<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>California Own MegaMillions: Hypothetically speaking: $500 million Jackpots...</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/208976" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: California Own MegaMillions: Hypothetically speaking: $500 million Jackpots...</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1564471</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1564471</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 05:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>But believe it or not since California will have its own MegaMillion with $300 million and $400 million jackpot, is good also to have:<br /><br />Virginia Cash5 but that it pays the entire Home Mortgages, complete mortages paid...Have something JUST like Virginia Cash5 but that it pays Home Mortgages...With lots of aggregate money...And not have pick5...<br /><br />have Pick3, Virginia Cash5 that pays mortgages and California Own MegaMillions...And instead of having lots of scratchoffs just have 1 scratchoffs t... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1564471">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1563386</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1563386</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>could it be because of the real estate? Things cost more in california than anywhere else including homes, so most of a person s paycheck goes into paying for his/her expensive home the little that is left back goes into other forms of recreation, the lottery will be the last form of recreation...And california has the largest population of lations i think that: 70% of the state is Latino and if you notice latinos are more on a strick diet when it comes to earning more money compared to their ca... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1563386">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1559219</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1559219</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:11:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>While California should have more gamblers just based on their large population, their per capita lottery spending ranks near the bottom of state lotteries. The per capita spending in West Virginia is $862 compared to California&#x27;s $83.<br /><br />http://www.ohiolottery.com/profits/compare.html</p>]]></description>
			<category>Stack47</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1558894</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1558894</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:28:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>California will have more gamblers than most states is expected but does it have more gamblers respectively/proportional to its population size and that s what i think is the problem...Put it this way if every state had the same population that california has and it was even across states California will have less gamblers....that s what i meant...<br /><br />I expect that if California has 9 times the amount of population as a: 3 million population state i will expect California to have 9 times more ga... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1558894">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1557883</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976/1557883</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:09:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Coin Toss</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>pumpi<br /><br />I think is because there is less gamblers in California i dont know all i am saying...<br /><br />pumpi,<br /><br />An estimated 40% of Las Vegas business is people from Southern California who come by car.<br /><br />The Sunday Los Angeles papers are loaded with ads for Vegas.<br /><br />In other words, So. California alone has more gamblers than some states.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Coin Toss</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>California Own MegaMillions: Hypothetically speaking: $500 million Jackpots...</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:17:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Isnt it true that Powerball is played in either 25 or 30 states and megamillions is played in i think is 13 states or 15 cant remember that good...<br /><br />Isnt the population of California 29 million or 31 million...There are a lot of states that got less than 3 million population...So 29 million is like: 9 states with 3 million population just shy 4 states out of the 13 states...<br /><br />So why can t California have its own: Megamillions with a starting jackpot of: $12 million or $15 million just like M... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/208976">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

