A risky proposition worth taking...

Reply #84

RJOh — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:57:01 GMT

Sorry, I didn't know you were still around. My post was just a general comment about this thread and others like it, it wasn't meant to be feedback for you.

I hope you do win a significant prize and prove everything you've been saying is true. Good luck to you.

Reply #83

Mega-ThinkTank — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:01:59 GMT

To make efforts to blend with the community (especially the more established members), I took advices from one of the 4 members that constantly attacked me for not sharing anything. After I shared, they still attacked me. I lose both ways. Even now, YOU'RE attacking me again after I have satisfed the request of sharing a method.

I was actually hoping someone would come forward and tell me how much they like the method. I've been watching the numbers and applying the method and saw tremen... [ More ]

Reply #82

RJOh — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:43:49 GMT

Original Post by Mega-ThinkTank

What would make us reveal our method/system? It seems to me, L.P. is like a place where you come to barter a trade...like they used to do in the old days before money. You got something of value that I need and I have something of value that you need and we trade. Simple as that.

Now, I know there are some L.P. minds sitting around here and waiting for a member to slip up and spill some quality knowledge about the game. I even tried to break this vicious cy... [ More ]

Reply #81

dld1961 — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 20:36:04 GMT

Well you are quite the insecure person. Did not attack you was agreeing to disagree on a certain topic. As far as God well i dont try to put words in his mouth or assume this is what he or she thinks. You will notice i said nothing about bodily harm as you did a few posts ago. You will also notice less and less posters will converse with you about anything because all they have to do is read your past posts. As far as fishing for mm and pb #s there was a post awhile back that was very informativ... [ More ]

Reply #80

Mega-ThinkTank — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:59:20 GMT

Let's examine what you just said. First, you ask a question about fishing for Mega Millions and Powerball and then abruptly attacked me about threaten with bodily harm. You got issues, dude.

I have no problem with Todd. The problem is you. What's worse, you make condensending remarks and finish it off with a God bless and good luck. If you knew anything about God, He doesn't like His name being used in vain.

And remember, I was attacked first. Even after I shared a method with the communit... [ More ]

Reply #79

dld1961 — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:23:12 GMT

Does anyone recall a post that asked which pool you would be fishing in for mega millions and powerball. Not very far off the mark, very informative who was that poster. Megathinktank if you threaten with bodily harm Todd may say so long to you!!!!!!! Agree to disagree, are you 2 years old or what. You have ideas and methods like all of us, no better or less than anyone else. And remember vice versa the same respect should be given and taken, if someone disagrees or can't see what you see in you... [ More ]

Reply #78

RJOh — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:18:32 GMT

While it's desirable to have hard to believe claims validated, it's not likely to happen. Some of the claims in this thread have the same problem and as has happen in the past they will be forgotten.

Reply #77

Mega-ThinkTank — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:33:19 GMT

Yeah, I read that post... I'll just follow your lead and wait for Ebearam to post the Validation Ticket or all one has to do is check the New York Mega Million site, ask Ebearam to post the ticket number. Then call the NY Mega Million and see if that Ticket number matched a 4/1 hit for that date.

Only 8 Yorkers hit a 4/1 that day. If he's among the lucky few, I'm thrill for him and hope he can post the Validation Ticket or the Ticket Number and I'll call it in myself to verify.... [ More ]

Reply #76

BobP — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:28:28 GMT

Couple of thoughs.

The Pick-5/56 portion of Mega Millions is 1 in 3,819,816.

Selecting Odd or Even Sums or Roots cuts the amount of combinations in half to 1,909,908.

Working with 28 numbers instead of 56 when correct reduces the amount of combinations to 98,280.

When selecting 28 numbers out of 56 by any means, probability suggests we will have all 5 of the winning numbers one time in 36.87 tries. And 4 of the winning numbers one time in 6.66 tries. Any method that impro... [ More ]

Reply #75

ThatScaryChick — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:26:27 GMT

Keep in mind, those guys are playing 12 numbers. It doesn't meanthey're getting those winning numbers on one line. When Ebearam hitthat 4+1 the other day, I was thrill for him. I thought he would comeout and tell us he won the $10,000 dollars. He didn't. I doubt he gotit all on one line. I'd assume he's doing something right because he'srecording some good hits lately.

