Are we fooled to believe that there's a system?

Reply #88

Guru101 — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 06:34:43 GMT

I've been getting a lot of hits on KY Cashball. I know my system works, it's just a matter of being able to chop the Pick 6 game down to where I can hit 4/6 and 5/6 more often and hopefully a 6/6! I'm going to be testing a new filter pretty soon, so I'm hoping for some good results, and I believe there will be! I can't wait to win Hoosier Lotto

Reply #87

LotteryTechInc — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:44:25 GMT

LUCKY LOSER

Thanks glad you enjoyed my post

Reply #86

Coin Toss — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 22:09:50 GMT

Jordans121

Not just priceless, absolutely priceless, considering your avatar:

There are systems, the real system is the one YOU CREATE!

You win your choice of any room you want at the Institute for the Lottery Insane

Reply #85

RJOh — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:23:57 GMT

According to lottery websites the odds of having a winning ticket can vary from 1:10 (10%) for a pick5 game to 1:40 (3%) for a jackpot game like MegaMillions and yet there are predictors at LP who consistently do better than that. That tells me these predictors aren't just randomly picking their combinations but are using a strategy that improves their odds of winning. If the payouts were equal to even a third the odds of winning, these strategies would make a profit and lotteries recognize this... [ More ]

Reply #84

Lucky Loser — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 16:43:39 GMT

I'll tell you what, I coud sit and read posts such as this and similiar one's by DeltaDown and be as happy as a pig in slop!!! It just doesn't get any plainer...there are systems but, one must simply develop their own based on personal studies.

One must actually live for these Pick games in order to discover their system of play. Once this takes place, you'll understand not only HOW to play but, more importantly, WHY to play certain times and ways. You cannot play this game on every single d... [ More ]

Reply #83

rdgrnr — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 11:14:13 GMT

Random is as random does.

Reply #82

pumpi76 — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 09:21:42 GMT

the lottery is random but to me true random does not exist...

Reply #81

Jordans121 — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:36:30 GMT

Right now I have 4 vtrac systems, 1 which is most valuable but I have a secret system as well that I only have to play about 12 numbers for about 3 draws twice in a wk. However, one cannot hit every draw. Its impossible. What one must do is learn how to track numbers in an unconventional way like I do. Again my method is very profitable because I know how to use it. Understand the lottery officials want you to play everyday but I surely will not. This distinguishes the veterans from the addicted... [ More ]

Reply #80

pepper1 — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:13:59 GMT

Yes there is a system I believe that I have it. My problem is human error.

Reply #79

Jordans121 — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:37:11 GMT

If hitting once or twice a wk in pick 3 is a real system then I am on my way

Reply #78

LotteryTechInc — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:30:56 GMT

I agree because I've never been able too hit using quick-picks or just randomly selecting numbers but when I started using software and strategies I started winning and it was from strategies I developed for selecting numbers then I used software too generate my combo's.

Reply #77

Jordans121 — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:22:03 GMT

There are systems, the real system is the one YOU CREATE

Reply #76

LotteryTechInc — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:18:53 GMT

LUCKY PLAY and INTELLIGENT PLAY are the only ways too win luck works with players that use anniversary,birthday,ages and other important numbers in there life also those that just select numbers randomly from the playslip.When you hit this way it's called LUCK but when you have a strategy/system for selecting your numbers whether it's using software or number system of your own creation or purchased online then your using INTELLIGENT means of playing because your trying too target specific patte... [ More ]

Reply #75

GYM RICE — Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:12:47 GMT

Does random exist

Reply #74

Dollar419 — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:15:00 GMT

I agree, it's just the LUCK OF THE DRAW and no matter how many lottery systems are out there, you have to be at the right place, at the right time to buy the winning ticket, either a QP or your own chosen numbers; also positive thinking wouldn't hurt as well.

Reply #73

Guru101 — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 19:55:58 GMT

Someone with a system for a jackpot game only needs it to work once. It doesn't need to hit on a regular basis.

