Do you design your system or create your method from the lottery matrix?

Reply #3

four4me — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 03:31:38 GMT

Mega-ThinkTank if it works stick with it.

There aren't any mega or powerball winners that i can recall that said they won using a system other than the birthday and birth date crowd.

Reply #2

Guru101 — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:36:27 GMT

My system is designed for picking numbers that are drawn primarily(but not solely) from the same pool of numbers. For example, Pick 5, Pick 6, and PB. However, since PB only has 5 numbers chosen from the same pool, I decided to switch over to Pick 6, where my system can have its full effect. Plus, the initial odds of winning Hoosier Lotto is 12 times smaller than it is to win PB, so that helps a lot too. When I want to use my system for a new game, I have to put all the stuff on paper first, the... [ More ]

Reply #1

tntea — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:34:29 GMT

Please join Maddog's challenge.

Gives you another way to check your method.

Do you design your system or create your method from the lottery matrix?

Mega-ThinkTank — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:57:59 GMT

I find no sense in designing a system to win the lottery -- it doesn't work. QP would be just as good as any system designed.

A method created from the lottery matrix, I find it much more sensible. A method should allow you to see and understand why EACH numbers played the way it did. I'm able to see and understand why the next numbers will be played, too. The problem about seeing the next numbers to be played, it leaves you with a choice: there will be a few numbers to pick from for each num... [ More ]