Actually in this post he admits that he hit the 4+1.

Reply #74

four4me — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:39:48 GMT

I'll save you some work GEOS5556 picks his numbers off of the serial numbers on dollar bills. He has won a couple different jackpots on the prediction board doing it his way.

Reply #73

Mega-ThinkTank — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 02:35:46 GMT

Keep in mind, those guys are playing 12 numbers. It doesn't mean they're getting those winning numbers on one line. When Ebearam hit that 4+1 the other day, I was thrill for him. I thought he would come out and tell us he won the $10,000 dollars. He didn't. I doubt he got it all on one line. I'd assume he's doing something right because he's recording some good hits lately.

I don't know much about TNT or GEOS5556, I'll check 'em out. As far as challenging them, I'm chilling and waiting til I... [ More ]

Reply #72

fja — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:42:20 GMT

Just so you guys don't get off to a wrong number...The last didgit in yesterday's Mega million draw was 32 not 36 as was posted above....Good Luck with your selections

Reply #71

JonnyBgood07 — Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:36:36 GMT

Wow!...couldn't help to read this whole thread since I had the time.As I am not a wholehearted big jp player,I can offer a simple approach for megathink .Don't know why but it dawned on me how tank or others could pull it off.(others meaning those of you who are convinced you can get at least 3 with your method/system whether it's statistical or whatever alot of the time)

I've been a member a short time and I recently like to dabble in Maddogs mega and pball challenges.It's become pretty appa... [ More ]

Reply #70

Stack47 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:39:31 GMT

If we were to meet in person, I'd probably pop you in the mouth because you incense me with your cavalier attitude assuming stuff I said that I never said.

LMAO!

Like when Mike Tyson bit off Holyfield's ear?

This is message board that discusses lottery related topics not the UFC, WWE or gang banging.

Reply #69

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:08:43 GMT

Okay.... the thing with you is that you need to see the math in order to be convinced that it works. I don't deal with any math equations in my methods. I don't even believe math have anything to do with selecting numbers. Believe it or not, math just paints a picture with a statement: Facts are stubborn things.

You centering around this belief: Math Formula/Equation + Percentage = An accurate and realistic way to play. That's false, Stack.

The Mega Million lottery DOES NOT recognize ANY m... [ More ]

Reply #68

Stack47 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:05:43 GMT

Also, I'm not cutting in to rag on you or anything

My intentions isn't to rag on anybody either, but I did the math and don't see a large enough reduction in Tank's method to make it worthwhile. If tank can show me where I made a mistake in the math, great but I doubt that is going to happen.

That being said, reducing the 56 numbers into 10 groups using final digits is an excellent tool. If somebody could find a way to eliminate 5 of the groups, the 56 numbers could be cut in half or as l... [ More ]

Reply #67

Stack47 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:11:14 GMT

Again, you doing it WRONG. You not following my method.

I'm sure you did the math before doing it the right way. Exactly how many combinations have that similarity?

What is the reduction?

Show the math where the odds are greatly improved by using your method?

What would be the first consecutive number from the 0,1,2,4,8 ? O and 1, right. So, that would be the only consecutive numbers to used against last night draw. So, you take the 0 and 1 and MAKE SURE IT DOES NOT PLAY TOGETHER O... [ More ]

Reply #66

Amazing Grace — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:14:45 GMT

Nice Handle. welcome aboard LP

Breathe Deeply.

Your thoughts are interesting.

Reply #65

Amazing Grace — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:12:04 GMT

A system is a pattern you have or think you have noticed. And thats when you apply a system to that type of pattern, so when it happens again you captalize.

Thats why there are many systems.

Last years number in WC yesterday was 012 yesterdays was 011

Then it switches to all high. That is one such system or method of thinking.

today you may get sum 11 and tomorrow sum 12 another method of thinking, or system.

Today is the 23 of July does 723 drop all state? Another system.

Reply #64

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:43:24 GMT

Neat trick....even though it involves guessing. I think your trick and my trick, coupled together would make a nice little tool to help combat the field of numbers to play.