Reply #72

rsa2048 — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:05:38 GMT

rdgrnr asked for a system without computers and algorithms, so I gave him a version of the system without them with the caveat that the computer would probably do a better job at picking the numbers. Now, a simplification for you, Coin Toss, would be an educated guess. It's like multiple choice when you were in school. If you can eliminate a few answers, it greatly increases the odds of a successfully guess (or luck as you call it). Furthermore, if you know that your teacher has a tendency to pu... [ More ]

Reply #71

Coin Toss — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 06:21:30 GMT

From rsa2048's post above:

Roll dice.

See rdgrnr, it's all luck, even when it's disguised as a system.

Reply #70

rsa2048 — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:25:52 GMT

Hmmm... The method I described requires as few as one but potentially millions of iterations, but let me take a shot at simplification. I can describe a method with reduced odds, but much better than a quick pick. So, if I were to do this without programming, I would:

Print out the list of lottery numbers drawn from a lottery of your choice. Randomly pick a draw as the first. Pick the first number from that draw using the first number. Roll dice. Count down that many to the next draw. Pick y... [ More ]

Reply #69

rdgrnr — Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:53:00 GMT

You got anything a backwoods hillbilly could understand boss?

I keep slammin' Jack but it ain't helpin'. Well, maybe a couple more fingers...

I'll get back to ya.

Reply #68

rsa2048 — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:24:01 GMT

I mentioned I would post a system in the event of discovering a new system. What I present here is the product of my initial research.I will not answer any questions at this time. Also, If you want to apply this system to a lottery that uses an extra ball (ie, MegaMillions, PowerBall), that is an exercise left to the reader. This system/algorithm will increase your chances of winning.

Here is the system in a nutshell:

Acquire the past winning numbers in the form ofa csv file. (They are ra... [ More ]

Reply #67

LotteryTechInc — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:08:22 GMT

LUCK isn't the only system because it's not a system,no one can hit on a regular basis with luck and no one has too the best of my knowledge, a REAL system would enable you too hit on a regular basis not necessarily everyday but say once or twice a week.The reason quick-picks hit is because of the odds if the odds of hitting a Pick-5 jackpot are 1 in 380,000 and the majority of the states population is playing that game then your gonna have a winner possiblly more than one because 380,000 ticket... [ More ]

Reply #66

time*treat — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:32:35 GMT

@CT: Yeah, that's best. Not just be the house, but also have the laws prohibiting any competition with the house.

Reply #65

Coin Toss — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 05:39:03 GMT

time*treat,

Well the rule about tying up terminals was because of the team play by the Aussies (I think it was) that zonked the Virginia lottery.

But how many ways did they split it and how much did each get?

As megamillionaire said, lotteries paid for the Revolutionary War. Going back further than that Keno in its original form built the Great Wall of China.

In any form of gambling management is very concerned, in fact paranois about the integrity of the game but for the most part t... [ More ]

Reply #64

time*treat — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:52:05 GMT

And as the games have been around longer, more and more changes have been made to decrease the effectiveness of older systems.

The lower-tier prizes have been made very small

Matrices have been enlarged (some p5 games went from 5 of 30 to 5 of 39, the first 5 in PB went from 5 in 45 to currently 5 in 59)

Rules about how much time you can spend at the terminal have been put in

These are not the lottery games of yesteryear.

While the spokespeople for the games will tell you th... [ More ]

Reply #63

BobP — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 04:26:08 GMT

IMHO lotteries of the past were in fact raffles. Numbered slips were sold. Only recently (roughly the last 50 years depending on where we're talking) have we been able to select our own numbers to play.

We make our own luck, the harder we work at something the luckier we get.

BobP

Reply #62

tiggs95 — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:33:13 GMT

Great post..Luck is the only system..

Reply #61

megamillionaire — Sat, 13 Feb 2010 01:20:33 GMT

The only guaranteed system is to play every possible combination. The bills for the Revolutionary War was paid for with a lottery. If, there was a system, someone would have found it by now and there'd be no lotteries.

Reply #60

time*treat — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 03:11:32 GMT

One percent wasn't a minimum, just pointing out that a winning system need not carry a high hit ratio (at least for jackpot games). The OP didn't say which game he had in mind, so I went with one that would require the fewest number of times of matching all the numbers to have the highest amount of WOO-HOO!. Since many people play for years without showing a profit, I figured once per year is better than most are doing.

