*Jackpot Winner!!**

Reply #27

RJOh — Fri, 16 May 2008 20:36:33 GMT

I'm sure that's true in some cases, but if the software does what a serious player might normally do and does it faster then I'm sure some players think it's well worth the money. I've seen posts of players looking for software that will track and analyze drawing results but the problem is everyone has different ideas about what is needed to pick winners.

Most players want to know more than the standard combination sums, ranges, gaps, total hits and matches of past drawings that most softwar... [ More ]

Reply #26

time*treat — Fri, 16 May 2008 06:33:54 GMT

People must figure as long as you're wasting money on lottery tickets, you may as well waste some on their dreck software, too.

Reply #25

lottobrain — Fri, 16 May 2008 01:19:40 GMT

Actually, I don't believe that Expert Lotto has stated that anyone has won a jackpot using their program. It is an interesting concept. I tried experimenting with it myself for a few months after I started to understand how to use it, but could not win anything. One can see how it could hone in on the winning numbers and you can prove it to yourself by going through the procedure. One has to determine how much movement either up or down each of 11 different charts will go for the next drawing. T... [ More ]

Reply #24

RJOh — Wed, 14 May 2008 15:57:12 GMT

The other day the state of Minnesota proudly announced their 20th Powerball jackpot winner since the game began in 1992 and yet some of the lottery software advertisers would have you believe their costumers win more jackpots than that in a single year. There's just not as many jackpot winners as they have people claiming to have won a jackpot using their software.

Reply #23

Badger — Wed, 14 May 2008 10:25:25 GMT

Yeah, you know, about the most useless thing on the various sites are the testimonials. I don't even read them any more. It's simply too easy for the site owners to make somethng up, so its a waste of time.

Reply #22

jarasan — Wed, 14 May 2008 03:03:46 GMT

We won't get fooled again!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rp6-wG5LLqE feature=related

RJ you did this thread like Pete Townsend plays on this little ditty.

Thanks.

P.S. Todd you are the Rodger Daltrey. Rock on.

Reply #21

reddog — Tue, 13 May 2008 23:16:00 GMT

You have been trying this software out since June of 2006 and you still don't have any winning tickets to share with us? That saids alot about the program.

Reply #20

RJOh — Tue, 13 May 2008 13:57:21 GMT

Haven't you read the advertisements of most of the commercial software, they all have testimonial of people who have won big using their software, it's part of their sale pitch.

Reply #19

lank — Tue, 13 May 2008 05:25:47 GMT

There is no sure way of hitting the numbe. U got to let the number hit U.

Reply #18

guesser — Tue, 13 May 2008 05:15:44 GMT

Well, one thing to keep in mind is if there WAS a commercial software product that actually DID pick the winning numbers in the past 10 years, we would have heard about it/whoever developed and marketed it would be ALL OVER the news.

Yeah, I've heard of software picking a winner - 15-20 years ago, when it was a lot easier, the Matrix was a lot smaller, but I have not heard of any in the last 10-12 years.

Reply #17

Todd — Tue, 13 May 2008 04:37:13 GMT

Scam Alert

Isn't it so transparent what these people will go through -- and lie about -- in order to make money ripping people off?

Tom9041 and ma507 are the same person. I'll now do some deeper digging in the system to see what other accounts he has registered.

To all: Please click the Report Abuse link on any post mentioning this Expert Lotto software. This person has been posting spam to the forums on and off for a couple years now, and I've really had it with his garbage.

I'm tir... [ More ]

Reply #16

RJOh — Tue, 13 May 2008 04:15:02 GMT

In the past I've posted details about routines I've put in my lottery programs and will continue to do so as I come up with new ideas in the future, they're all there in the archives. I don't like reposting the same things over and over.

I have yet to come up with a strategy/system that wins more than the minimum prize consistently on my budget. I once matched 5of6 in Ohio Super Lotto years ago and never done any better since even with the improvements I've added. When I compare my results wi... [ More ]

Reply #15

Tom9041 — Tue, 13 May 2008 01:33:44 GMT

Good news RJOh. Please give the full details of your system/programs that are in progress, so we can all help to develop it into the best program around: - after all that is what Lottery Post is all about.

Reply #14

RJOh — Tue, 13 May 2008 00:17:50 GMT

I have a system/programs that's a work in progress as I'm constantly adding features which I think make it better. I've made a few predictions on the prediction board once in a while just to test it.

When PadawanLotto was active at LP, I predicted for some of the same games that he predicted just to compare my results with his Lotto Expert picks and could never tell if Lotto Expert gave him an edge.