I'll be checking if Mega Million allow the numbers to travel like that. Again, neat trick dude...... the community should take notice.

Reply #63

x1kosmic — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:26:37 GMT

I think if I'm seeing that right the numbers 01 and 10 would've been eliminated, and it, did work if that's right. Anyway.... nice trick, TT.

Also, I'm not cutting in to rag on you or anything, but rather show you one of my little tricks, I use sometimes in Powerball.

6 28 46 53 55 6 8 6 3 5 will 6 travel tonight? or a number next to it? a million mabeys

3 15 23 29 42 3 5 3 9 2 3 goes

2 12 20 22 50 2 2 0 2 0 over-riding 2 goes

5 7 31 49 50 5 7 1 9 3 no over-ride not... [ More ]

Reply #62

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:07:54 GMT

Stack, Stack, Stack.....

Slow down and listen to me dude. Stop being so against me and maybe you'd be open to what I'm trying to show you. Again, you doing it WRONG. You not following my method. You thinking in YOUR terms, not my terms. Think in MY terms....read it and comprehend it the way I'm telling you.

As a matter of fact, I just checked the numbers for the Mega Million draw and my method worked to a PERFECTO!!

Here's last night draw: 02 16 23 29 36 MB 46

What you do i... [ More ]

Reply #61

Stack47 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:35:40 GMT

But Tank used the numbers 5 and 27 in the combination used as example of one to play (For Ex. : I may play 05 12 27 31 40 MM 11) and the five ending number groups were 0-1-2-4-8. I did find 2 times in the last 20 drawings when none of the ending numbers matched the next drawing but that isn't even close to 60% of the time . I'm pretty sure Tank's method includes all 56 numbers.

I'm not going to check over 300 MM drawings to find the actual percentage of drawings none of the ending digits repe... [ More ]

Reply #60

Stack47 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 06:23:23 GMT

In the last 7 draws, 5 of those draws (before the last two) worked like a charm. Check for yourself if you don't believe me. It's works 60 percent of the times, not 11.41% in 60% of the drawings...

I'm not questioning if it works 60% of the time, Most filtering programs reduce a large set of numbers into playable combinations and most filters are based on probabilities or similarities to past drawings. If 75% of all possible combinations are in specific sum range, then about 75% of all the d... [ More ]

Reply #59

DC81 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:55:04 GMT

What do you expect when you come here bragging that you're going to be the next to hit a MM jackpot with your system ? Then nothing, absolutely nothing comes from with it after the hype and then start with this sort of thing.

Stop whining and take it like a man, not some twerp on the playground who embarrassed themself.

Reply #58

JKING — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:16:31 GMT

Hi,

Given the available methods out there, I'm not sure Mega's is a best choice senario. Using Stack47 info of a 11.14% combination reduction with a 40% error as a measure to compare, I have hesitant to use it in any shape or form. If you look at the table below you'll notice by simply eliminating 2 of the same numbers out of all your combination you get a 17% combination reduction with a 3.6% error. Even if you want to give Mega's system some slack, because it's historically based and elimi... [ More ]

Reply #57

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:35:52 GMT

Oh I get it, first, the criticism by you and a few others was that I'm out to rob people's ideas etc. Then it was a attack against my credibility that I contribute nothing. Then it was a mock that there's no thinktank system. The onslaughts kept going and going by a FEW MEMBERS.

I put a method out, not only does it works, a highly-regarded member gave it the thumbs up. Other members asked for my advice. Other members agree with me on other issues but the few members are still hellbent on me.... [ More ]

Reply #56

BobP — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:20:15 GMT

Sometimes you don't only need more tools in your toolbox, you need a whole workshop.

There's a different path to the Jackpot for every draw. There's nothing wrong with taking a look at the numbers on a skip and hit chart to try and determine the numbers most likely to fall. If you find yourself talking to the numbers (or yourself for that matter) trying to come up with a valid reason to play any nunber, it shouldn't be a surprise.

Studying the movement of the numbers may involve a hu... [ More ]

Reply #55

BobP — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:08:41 GMT

The filter is not to play any of the final digits that appeared in the prior draw and not to play any consecutives of those that remain.