You didn't say anything about the airline's ratio, though.... [ More ]

Reply #59

Stack47 — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 05:36:59 GMT

I played 5/37s and 5/39s long enough to know, I was lucky the few times when 5 out of the 15 numbers I choose were drawn. However I wasn't lucky enough to have the 5 numbers in the same combo. It's possible if I played long enough I could put 15 numbers into the correct order and hit the jackpot but that would require another system and at $20 a drawing, it's expensive.

With Pick-3 games it's possible with a sound money management system to make a small profit. Most systems I've read are gear... [ More ]

Reply #58

RJOh — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 02:50:26 GMT

That's a problem if a system have to predict 1 PB jackpot before it's classified as a good system. A system could be destined to win a jackpot in a year but abandoned early because it didn't show a profit soon enough. The way payouts are designed for jackpot games, matching half the winning numbers pays $2-$10 so a system that constantly beats 1/50-1/350 odds with 10-20 lines is a loser.

System players have to come up with their own parameters to define a good system and stick with them until... [ More ]

Reply #57

ca-dreamin* — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:45:29 GMT

Maybe we're fooled to believe there is no system.

Maybe we try so hard to pick apart the games looking for a system that we overlook the simplest of things......including the system. HAHAHA

Reply #56

time*treat — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:19:23 GMT

A system wouldn't need a very high success ratio in order to be considered good.

A method that only predicted 1 powerball jackpot per year (success ratio 1%, good enough) would be considered great .. no, make that .. GREAT!!!

At the same time, NO ONE would fly an airline with the slogan 99% of our flights are crash-free! (success ratio 99%, not good enough

Reply #55

LotteryTechInc — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:51:14 GMT

You have too be ONE with the numbers that's the key and when you accomplish this you can almost FEEL what the numbers are going too do,this takes time and much practice I'm working on it and so far the results are promising I am able too select 2-3 correct numbers in the Pick-4, will continue too practice until I can get all 4. Intuition or Sixth Sense can be considered a system I guess and if yours is strong you can pick winning numbers.

Reply #54

Delta Draw — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:10:17 GMT

I know nothing about mechanical failures in games, but physical dynamics sure make things interesting.

Sentence two and three in your post are powerful statements. Be careful of new world science, you could be labeled a heretic for challenging traditional perspectives. Any such system must be questioned as blind optimism or the imagination of the insane.

Reality and tradition cannot occupy the same place in people s minds. It s okay if the world is flat or that the sun revolves around the

Reply #53

RJOh — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:45:51 GMT

You will know if you are getting close by an increase in winnings or mysterious mechanical failures occurring each time you play :)

Mechanical failures seldom happen, if you're only playing when there's a mechanical failure then you are seldom playing.

I will post here if I discover something new :).

I assume by that statement that somethings have already been discovered. Do you have a list of the old discoveries

Reply #52

rsa2048 — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:03:38 GMT

I believe there is a system or pattern that can greatly increase the odds of winning. What is required is a fresh approach that derives numbers from something we haven't considered before. I have solved many problems by simply taking steps to visualize the data and to then transform the data by some known quantities no matter how simple, complex, or sparse this information may be. It is then possible to optimize your approach and perhaps remove or extract only the data you need to solve your pro... [ More ]

Reply #51

BobP — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 22:36:15 GMT

Absense of evidence, is not evidence of absense.

It is impossible for casino and lottery systems to make a profit over time as static systems. To play at a profit over time the system must require the user to make a choice and that choice determines whether the player wins or loses.

Simple System:

Split the 220 number box field into four equal parts of 55 numbers each. Pick one and play it, one in four chance of winning. Repeat.

BobP

Reply #50

rcbbuckeye — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:58:56 GMT

In my opinion, trying systems is part of what makes playing the lottery fun (along with winning). For some, it's trying to find the system. For others, like me, it's trying to find a system. Really, we can just play using QP's, how boring.... or look for ways to pick numbers that may have a good chance to hit.

