<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Steve Player&#x27;s &#x22;Lucky 7-plus&#x22; system?  How can it cover doubles too?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/175674" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Steve Player&#x27;s &#x22;Lucky 7-plus&#x22; system?  How can it cover doubles too?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674/1039499</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674/1039499</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 06:11:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pacattack05</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#x27;s basically a bait and switch. The switch being some event that works sometimes, yet enough to warrant it as proof of the reliability of the system.<br /><br />I&#x27;ve had many years of experience in buying some of his work, and the sales spiel that came with it.<br /><br />The only good one he has is the cash graphs. Period. The rest is just passifying the masses.<br /><br />There is no such system. To cover doubles costs more. End of discussion. Unless someone changes the laws of physics and numbers, it&#x27;ll be what it... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674/1039499">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>pacattack05</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674/1039483</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674/1039483</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 05:05:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ThatScaryChick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I don&#x27;t have or know what the Lucky 7 system is, but my guess is that you would have to play those numbers online for 25/50 cents or something.</p>]]></description>
			<category>ThatScaryChick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steve Player&#x27;s &#x22;Lucky 7-plus&#x22; system?  How can it cover doubles too?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/175674</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 04:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Joy2</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I got the regular &#x27;Lucky 7 system, and it doesn&#x27;t cover the chosen digit if a doubles combo is drawn. The Lucky 7-plus system claims that even if a double digit combination is drawn, that you are still covered and you still win whether or not a nomatch combo is drawn or a doubles combo (as long as it contains your key digit). How is this possible ? wouldn&#x27;t it cost more than 37 dollars a day (or 18 dollars a day) like the regular Lucky 7 system</p>]]></description>
			<category>Joy2</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