The applicable Free Wheeling filter would be not loading those unwanted numbers by K - Keypad instead of using P - Pointer.

At least that's what I think, who knows I could be right.

BobP

Reply #54

dld1961 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:44:10 GMT

Mega ThinkTank you would do well to keep your names to yourself, or maybe you cant just agree to disagree, or you will just fade away as alot of others have done in the past. Names are for schoolchildren not adults. Alot of what you say is and has been said by alot of posters who are not here anymore. Please instruct and show the folks at LP what you are asking the other posters to do. Words have as much power as one gives them. Do you know anyone called tomcat. God bless and good luck.

Reply #53

Stack47 — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:35:32 GMT

Keep coming at me with that crap. If Todd doesn't step in and establish order, I'll put you in your place. Fast. Keep it up....

LMAO!

LP is a place where people discuss a large number of lottery related topics with very few restrictions. There has been people banned from this site for posting inappropriate material, but it was done by the owner. And since you're not the owner, this idea that you can put people in their place is not only untrue but very silly.

See folks, this is the pr... [ More ]

Reply #52

Mega-ThinkTank — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:26:19 GMT

Stack,

My method has nothing to do with combinations. It's a method to reduce the field of numbers you plan to play.

Look at it another way, just pick whatever lines you plan to play, then applied my method and check your last digits on your lines and make sure the consecutive numbers the method produces doesn't play on your lines.

In the last 7 draws, 5 of those draws (before the last two) worked like a charm. Check for yourself if you don't believe me. It's works 60 percent of the tim... [ More ]

Reply #51

time*treat — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:34:24 GMT

The budget constraints dictate there will always be some subjectivity as the decisions are made on which filters to use and in which order to use them.

E.g. you have a budget to play 20 combos. Your system produces 40 sets which include a-b-c-d-e+x and a-b-c-d-f+y. You need a consistent way to decide which combo is kept when that happens.

Reply #50

Stack47 — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:21:04 GMT

By using this filter alone, the total number of combinations would be reduced by 11.14% in 60% of the drawings and used with other filters it would certainly help. But the real problem with both MM and PB is filtering the large number of starting combination down to playable combos; even after a 99% reduction there are still over 39,000 combos.

This filter can be applied to the Free Wheeling program by using 3 steps. Use the zone filters to include 1 to 2 of the numbers ending in 0 and exclud... [ More ]

Reply #49

DownandDirty — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:55:49 GMT

I don't think that all systems either incorporate history or mysticism. While my blend system includes these elements as it pertains to number selection; I like to kick around other ideas that don't involve these considerations.

Such as making a number/line selection that covers as much ground as possible with as little expense. Finding ways (in disregard to past history) to produce some 2nd/3rd place winners. I like tax free fast money. I know that various wheeling methods can help with this... [ More ]

Reply #48

RJOh — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:34:09 GMT

It's the attitude by the establish members that been here much longer than most of us (you can tell by their Member Number) and they think that earns them the right to ridicule the newbies.

Having a low member number doesn't means one is an established member, it just means they have been around for while and probably have read other posts similar to yours.

Old ideas keep getting recirculated by new members who think they are new. Ever body who comes to LP talks about winning a lottery a... [ More ]

Reply #47

JKING — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:24:14 GMT

Hi,

I'm not sure the best way to this, but I'll give it a try.

If you've been around the LP for awhile, there have been several individuals and systems making fantastic claims about themselves and their systems. And in the end, when all the smoke and mirrors have run their course, there typically is very little substance to the claims. You indeed may have more experienced, have a better system, or any of the other positive attributes someone might want to look for. But, given what I just... [ More ]

Reply #46

Mega-ThinkTank — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:16:52 GMT

See folks, this is the problem I've been noticing since I started posting. It's like a battle between the establish members against the new members. It's the attitude by the establish members that been here much longer than most of us (you can tell by their Member Number) and they think that earns them the right to ridicule the newbies.