I do believe that in the P3 and maybe P4, a system can help a player win more than if he just plays QP's. In the jackpot games, well, the odds pretty much overcome any system that a per... [ More ]

Reply #49

Shawn67 — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:45:03 GMT

There is not, and never will be a system that can beat the lottery. There are many strategies available though that can help you to make more intelligent decisions before you throw your money down. Statistics are your friend in this business. The best method anyone can use is simply to use statistics to wisely pick as few numbers as possible to play, and hope for the best. This, however, does not exclude the fact that the best strategy may not have been discovered yet. Just my 2 cents worth.

Reply #48

joker17 — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:35:15 GMT

Ha Ha....

I also like the one about Hitler not being able to go to the Michael Jackson concert....hee hee....

Reply #47

LotteryTechInc — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:34:55 GMT

We already have the tools available too help you win a jackpot it's just a matter of learning how too use them properly so you can get that jackpot in the Pick-3,4,5 or 6 games.

Reply #46

Coin Toss — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:04:36 GMT

Hi cope,

Welcome.

That might depend on which side of the Mississippi you're on....or maybe which side of the Mason-Dison line.

Reply #45

cope — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:57:25 GMT

Well I used the double-reverse divide by Pi times your height divided by your weght system and added 223 to the answer and then broke it down in to six numbers....

That system will never work.

Everyone knows you have to subtract 223 from the answer, not add 223.

Reply #44

Coin Toss — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:33:43 GMT

Results speak louder than words.

In the sense that one did beats 1,000 gonnas , one jackpot produced by one system would speaker louder than a plethora of theorhetical jackpots produced by who knows how many systems.

When somebody on this board, or someone at a press conference says, Well I used the double-reverse divide by Pi times your height divided by your weght system and added 223 to the answer and then broke it down in to six numbers and it won $54,000,000 , until soemthing like tha... [ More ]

Reply #43

Delta Draw — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 20:31:52 GMT

No Santa?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hdIhNQKgMdg

Reply #42

joker17 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 05:21:38 GMT

If you want to debate about religion or god, we'd probably agree, and the discussion would quickly be over. But the subject at hand is Systems , and in order for someone to create one, they'd have to see patterns and apply them to the System .

You're automatically equating patterns with tooth fairies and the such. My quote you keep using in your argument is about patterns, not beliefs. Surely, other things apply, but not all things as you make it. There are exceptions to every rule you know.... [ More ]

Reply #41

rdgrnr — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 03:22:35 GMT

A code will be found in the study of synchronal sound someday.

And it will be music to someone's ears.

Reply #40

pumpi76 — Mon, 08 Feb 2010 01:58:18 GMT

The only system/pattern that can win the Powerball or the lotto or Italy s Pick6/90 with less than 3 tickets has a: German Swatchstika missing 1 leg and a: computer X not a regular x on it...(like 2 united U s on it)...I can crack the pattern...

Is the only system so far that i ve seen that can win Powerball with less than: 3 tickets...

Reply #39

badboy00z — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:46:03 GMT

No it's not. I was just going off about what You said: just because we can't see something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I made my argument using your logic. We lack evidence of God's existence and yet millions of people believe in him. So why can't that be said about other fairy tale beings?

Oxygen can be seen, just not with the naked eye. People knows that it exists because it is proven by science.

Ever watch A Beautiful Mind? The guy sees patterns and codes that isn't there and it tur... [ More ]

Reply #38

Guru101 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:22:50 GMT

I'm not fooled. I have my own system and it's gonna help me win Hoosier Lotto.

Reply #37

joker17 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 06:06:50 GMT

Sorry, but your logic and analogy is flawed. Santa or any other mythical creature will be just that. MYTHICAL .......

Everyone who is somewhat sane knows that Santa is not real. Clearly, oxygen exists and everyone knows it, but it can't be seen. I'm only speaking of tangible facts.

BTW, I was also referring to patterns. Let's stay focused here. Just because a consistent pattern can't be seen by the mortal eye, doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

Next....

Reply #36

pumpi76 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 05:07:22 GMT

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208395

Reply #35

badboy00z — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:11:36 GMT

All computerized drawings can never be truely random since they are governed by algorithms. The person(s) who write the algorithms will know how to beat it. A professor level mathematician can probably predict it given enough sample size and a super computer to analyze the drawings.

