A Lotto that pays Child Expenses for 18 years or baby expenses for 6 years

Reply #21

psykomo — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:18:02 GMT

EVEN on HALLOWEEN PSYKOMKO support's children's^^^^^

psykomo

Reply #20

pumpi76 — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:17:38 GMT

How about a lottery whose funds go to Agriculture, i am talking a particular lotto whose revenue/fund, possible 100 million or 200 million a year goes towards Agriculture, specially agriculture states...Notice that i didnt say the Jackpot will go towards agriculture i said the funds will go towards Agriculture...No imagination whatsoever....

Jee you all heard it...

Not only that i dont know how much is going towards education from all the states but i think that: 50 billion in total is fro... [ More ]

Reply #19

SmoothJuice — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:24:04 GMT

People just need to learn how to wear protection and not have kids if they're not financially ready.

Reply #18

Stack47 — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:38:03 GMT

It just occurred to me that Pumpi doesn't understand it's the players that fund the jackpots and not the state lotteries. When we buy a ticket we already know that about 35 cents on the dollar will go into the states general fund or in some states it goes into a designated fund. I'm not sure that he fully understands that jackpots are taxed by some states and of course the Federal Government either.

Basically Pumpi is suggesting we the players should pay everyone's child support so the dead b... [ More ]

Reply #17

xandercage — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:12:22 GMT

Once again wow.....Pumpi maybe lotteries should be funded from the hard working persons payroll taxes and then awarded to welfare takers.

Reply #16

MoneyMoney — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:51:08 GMT

the only way to help yourself is if you are lucky and you hit big. no welfare lottery. forget it. pay and play of course you WILL WIN. GUARANTEE. 100%.

Reply #15

rdgrnr — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 05:13:17 GMT

pumpi, you have had some good ideas that I agree with but I want the record to show that I am staunchly against a lotto for midgets.

Reply #14

pumpi76 — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 18:17:56 GMT

How about a lotto that helps the disabled...?None Existent whatsoever...Can't believe it...

i dont believe it should help kids in kindergarden i believe it should help the disabled person...Listen anybody can be disabled or veterans...

You know NOT A SINGLE STATE has come up with the idea... HOW SHAMEFUL.. No wanter people hate....Never mind....

or a lotto for the elderly, or midgets or some of the funds for them....No imagination whatsoever...

Reply #13

joker17 — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:42:45 GMT

That's a great idea Pumpi. I have a good one too.

How about a lottery just for people who like to fish but can't afford bait, tackle boxes, rods and reels. Instead of winning money, they'll get a few year's supply of fishing gear and bait. This way, they can't spend all the money at once, like buying a 5 year supply of bait and it ends up spoiling.

Maybe even enough for one of those hats with the feathered hooks in them.

Even better......A lottery just for lesbian nazi hookers from... [ More ]

Reply #12

diamondpalace — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:22:19 GMT

Thanks for the comedy relieft.

Reply #11

Raven62 — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:38:30 GMT

It's not a good IDEA: Before Gambling one should Pay their Share of the the Child Support Responsibilities: So the Game You Suggest won't be necessary!

You can however, Play the Current Lottery Games: Then IF you Win: You can Spend the Winnings on Yourself.

Reply #10

Littleoldlady — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:00:40 GMT

They used some of the funds in TN to start a kindergarden program. That is fine but I don't think that lotteries should be set up to pay for some deadbeat's responsibility. In probably most if not all of the states, they already take child support and taxes owed out of the winner's money. That should be the extent of it.

Reply #9

TheGameGrl — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:13:54 GMT

in fairness, most state run lotteries even promote the social welfare concept. Here in PA *partial* funds from lottery revenue go to the elderly programs.

In other states it can be education, transportation , or other state aided programs. SO Pumpi isnt so far off the mark to suggest a revenue be for child care.etc.

I personally dont agree with it because there again it benefits only a group of people .....Make it something that the majority can use, Like maybe a discount on utility bills... [ More ]

Reply #8

four4me — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:50:04 GMT

I'll have a bucket O'crabs

Reply #7

PERDUE — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:27:59 GMT

This sound like a excellent idea and as a parent I wish it was a reality. But you know as well I do that in this imperfect world in which we live that will never be the case, especially with the crab in a bucket mentality we all have.

Reply #6

joshuakim — Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:27:20 GMT

I agree.

And if he/she is having difficulty putting food on the table, then the money shouldnt be spent on the lottery anyway. You should only gamble what you can afford.

Reply #5

Dollar419 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:56:02 GMT

I did not answer to state that you did not have any manners or to state that your are cold...you had asked for an honest opinion on your question and I just provide you an honest answer--no more or no less.

Reply #4

pumpi76 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:50:30 GMT

if people think that i am cold or have no manners: well think again...

Reply #3

Dollar419 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:49:56 GMT

I totally agree with you Coin Toss, lotteries are LOTTERIES --not meet to use for social welfare programs. You can only determine how the winning jackpot should be spent.

Reply #2

RJOh — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:29:40 GMT

Lotteries are designed to be a less than zero sum for the players. If it run by the states, the players (as a group) will get back 50% of what they spent or if it's run illegally by private groups they will get back 80% of what they spent. If a person has a family to support or other responsibilities, then they should take care them before spending money on lotteries.

Reply #1

Coin Toss — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:24:54 GMT

Pumpi76,

Lotteries are lotteries, not social welfare programs.

A Lotto that pays Child Expenses for 18 years or baby expenses for 6 years

pumpi76 — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:16:19 GMT

I know guys have reponsabilities but many times someone has to think weather to put food on the Table or pay the mortgage...Remember some people might have 3 or 4 kids and 2 more with another women...Is got to be terrible...

At least lend a helping hand...What i am saying is if there was a lotto that pay people's child support then people will have more money in their pocket which allows him to afford that health insurance or that NICE house he always wanted...What do you all think...Nice ide... [ More ]