I would think it's okay to do a constructive criticism but to mock someone in a sense where they feel unwelcomed, is a dangerous precedent in a community. Any... [ More ]

Reply #45

Mega-ThinkTank — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:52:57 GMT

I suggest you continue to read the entire post and don't stop at a thread where you blew up and had to respond right away.

My number info is not a requisite of your approval. I recognize Robert Perkis and thrill he recognizes my work (or maybe you didn't read what he had to say about my number info ).

Maybe it's best you take your seat among the few members I singled out AFTER they rudely came after me, airhead.

Reply #44

dld1961 — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:40:43 GMT

Amazing, i have read this thread for a couple of days and it would seem that your question or questions are being answered megathinktank(sp). But the answers are not exactly as you want so therein you reject and berate the other posters. I dont require or want any of your data of lotteries or # info. Robert Perkis is very respected and knows more than alot about the # games. So sorry all of the posters are so inadequate and dont meet your expectations here on the LP. God bless and good luck.

Reply #43

RJOh — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:02:17 GMT

Were those lucky combinations for July 23, 2004 or today

Reply #42

RJOh — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:47:06 GMT

That sounds like playing a hunch, which is fine but it's more like buying a QP when you're feeling lucky than using a thought out system for picking your numbers.

Reply #41

BobP — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:35:40 GMT

Unless the theory is hard wired into probability and step by step to a result, it's going to be largely subjective. You know, a gut feel, train the brain kinda thing.

Guess I'm not the only one that talks to the numbers.

BobP

Reply #40

time*treat — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:26:17 GMT

This thread feels like there are two different conversations going on. I've shared ideas with many of the folks who have posted on this topic, and it has never occurred to me that someone was holding back or not sharing enough . Maybe that has to do with my view that our systems should be at least a little different.

The approach I use is along the lines of Has anyone tried [idea], and what were your results?

It appears far more effective than Post your stuff and I'll tell you if it's an... [ More ]

Reply #39

JKING — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:23:39 GMT

Hi,

Well then, how about a few snippets of what you do. Nothing or not enough to endanger the overall security and secrecy of your method. Until such time, I'll keep doing what I do. *S

Reply #38

Mega-ThinkTank — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 23:26:15 GMT

JKing,

I really wish I could sit down and show you how to play the game; what to look at, what to look for and what to avoid so you can be a complete player. Even with all the knowledge I posesses, I come to realize it takes enormous preparation to get 6 numbers ready before a draw. I have a life beside the lottery, and the time I do spend getting my numbers ready, I'm like a column or two too late and end up rushing it and not doing the other stuff to ensure I played the best numbers possibl... [ More ]

Reply #37

Stack47 — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:16:39 GMT

Thanks, I'll check my tickets

Reply #36

BobP — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:46:44 GMT

Now that would make a sweet filter if any lottery filtering software authors are reading this.

BobP

Reply #35

JKING — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:48:25 GMT

Hi,

Maybe it's just me. But, every time I've tried a pattern recognition or a pattern match/mismatch approach, like the one suggested in you post, I keep running into the same barrier/problem. Not enough combinations eliminated for the amount of error incurred (std is 38000+ for 1% error) or just not enough combinations eliminated. Have you found a way around this

Reply #34

G26GRACE27 — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:40:54 GMT

Greetings! here are the results from 2004 for mega millions for Wednesday, July 23, 2004!

05-12-25-35-37 12,

Lucky combinations:

7 9 31 42 43 47

10 13 20 31 51 1

9,17,18,22,38,39 42

3 10 21 25 29 49

Reply #33

Mega-ThinkTank — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:46:15 GMT

What a surprise to get a response from BobP (aka Robert Perkis, if I'm not mistaken??) Interesting story... while your main character(s) sought more and more from the masses, I only sought ONE sound, workable method/system to pick the first numbers of a whole number.

In fact, I did ask....right here under the Jackpot Forum. Not a blip of an asnwer. I went on to devise a little method to get the answer I was seeking. Though it's a longer process than I would like, I did ask the community first... [ More ]

Reply #32

BobP — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 05:42:19 GMT

Sounds a lot like the story of Stone Soup to me.

A small group of hungry troops without food are passing through a town that's been pretty much picked clean.