Reply #13

Tom9041 — Mon, 12 May 2008 23:56:58 GMT

I can absolutely assure everyone that I am in no way connected to Expert lotto in any way at all. Just trying to be helpful point out that it's another program that people might like to try, if nothing else use the ideas systems it has, to improve on their own favoiurite program or system, hopefully that could lead to someone who really needs it, to winning a jackpot. If anyone has a better program I would certainly like to hear about it, as I don't necassarilly see Expert Lotto as the B all end... [ More ]

Reply #12

RJOh — Mon, 12 May 2008 23:49:10 GMT

Probably is him, he went all out trying to prove he could win big using that software. He was a real believer in its potential but he finally gave up and stopped posting at LP.

Reply #11

RJOh — Mon, 12 May 2008 23:32:36 GMT

ma507,

Like Tom9041, you too made a similar post about Lotto Expert almost 2 years ago at: https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/130506

You've had plenty of time to evaluate it. I'm beginning to think you and Tom are just posing as lottery players to post commercials for Lotto Expert. It's hard to believe anything either of you guys post.

Reply #10

ma507 — Mon, 12 May 2008 23:03:11 GMT

Hi Tom Very interesting I too have been trying out Expert lotto, (trial version is free). I have tried Lotto Pro, Lotto Buster, Gail Howard, Robert Serotic, Lotto logix, Lotto mania, Lotto Hat, Ken Silver systems all with virtually no luck. I have been trialing Expert Lotto's winning number history system, which appears to be unique to expert Lotto so far the results are very encouraging. I haven't put any money on using it yet as I am still getting familiar with it as time allows. Their program... [ More ]

Reply #9

MillionsWanted — Mon, 12 May 2008 19:20:43 GMT

Come back with a scan of a winning ticket and I will believe you.

Reply #8

psykomo — Mon, 12 May 2008 17:06:07 GMT

Congrat'sssssssssssss Tom9:

U must know How to MARKET a product in the G@@D ole USA!!!!!!!!!!

BUT,.............. remember the BUTT that wait's in the shaddow'$$$$$

TOO get U ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

U were smart NOT to use the word's...... NEW ....... improved

in UR above advertisement...................because, if U use any of those

words............by US law Todd has the RIGHT's to let it

run as advertised for 6 month's BUTT

After the 6 month's Todd has the RIGHT... [ More ]

Reply #7

Todd — Mon, 12 May 2008 16:05:56 GMT

What a loaded and wrong statement. If this can't win the jackpot NOTHING can?!

As far as I know, it has not made any jackpot winners, but other software has.

Please don't post commercials on Lottery Post, people can easily detect the difference between marketing statements and real-life experiences.

Nice job with the research on this RJOh.

Reply #6

RJOh — Mon, 12 May 2008 15:57:47 GMT

Gail Howard's systems, Lotto pro, expert lotto and don't forget Lotto Buster and others claim to have updated or been improved lately but their changes are usually the ones necessary to play the newer matrices of the older games or those of the newer games.

Reply #5

Badger — Mon, 12 May 2008 11:40:08 GMT

Just in the way of info -- I tried it (they had a trial version) and used it on backtesting. Disappointing. Not any better than anything else out there. If they still have a trial version, go ahead and play aroound with that. But don't spend your money untill you see some real results.

Reply #4

Tom9041 — Mon, 12 May 2008 11:19:11 GMT

Due to lots of work family commitments I don't have the time that I would like to spend on testing lotto systems, don't necessarily even take lotto tickets each week. I just enjoy studying up lotto statistics, as a hobby type of thing. I have been using Gail Howard's systems, Lotto pro, expert lotto. In the last year or so I have found that Expert Lotto has the best results of them all , ( great filters available, which I am still finding out about), so have decided now that the new version is o... [ More ]

Reply #3

RJOh — Mon, 12 May 2008 08:28:41 GMT

Tom9041,

I was reading some of your posts in August 2007 at: https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/161671

You said pretty much the same thing. How much have you won since then using this software

Reply #2

Tom9041 — Mon, 12 May 2008 08:09:09 GMT

Thanks RJOH Perhaps they are too busy collecting their winnings from Expert Lotto?? LOL I wonder if they have tested the latest version tho??/ (Much improved

Reply #1

RJOh — Mon, 12 May 2008 08:04:57 GMT

Several members have tested that software. Rip Snorter and PadawanLotto who haven't posted in a while used that software exclusively for a while without much luck. You can do a search for Expert Lotto and find their comments and results.

*Jackpot Winner!!**

Tom9041 — Mon, 12 May 2008 07:04:47 GMT

Was Lust looking at the greatly improved Expert Lotto program. This has everything you could want in a lotto program, including a rather classy predictor for predicting future winning numbers, and new help file / manual. If this can't win the jackpot NOTHING can.