I would love to see high speed videos of drawings to see how the balls really move around.

Reply #34

four4me — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 03:09:08 GMT

There is no system that will win 100% of the time.

With all the math and computer geek's in the world if there was a system it would be out by now.

You cant break the lottery, safeguards are in place to prevent that from happening.

Reply #33

pumpi76 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:17:45 GMT

also the state lottery doesnt realized that if someone had a system to crack their games...Nobody will bring down the state lottery, nobody in their right mind will bring it down, will bring down the state lottery...they just want piece of mind....that s like demolishing all the banks of the world, nobody in their right mind if they could do it will do it...

Reply #32

sully16 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 02:03:15 GMT

IN STATISTICS...There is something called the 4 m's man, machine ,method and material. these 4 things all figure into the drawings.

1. man..the person who is either pushing the buttons or pulling the lever ..his or hers timing between each push.

2. machine..air flow ..temperature.

3.method..drop down balls, pop up balls.

4. material...type of plastic used ,some air filled plastics can still have temperature variations..cold air sinks, hot air floats up.

all of these thing can effe... [ More ]

Reply #31

JonnyBgood07 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:52:55 GMT

for example in jersey today...it was no mystery a 5 was a strong candidiate for first position

..it was 1 less than a recent P4

Drawing Date Pick 3 Pick 4

Midday Evening Midday Evening

Sat, Feb 6, 2010 5-0-6

Fri, Feb 5, 2010 8-8-4 4-1-5 8-2-2-7 4-7-2-3

Thu, Feb 4, 2010 1-4-8 6-4-3 0-3-5-6 2-5-3-6

Wed, Feb 3, 2010 3-4-9 7-3-0 5-8-9-0 0-2-5-2

Tue, Feb 2, 2010 4-5-0 3-9-3 6-1-3-0 5-9-1-3

Reply #30

JonnyBgood07 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:48:45 GMT

..Are we fooled to believe that there's a system?

..take a hard look at vertical formations is all I can say.It's about a rythm more than a system that is very real if you can master it.It's no wonder why most basic p3 systems revolve around plus1 minus 1 type stuff and they work.

Reply #29

tiggs95 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:43:13 GMT

I checked out the Mass lottery and that's pretty neat how they got it..A lot of small payouts but you take what they give you..

Reply #28

Hermanus104 — Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:14:17 GMT

I do not think that there is a system with true lottery drawings (i.e. machine and ping-pong ball), but there are definitely interesting patterns that emerge (e.g. some numbers showing up more frequently than other numbers).

As for computerized drawings, I feel that there has to be a system. I just do not know what it is. I do not think that computer drawings are random, although they certainly seem to be.

Reply #27

Coin Toss — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:53:17 GMT

For those who believe in systems for the lottery, consider this.

An original KENO ticket consisted of 80 Chinese characters, not numbers. So people naturally played their names, their family names, etc...

KENO financed the building of the Great Wall of China. Think about that.

KENO in its casino format, 80 numbers and you pick how many you want to play for, the max being 15 out of the 20 drawn out of 80, has never had anyone hit a 15 spot.

One time at the Las Vegas Club in Vegas, a c... [ More ]

Reply #26

Coin Toss — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:33:05 GMT

Check out the Massachusetts Lottey website. They don't have a Pick 3 game exactly, but on ther Pick 4 they have 4, any 3, any 2, and any 1 on the payout chart.

Not sure how it works, but sounds interesting.

Reply #25

LotteryTechInc — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 20:23:45 GMT

Yeah that's the best way too play it works for me do you wheel by position?? when I hit boxed in Pick-4 I wheeled by group I chose 8 numbers 4 from the low (0-4) and 4 from the high (5-9) when I hit straight in the Pick-3 I wheel by position 6 numbers each. I seperate the numbers into 5 pairs 01,23,45,67,89 and choose 3 pairs which gives you 6 numbers I use a 20 draw history too help determine which pairs too select I also color code them with high lighters so it's easier too see what's going on... [ More ]

Reply #24

Dawn32 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:27:17 GMT

I have my own system of wheeling p4 numbers (I wheel 6 of them) by picking more hot and lukewarm and only one cold number. I almost always get 3 out of 4, which is nothing cause no money is won, but its closer then when I pick random numbers. So I think my odds of winning go up using my little system.