One of the officers stops and has the men setup a cooking pot over a fire.

The townspeople begin to come out to see if the troops have any food only to learn the officer has a plan to make Stone Soup.

Soup from stones, why it isn't possible, is it?

Never the less the troops bring the water to a slow boil while... [ More ]

Reply #31

RJOh — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:10:01 GMT

Stack, I doubt if there ever was a thinktank system . When players tell Mega they use draw history to develop charts and statistics for their systems, he acts like such information is too obvious and simple to be taken serious. He says he doesn't believe in mysticism and dreams so where else could he go for ideas to develop a system

Reply #30

Mega-ThinkTank — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 03:28:26 GMT

Look guys, I'm not here to lead people on to falsehood or whatever doubts you have against me. I'm sensing you guys trying to torpedo me as if I'm blowing a bunch of smoke up people a**es. Far be it that represents my reputation.

I mean, I can take you boys under my wings and show you a whole different world than you thought you knew about numbers. I can introduce you to a creative way of looking at numbers and you would be amazed.

You will be amazed to see my handle on these patterns and... [ More ]

Reply #29

pick4hawk — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:41:28 GMT

some states lock out numbers that is why people don't share

fake vague new ideas are not nice either

Reply #28

RJOh — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:37:08 GMT

That is true. As I explained when I post that, there are 19 different distribution patterns in the winning MM combinations and 70% of the combinations are covered by the top seven or so. If you noticed all the MM combinations I post on the prediction board fit one of those patterns, so that is a part of my system. It may be silly to you, but that what I do. I've posted other parts of my system that others thought was nonsense, but they can do what I do and ignore posts they don't like.

Note... [ More ]

Reply #27

Stack47 — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:19:13 GMT

In which of your posts can we find the thinktank system ?

I just wish they share more than simple statistical charts

Is that like wishing somebody will do all the necessary work in creating a system, pick the winning numbers, fill out the play slips, and buy the tickets for you?

Hey, and if you cash the tickets, nobody can say you contributed nothing.

Reply #26

Mega-ThinkTank — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:33:13 GMT

No need to lecture me. I have noticed and had my share of causing a ruckus on that board. The 'Dreams Ladies' hates me in Mystical because I thwart that dream=money crap and they didn't like that.

I'm appreciative of the responses from jackpot seekers -- that's what a community is all about. I just wish they share more than simple statistical charts and information they gleam from other members like, BobP's Triangle System where A= 0-19, B= 20-29, and so on..... RJOH would know all about... [ More ]

Reply #25

Mega-ThinkTank — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:26:32 GMT

I bet that GM worker is your kin folks...... don't lie either.

Reply #24

four4me — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 23:08:34 GMT

The majority of people come here to post in the pick 3 board. With the mystical board coming in a close second.

If you had explored this site you would have noticed that.

Many jackpot seekers have responded to your posts. Many have shared their knowledge with you and us.

What have you contributed.

Reply #23

RJOh — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:52:54 GMT

I get it now, you're like that GM worker in that song by Johnny Cash who built a 1969, 70, 71, 72, 73 ........ Cadillac at home by taking one piece at a time.

Reply #22

Mega-ThinkTank — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 22:38:36 GMT

You know, it's astonishing how easily L.P. members misconstrue other people's statements to fit what they want them to say....as if to add fuel to the flames of a non-issue just for the hell of it. I'm not pointing fingers at any particular person. I'm speaking more in general how people have a lack of reading comprehension and assume something a person said. Interesting indeed.

I think I made myself clear the first time and all one have to do is re-read it and see what I'm really saying. The... [ More ]

Reply #21

Stack47 — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:09:54 GMT

The only logical reason I can think of for not sharing a system is because it actually works and the proof it worked would be correctly picking all 3, 4, 5 or 6 numbers, playing them and collecting the winnings. A working system has value, maybe in the millions so what could the average player have that would be worth trading for?

For the most part systems are unproven theories and if the system doesn't work, I see no risk in asking for ideas that might make it work. There is no risk in offer... [ More ]

Reply #20

RJOh — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 15:49:27 GMT

The best 'system' ANY of us have here will only bag 3 of the numbers - (and not as often as you think), that's been well-established.

