The cornering method

Reply #27

pacattack05 — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:40:34 GMT

I like the way you think......

I think I would start tomorrow, using your system.

235 looks good...

Reply #26

pacattack05 — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:40:34 GMT

I like the way you think......

I think I would start tomorow, using your system.

235 looks good...

Reply #25

mysticwomyn — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:27:27 GMT

This is something that has to be followed everyday ...of course you are going to pick several combos from this...when I seen your system I just applied it to your most recent list of drawn numbers to see how it worked....it's something you might want to use in addition to yours .

How would you do yours for tomorrow?

Here's mine

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

468

5

6

7.........I would start with the "tips and the ends" I call them...8-7=1 ...there's one number...

since 722 had "22" in it I w... [ More ]

Reply #24

pacattack05 — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:16:15 GMT

You subtract 5-1.

Is that a permanent template, or does that change daily?

In other words, do I always take the first and last number, and put them together in a minus fashion?

You gave the example of 581. You took the 5 and the 1, and subtracted one from the other, equaling 4.

You say Go to the next number down which is 6 .

How do you derive at this?

Why 6?

So many questions....so little time....LOL

Reply #23

pacattack05 — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:09:27 GMT

You don't have to appologize....Im tired and need to go get some ZZZZZZZZ S.

No biggie.....

Reply #22

mysticwomyn — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:07:15 GMT

here's where 468 came from

last two draws were 581 & 518...rundown the 5 and insert the 581

581

6

7

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5...the 5 at the bottom goes up to the 1 in 581 and subtract...5-1=4...there's your 4...then you have your 8 next in 581...there's your 8...you used the 5 at the bottom so you are not going to use the 5 in 581...

go to the next number down which is 6...and there's your 4-6-8.

Reply #21

mysticwomyn — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 03:01:22 GMT

sorry ..I had some misspellings in there and too many "nows"..I corrected it.

Reply #20

pacattack05 — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:56:32 GMT

Nope.....

now now my system mixes or sometimes it's right there. Look at the 9 4...subtract..you get 5.

This is where I lost you.

now thw 4 from 8...you get 4...now go down to the next number which is 9...there's your next number....594 ( in box form...all these will be box form )

I'm so lost, but I'm sure it's me. I'm tired and have to work tomorrow. I'll probably understand it tomorrow, when I've had my rest......LOL

Reply #19

mysticwomyn — Wed, 21 Feb 2007 02:42:21 GMT

Hi pacattack05,

Let me show you my version of this concept. I do it a little different though.

Let's start with 814 and 849...I always work with the last two drawn numbers.

The oldest was 814....begins with 8...so I run down the 8

8

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8...then insert the next number where it goes which was 849

849

9

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9..... now my system mixes or sometimes it's right there. Look at the 9 & 4...subtract..you get 5.

now the 4 from 8...you ge... [ More ]

Reply #18

cps10 — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:51:11 GMT

Interesting stuff Pac...thanx

Reply #17

pacattack05 — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:40:08 GMT

The winning number was 198.

0

1

2

3

4

956

67

78

89

90

1

You see what I'm saying?......LOL

Reply #16

pacattack05 — Sat, 17 Feb 2007 01:02:41 GMT

You'd be surprised my friend.

I've learned a long time ago that unimaginable things happen, when the lottery officials do pretests and rotation ofthe tubes.

Reply #15

bud1 — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:57:59 GMT

thanks pacattack will try concept in mich.bud1

Reply #14

stavros — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:41:12 GMT

The 9 has hit the past four nights in FL. Using your system, you end up with 901, both at the bottom, and vertically at the bottom. I'm thinking it might not hit tonight since the 9 has hit so much already. What do you think? I have several other numbers in my workouts and don't have any 9's coming up.

Reply #13

pacattack05 — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 04:08:34 GMT

God I wish I played 956....

It figures....

Reply #12

pacattack05 — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:56:40 GMT

Well thank you very much.....LOL

I'll try to do even better...

Reply #11

Ms. Pat — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:43:32 GMT

Old Turkey

Where on earth have you been?

Ms. Pat

Reply #10

OldTurkey — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 03:37:28 GMT

Great call for Fla. 956

Reply #9

pacattack05 — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 02:11:41 GMT

Unfortunately I don't do windows or doubles......LOL

Reply #8

txpolo — Fri, 16 Feb 2007 01:32:06 GMT

Need help.

Pac could you do a workout on doubles?

118 and 282.

thanks

Reply #7

pacattack05 — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:37:50 GMT

This is starting to look better and better. I'm jumping on it right away. Good hearing the tweaks....LOL

Reply #6

lottolaughs — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:24:51 GMT

Glad you got it! And what's great is that even if you add the 5 6 or 7, it's still not all that many numbers to play. I'd try running the whole gamut, +1 +2 +3 etc. That's still only, what ,10 or 20 numbers if you don't go all out.

Not bad at all. Great work,pac!

Let me know how you're doing with it

Reply #5

pacattack05 — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:19:32 GMT

I see it now. You're just add 4 and then 5 and so on to make a new vertical list. Got it....

I'll have to try this...HMMMMM

Reply #4

pacattack05 — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:16:09 GMT

It's funny you mention CA, because I just looked at CA and it didn't do too well.

It looks good with your adding, but I can't see how you're adding the numbers. You said add the 456 and 7?

Please breakdown for me. Thanx.

Reply #3

lottolaughs — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:11:57 GMT

Great to see you back at work,pac!

I tried this out for CA. but I added a little twist (hope you don't mind!!) Tried for CA. 2/9

0

1

2

3

4

5

364

75

86

97

8

There was no hit here but when I started +'ing the 4 with 5,6 and 7 instead,then we had a hit..

364

79 (+5)

80

91

2

No HIT

--------------------------

364

70 (+6)

81

92

3

No... [ More ]

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:57:40 GMT

Thanx, and good to see you too...It's been a while huh

Reply #1

sfilippo — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:56:41 GMT

Glad you're posting again, Pac.

The cornering method

pacattack05 — Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:41:16 GMT

This dosen't happen too often, but when it does it's cool.

As an example I will use Florida's winning number from Feb. 12th. The winning number was 849.

You first make a vertical list from 0-9.

Then you situate the 849 between the relative numbers:

0

1

2

3

849

5

6

7

8

9

Then you continue to add up from the 9, all the way down until a corner is achieved:

0

1

2

3

849

50

61

72

83

94... [ More ]