Reply #23

LotteryTechInc — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:42:17 GMT

Well how can it be a system if it doesn't work or you can't get it too work?? my point was there is no system that will give you the exact numbers drawn whether it's pick-3/4 or pick-5/6.Strategies seem too work best at least they do for me

Reply #22

LotteryTechInc — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:22:44 GMT

The problem is trying too pick the exact 3,4,5 or 6 numbers in the various games people that do attempt this win by luck playing anniversary,ages,birthdays etc... but players in this forum that don't use those methods are fighting a losing battle trying too pick the exact numbers.There is NO SYSTEM but there are STRATEGIES that can increase your chances of winning.The way too do that is too select a GROUP of numbers too try and TRAP your winning set then apply filters too reduce your combos this... [ More ]

Reply #21

bobby623 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 18:00:06 GMT

Hi Raven62

Anything is possible.

If lottery folks want to cheat, I suppose they can figure out ways to do it. However, lottery drawings are supervised by

lot of folks, including potential whistleblowers.

I have a strategy for choosing (guessing) numbers to play.

I doubt the lottery cheaters know what my numbers are.

I just choose to give the lottery folks the benefit of the doubt.

It they are cheating, there isn't anything I can do about it.

Life is difficult enough wi... [ More ]

Reply #20

pumpi76 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:54:04 GMT

if you let: 1,2,3=1 then 4,5,6=2 then 7,8,9=3 and so on until you reach to: 18 on the Pick4/18 combination game then is a: Pick4/6...So to win Powerball you got to guess 4 numbers from 1-6...

you only need to win Powerball...ONCE....take away that habit of yours of wanting to win it every drawing....

Reply #19

Raven62 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:39:25 GMT

Lottery commissions spend a tremendous amount of effort making sure the numbers appear random.

Strobe lights are used in industry to stop the motion of rotating and moving objects.

They could also be used to freeze the motion of Numbered Balls whirling around in an air chamber.

When the Numbered Ball with the desired Number on it is near the exit chute, the chute could be opened. (Almost sounds like a game of skill)

Are Mechanical Ball Machines really as rig-free as peopl... [ More ]

Reply #18

FLATRANSPLANT — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:37:22 GMT

Well said Raven62. That is exactly what I do here in Florida. I take the TOP number drawn in both Cash 3 Play 4 and play them everyday. There is no lottery system that will predict numbers. Any number can come out any given time day or night. It's all LUCK! I've won more money on my hunches than any system out there.

Reply #17

pumpi76 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:32:22 GMT

There are 4 statesment that are said repeatedly but are different...They are:

Can the Pick6/Powerball be won...

Is there a system that let s you win the lotto...

Can the Pick6/Powerball BE CRACKED....

If Pick6/Powerball can be cracked can it happen with less than: $5 tickets or $10 tickets or $1 ticket...

The first 3 are possible...The last one is almost impossible...

Can the Pick6/Powerball be won...Yes, happens all the time no not trying to be funny, i find it interesting tha... [ More ]

Reply #16

calabs — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:30:05 GMT

I don't think I could have said it better Raven. Everyone must agree that each draw is a random pick of 3, or 4 or 5 etc. numbers. Just like the roll of the dice, where you will always have a 1:12 chance of rolling any given number, so is the lottery. Following trends (with a little luck) you can catch these trends on the up swing (hot numbers) or down swing coming back up (cold numbers). While it is not completely predictable, tracking over many years gives one a fair idea of what's coming down... [ More ]

Reply #15

bobby623 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:34:53 GMT

Jordans121

Here in Texas, the Pick 3 and Pick 4 ball machines are on some type automated program. That is, the balls don't come up at regular intervals. Sometimes the time delay lasts for 10 seconds or more.

I think this is a feature that allows the machines to provide 'random' results.

If the balls come up at set intervals, it's possible someone could use it to their advantage.