If your pools of numbers are large enough all the winning numbers will be in them, the problem is the number of combinations that are possible.

I've found with a pool of 25-30 numbers for the MM game, I'll have 3 or more of the winning numbers 75% of the time and all five 15% of the time. I'm comfortable with my chances picking 20 of those combinations usin... [ More ]

Reply #19

guesser — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:13:23 GMT

The best 'system' ANY of us have here will only bag 3 of the numbers - (and not as often as you think), that's been well-established. You still need 3 other numbers.

And yes, I don't post much of what I do, because as I have said before: I tell folks what I'm doing, they laugh at me, and then I am proven correct.

I, like most others, don't need the grief of folks telling me I'm wrong when I'm right, so I just don't put myself in the position of having to defend myself, because it just isn... [ More ]

Reply #18

RJOh — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 02:52:54 GMT

For me, I'll share sniipits from my system(s) but never the whole system.

I see lottery systems as cumulations of routines that work together to accomplish one goal. A collection of snip bits from other systems is just going be a bunch of chaos with no direction.

As far as I know no LP member has ever shared a lottery jackpot because of information shared at LP. Even posting predictions never caused such a problem.

Most systems start out with all the possible numbers that can be played... [ More ]

Reply #17

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:48:26 GMT

Well Just......

Were you flattered that a guy 20 years younger was hot for you? LOL.

Reply #16

JKING — Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:06:10 GMT

One of the problems that inhibits sharing is the way jackpots are structured. Think about it, the one time you hit the big jackpot, you have to share it with multiple people because you posted your system at the LP.

For me, I'll share sniipits from my system(s) but never the whole system. Take the MM tables I recently posted, they are a good foundation for any system if utilized properly. On the other hand, they are far from giving away a full system.

The other problem is that the knowle... [ More ]

Reply #15

Coin Toss — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 23:19:09 GMT

Dare I say women always have the edge in such situations!

Justxploring, I can't believe you didn't post that you replied to him:

You mean you have the numbers coming up in the next drawing

Reply #14

justxploring — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 21:36:43 GMT

Yes, I get it. It's funny that you used that specific example because of a recent personal experience. A handsome 38 yr old moved next door to me a couple of months ago. One night he hit on me after drinking way too many beers. I can't repeat the rest. When I turned down his advances, he wouldn't give up. Eventually he said I don't see anyone banging down your door. I shrugged it off to being plastered. However, a few days ago he reminded me that he has exactly what I need.

So my point is, th... [ More ]

Reply #13

Mega-ThinkTank — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:47:09 GMT

Think of it as trading parts from a method/system. Or you can think of as Woman to Man: She got something he needs and he got something she wants (not need). Get it

Reply #12

justxploring — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:30:51 GMT

It seems to me, L.P. is like a place where you come to barter a trade...like they used to do in the old days before money. You got something of value that I need and I have something of value that you need and we trade. Simple as that.

Unless you can give me the 6 numbers that will be picked tonight in Florida so I can win $28 million (with a $3 bet) what do you have of value that I need? The big question is, if it were really possible, why would you? I mean, if you have the magic code

Reply #11

jarasan — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:00:48 GMT

Ask not what The Lottery Post can do for you, but what can you do for The Lottery Post?

Playing these jackpot games is risk in its purest form, no guarantees, high risk ratio to hitting a jackpot.

Try the challenges it is good practice.

Reply #10

RJOh — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 17:40:05 GMT

You know, if I had a system and it was actually a good one that worked I wouldn't share it with anyone.

You probably wouldn't be at LP looking for ideas to improve it either. That's true for most lottery players and that's the reason many LP members share ideas and theories that they think may help improve a system and not their systems. Someone still have to test those ideas and theories with an actual game to see if the results are convincing enough to add them to a system.

