<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Positive cash flow System?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/196497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Positive cash flow System?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1350252</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1350252</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:12:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rcbbuckeye</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts exactly. I watch how much I spend each week and throughout the year, and it adds up. But.... if I win the JP, or in the case of MM, even 2nd prize with the megaplier, and it would be more than worth the amount spent. Besides, it&#x27;s impossible to win if you don&#x27;t play.</p>]]></description>
			<category>rcbbuckeye</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1344062</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1344062</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:36:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Even though I know all that, I continue to play and try to beat the odds because I know that is the only way I will ever come out ahead. I&#x27;m prepare to lose a certain amount because I could do so much more if I won a jackpot than I could ever do with the amount I&#x27;m prepared to lose.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1344058</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1344058</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 18:23:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>joker17</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>That&#x27;s what I thought. And to add insult to injury, the odds of winning a JP is astronomical. Thanks Rjoh.</p>]]></description>
			<category>joker17</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1344016</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497/1344016</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:06:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>No such system exists. When the odds of winning the smallest prize is 1:10 and winning it pays $1 then you&#x27;re are never going to win more than you spend unless you win the jackpot. Payout amounts are such that you have to beat the odds of winning a prize by a factor of 100 or more just to get back what you spent to play.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Positive cash flow System?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/196497</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:37:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>joker17</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is there a system out there that can produce those results? (positive cash flow)<br /><br />This is the cross roads for systems to prove themselves.<br /><br />The proving grounds.<br /><br />There are three stipulations to qualify as a simple system. Those 3 criteria are integral in defining them. (systems)<br /><br />First: Simplicity.<br /><br />Second: Totally mechanical.<br /><br />Third: No long winded theories and possibilities.<br /><br />(Serious inquires only)....lol<br /><br />Ask your doctor to see if Zolox is right for you.<br /><br />Good Luck</p>]]></description>
			<category>joker17</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