I've watched the Florida Pick 3 drawings. They use separate machines and a lottery employee triggers so... [ More ]

Reply #14

Raven62 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:32:38 GMT

If you think about it, there's really only two ways to play: You keep track of the numbers and either bet on the ones that come up most frequently, because they're Hot, or bet on the numbers that haven't been chosen yet, because they inevitably will be. Brad Duke

That and Good Luck

Reply #13

tiggs95 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:21:49 GMT

MADDOG10 and Coin Toss you guys are my heroes..I've been preaching this a long time..LUCK is the only answer..

Reply #12

MADDOG10 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:07:08 GMT

There is a system out there.

It's called LUCK and if it's not prevalent when you buy your tickets, it isn't going to happen....

Reply #11

Coin Toss — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:03:22 GMT

Many people claim to have systems to beat casino games. Those people are almost always selling those systems, they make more money that way than playing the systems because the systems don't work.

They may have a lucky day or two, but the systems don't work consistently. The only system that works consistently is being the house.

Thorpe's classic book, Beat the Dealer, did more to popularize the game of Blackjack than anyrhing else had done. It increased revenue for the house.

The odds... [ More ]

Reply #10

tiggs95 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:50:42 GMT

There is no lottery system............

Reply #9

badboy00z — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:32:46 GMT

Just because we can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

So you don't deny the existence of Santa Clause or any other mythical creatures/ beings

Reply #8

badboy00z — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:16:39 GMT

I agree that nature has patterns but balls bouncing around inside a spinning wheel? Maybe if all the variables remain consant then there might be a pattern.

Reply #7

time*treat — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:51:42 GMT

In theory, a cup-and-handle pattern shouldn't predict a winning stock, but traders look for them.

Reply #6

Jordans121 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 08:22:36 GMT

Although there is no system because like Joker said we dont have the mental capacity, We still can play at a profit which is what it is all about. You have to remember that every lottery is different and is designed to take as much money as possible (for education,lol). Who knows if there is a fix, certainly the lottery owners are not going to tell the customers that. For instance, here in Illinois our draw machine is manipulated by the person who is pulling the draws. the first ball takes a sec... [ More ]

Reply #5

LadyMylena — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:46:41 GMT

I made this several years ago, with one of my favorite quotes

So true.

Reply #4

joker17 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:39:46 GMT

Everything in life has a pattern to it. Just because we can't see it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

It may be a vey complex pattern that is so beyond our understanding, it defies common sense. Who knows?

Look at life itself. Given enough time, like billions of years, in a soup of potentials, basic amino acids can become complex, living and thinking creatures.

Anything is possible....given enough time.

Reply #3

badboy00z — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:32:25 GMT

I really don't see how any system can predict what numbers will be drawn from a spinning wheel and balls.

Reply #2

GASMETERGUY — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:54:35 GMT

I do not believe a system exists today. I do believe one will be developed and by someone who is a member of this site. There are just too many of us working to achieve that goal not to be sucessful.

Nor do I believe 5th grade math will unravel the secret algorithym. If adding and substracting would get the job done, Newton, Einstien, Hisenberg, Bohr, and a host of other great mathematicians would have discovered and published the proof. This is not to say that math will not come into play a... [ More ]

Reply #1

joker17 — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:35:27 GMT

Like I've wrote many times in the past, years ago.

There is a system that can beat the game, even if the matrix is made harder to hit by the officials.

It has to be what I coined...a Morphing system, where criteria is changing after every game. And that's where the problem lies for us humans at this point of evolution. The vast amount of tweaking needed to correctly predit the 6 numbers is unattainable to us. It's elusive because not only are there so many variables, but how to interpret t... [ More ]

Are we fooled to believe that there's a system?

ambelamba — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 05:02:24 GMT

Nope, I am not being paranoid.

This is what I read from Maxim magazine years ago. It claimed that the system indeed exists. But, lottery guys don't just sit there and watch their system gets broken into. They constantly work on the 'system' to prevent anyone from having unfair advantage.

Personally, I don't buy it. Maxim and FHM (now defunct) make up a lot of crap. Truth is, it's a matter of statistics. When someone really discovers the system, all the authority has to do is to up the ma... [ More ]