I've found t... [ More ]

Reply #9

DC81 — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 01:53:35 GMT

You know, if I had a system and it was actually a good one that worked I wouldn't share it with anyone. I might give out a set of numbers but no one is going to know what my system is but me, I wouldn't sell it either even though I could make a lot of quick money from it. That is because once it's out there it's out there and it would be just a matter of time (not very much time either) before it's rendered useless by the matrix being changed. I'd rather use it for as long as possible and get ev... [ More ]

Reply #8

four4me — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 18:39:06 GMT

Your first sentance in this topic: What would make us reveal our method/system

Reveal = give - share, all mean the same thing.

Some do, some don't, some will, some won't,

I cant count how many times we have had people join this site and start off with i have a system or found out if you do this and that then you'll win a jackpot. Lets share ideas and everything in between. And then when they cant find or get what they want from posters they start belittling us.

Some people might n... [ More ]

Reply #7

Mega-ThinkTank — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:49:27 GMT

Yeah Rjoh. You've been saying stuff like that to me since I got here. I admit right away, I never won a jackpot but I'm inching closer and closer and if there's an opportunity for me to gain more knowledge (meaningful knowledge), I'm going to do all I can to acquire such knowledge, rather that be by my own studies/methods or if I have share what I know with someone that can give me a new insight.

Is it so wrong for me to think that way

Reply #6

Mega-ThinkTank — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:43:43 GMT

Four4me,

Why do you and I have such strife? I've never said I wish people would come forward and give [me] their ideas. That's lame and ridiculous to even ask such a bold, stupid question.

The point of my argument here is to share, by means of barter trading. If I say I need information on how to pick first numbers of a whole number and someone may happens to have such a method or system, and he/she need information that I can be of value to, then the barter deal should commence.

I actu... [ More ]

Reply #5

DownandDirty — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:23:56 GMT

I don't care if anyone is holding back any info. My blend system probably incorporates many of the things you folks do with your methods anyway. Personally I enjoy developing/following my own plan of action.

So far, most of my methods incorporate some degree of intuition. Being totally on your game. Knowing the 14 is gonna pop. How can you teach or instruct someone to do that? How can you teach confidence and persistence?

So far, I have not won a jackpot to prove my thinking is correct. So... [ More ]

Reply #4

JonnyBgood07 — Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:32:19 GMT

I gotta say I applaud anyone 3times over for attempting to crack a big jp code of a sort.It takes balls.I've read some of your posts and I assume that's where your emphasis is?....What would make you think for a second that someone can tell you .. this is this and that is that and there you have it... ?I do believe though that that smidgen of info you're looking for to merge with your angle of things is somewhere here.I agree with rjoh and search search search..it sucks but it's a must.As much a... [ More ]

Reply #3

GASMETERGUY — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:55:48 GMT

So far you have not posted anything close to what I am doing. Therefore, I do not feel I could make a viable contribution to your threads.

I am sure there are others who feel the same. The problem is not that we will not share. There are tons of ideas way back in the early days. Go back and read the old posts. I am sure you will find something you can sink your teeth into.

In the interim, you can continue to post ideas. Perhaps, when you post an idea close to what some else is doing, you... [ More ]

Reply #2

four4me — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:35:12 GMT

Mega think tank

What did you come to this site for to put people down or find information. Many posters have provided their insite, yet it seems you want their inner most secrets about their lottery strategy.

You haven't openly shared one bit of information posted any ideas except for your one single minded idea that Quote by you( I come to realize the patterns are still showing up in its' natural sequencical order. Every single time.)

You have already started a topic about ho... [ More ]

Reply #1

RJOh — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 22:39:43 GMT

There are plenty of ideas posted at LP, you just have to look for them and take from the ones you like.

If you have some of your own that you think are to valuable to share then that's fine too because unless you've won a lottery jackpot then there's no proof that your ideas are any better than those already posted by other LP members. Good luck to you.

A risky proposition worth taking...

Mega-ThinkTank — Thu, 17 Jul 2008 21:32:30 GMT

What would make us reveal our method/system? It seems to me, L.P. is like a place where you come to barter a trade...like they used to do in the old days before money. You got something of value that I need and I have something of value that you need and we trade. Simple as that.

Now, I know there are some L.P. minds sitting around here and waiting for a member to slip up and spill some quality knowledge about the game. I even tried to break this vicious cycle of saying nothing but it seems t... [ More ]