....

That kinda stat is just ........ ........ ...... great. Even if they do over extend again...it's nice to see how they perform around old high water marks.

digit s 1,2,4,7,,,, 400 numbers missing 16 draws... now those make me a little dizzy. I really don't see how that happens.

In fact..... now that i think about that one ..... If I was a Lottery Cop I would have to say .... .Pull it over and look that 400 deal over.... [ More ]

Reply #6

Peach3 $treet — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:40:15 GMT

Thanks WIN D....... Hope I'm not cluttering the issue, but here's something else to add to the brew:

Spanning over 9,000 IL eve games, max out for the total sum 0-12 group (doubles, singles, and trips) has been 14.

Current eve skips for that group now = 10 skips.

All 50 singles included in that group:

012, 013, 014, 015, 016, 017, 018, 019, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 034, 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 045, 046, 047, 048, 056, 057, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 134, 135, 1... [ More ]

Reply #5

cps10 — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:15:14 GMT

Free money waiting to happen, WIN D

Reply #4

Best Picks — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 00:12:25 GMT

i hope it comes thru for u 2night WIN D. If it don't

I'll be waiting.

Reply #3

WIN D — Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:49:31 GMT

Good insurance ALX against a double attack tonight. Wide open as far as Pick 3 chances go.... as close as we can get anyway.

ILL has only had one other stack of doubles in 1 yr llike this 4 stack.

In the short term ... no 2 digit return at night in ILL since Dec 22.... average is every 12 days.

So... 37 coming off that draw last night

The nice part of this one tonight?.... ILL just had 6 mostly/all High in a row. Half the 120 singles are Mostly'All Low.

Reply #2

ALX — Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:32:50 GMT

Cannot wait to see this WIN D!! Might actually feel like someone other than a crap head again. Yeeha

Reply #1

WIN D — Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:26:28 GMT

.....028, 046, 127, 145, 235, 029, 038, 047, 128, 146, 236, 245, 048, 129, 138, 147, 237, 246, 345, 012, 049, 148, 238, 247, 346, 149, 239, 248, 347, 014, 023, 249, 348, 015, 024, 123, 349, 025, 034, 124, 026, 035, 125, 134, 018, 027, 045, 126, 135, 234

50 x .25 = 12.50

concentrate on out digits ... 4,2,,8,,5

347 029, 146, 129, 247, 239, 045 .....leaners

I give up ! ILL ...4 doubles in a row

WIN D — Sat, 20 Jan 2007 22:58:59 GMT

ILL .... 4 doubles in a row.

The best bet in Pick Three....

We're just a bunch of selfish crap heads right. Don't tell anyone else!

Take at least 2 bullets with you .....just in case. Like taking candy from a baby.