The Anti-Quick Pick System

Reply #19

JADELottery — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 23:06:03 GMT

I'm thinking about including some kind of Anti-Quick Pick/Quick Pick Analysis Function with the New Draw Analysis Tool in JADE LSG.

It would do something similar to what I've described here.

Reply #18

jarasan — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:32:40 GMT

JL,

This method is not anti-quick pick, but a quick-pick of a quick-pick. I have used a very similar technique out of pure frustration, just to try something different. Two weeks ago I went out to play keno and I wanted some sets of numbers, so I used the rng on lottery post and generated 5 lines of 10 numbers, then simply drew diagonal lines through the five rows so that I had 5 sets of 5 numbers. I took those and played 5x5spots first game, guess what ? I hit a 5 of 5 and a 3 of 5

Reply #17

JADELottery — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:23:02 GMT

line E, line E? there are 2 posts that have a line E. What post are you referring to, 1st or 2nd

Reply #16

LckyLary — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:16:57 GMT

A little fuzzy on this one. I don't get why not line E? The RNG used in the ticket machine is a different mechanism than used in NON-computerized draws. I'd only use QP when the drawings are computerized because then at least it's a similar method.

Reply #15

JADELottery — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 22:09:25 GMT

As I said before, this depends on your lottery. What you should do first is get some QP's(any amount you can afford) and analyze them for a peroid of time then see how many lines may be needed to get a resonable amout of Exclusion Numbers. I've found that for my lottery, a 6/49 lottery, that about 1 to 3 lines are good and the quantity of QP's does not matter. Could be $2.00, could be $200.00 or some where in between. For now, sample reasonably and examine. You'll get a feel for your lottery's... [ More ]

Reply #14

Badger — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:26:19 GMT

Yeah, the bank is pretty meager.

Reply #13

Pilot — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:20:12 GMT

Jade,

This method you describe got me interested because of the game I play, it's NY Pick 10,

Keno 10/20/80...because I have to eliminate 60-70 numbers each drawing it seemed like a fun short-cut, Pick 10 is so baffling because of the repeats and flag formations, it makes you think picking the right numbers is easy-about 60-75% of all the drawn numbers come from the last 3 drawings...needless to say it is NOT a cakewalk, but challenging and fun anyway. Would I be better off buying like 6 QP... [ More ]

Reply #12

JADELottery — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 04:36:22 GMT

also, you don't have to get $5.00 worth... just get $1.00 worth and try. no need to break the bank on this.

Reply #11

JADELottery — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 04:29:32 GMT

There are two ways of picking numbers, trying to determine what they Are and trying to determine what they Are Not. This is a simple and Fun way of determining what they are not and the more numbers there are in my Quick Picks, I also win. So, win-win all around. Good luck with your way too.

Reply #10

Badger — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:45:01 GMT

Jade, you and I are chasing the same games since we're both in Wisconsin. So I tried your method with Supercash ( 6 of 39)...but instead of buying a $5 QP, I just had the LP RNG generate ten lines. (I figure we go to the store and ask for a QP and the terminal generates ten lines using an RNG anyway)

Since we're dealing with fewer numbers, it figures that the QP would cover more numbers, which it did. It eliminated 9 of the 39 (the ten lines contained 30 different numbers) and only one of... [ More ]

Reply #9

Guru101 — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:16:19 GMT

Using a system to select lottery numbers both increases AND decreases your odds. Your goal of using a system is to design it in a way that it increases your odds more than it decreases it. For example, one of the functions in my PowerBall program discards any sets that have 3 consecutive numbers. This will increase my odds, BUT it will also slightly decrease my odds because sets that have 3 consecutive numbers ARE possible. The last time this happened on the PowerBall was on December 2, 2006. Ev... [ More ]

Reply #8

JADELottery — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:29:41 GMT

Just so happens, I have another set of Quick Picks for the same date, 2007-01-31. Let's see how these numbers fair.

A142123334048QP

B51314223637QP

C1319222836QP

D21126414647QP

E81220263547QP

F91011193649QP

G1512132340QP

H31528404244QP

I41317304647QP

J81014174547QP

Huh, lines B, C, D, F, I and J have 0 numbers from the drawing. Lines A, E, G, and H only have 1 number from the drawing. If I randomly select 2 of the lines from the list of combos, I'd have a 1 in... [ More ]

Reply #7

Pilot — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 05:18:23 GMT

hey guru,

can you elaborate on your method that didn't work? I think it's an interesting idea.

Pilot

Reply #6

Guru101 — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 04:59:26 GMT

I suggest NOT using quick picks as part of a system. I've tried it.

Reply #5

Badger — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 03:03:37 GMT

You know, that's an interesting way of looking at it. Food for thought.........Thanks

Reply #4

psykomo — Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:45:26 GMT

Thank$$$$$$$$$>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

for sharingggggggggggggssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss

YOUR IDEA$$$$$$$$$$$$ on QP'sssssssssssssssssssssssssss

HOPE U-Trick the QP's SOON

Reply #3

JAG331 — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:37:29 GMT

How would you know which lines to eliminate

Reply #2

JADELottery — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:06:45 GMT

Correction, there are 17 numbers in the Lines G, H and I. Missed the extra 30. Still 6 of 32 is (1 in 906,192), far less than (1 in 13,983,816).

Table of Numbers to Eliminate from the analysis numbers for the previous example

Numbers in lines G, H and I

2

3

6

8

14

15

25

27

29

30

33

34

36

37

42

46

48

Reply #1

lottolaughs — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:54:50 GMT

JADE,so are you saying that you would eliminate the lines that had none of your drawing numbers in them? Could you elaborate a little more? Thanks! Great post! I've often bought QP's,tooled around with them and bought some more tickets because as you show,there are always a few of them in there (usually) and sometimes they are very close.

The Anti-Quick Pick System

JADELottery — Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:08:55 GMT

The Anti-Quick Pick System

I've been studying Quick Picks and have come up with something using Quick Picks and your current analysis methods of selection. Depending on your lottery, you can use Quick Pick Numbers to eliminate numbers from your analysis numbers. Below is a sample Quick Pick I bought for this last 01-31 drawing of WI Megabucks (6/49). Notice lines G, H, and I of the Quick Picks have no numbers for that days drawing. The numbers drawn were 12, 21, 32, 38 ,39 and 44. Also, notic... [ More ]