I'm Excited...Check this out

Reply #19

ranman17 — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:55:00 GMT

For some reason I thought you couldn't play your own state online.

Reply #18

aanewyork — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:06:46 GMT

Your profits could be HIGHER Ranman if you played online.......$900 instead of $500. Believe me...that extra $400 makes a BIG difference. Check your email. I sent you something.

Reply #17

bashley572 — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 16:21:50 GMT

CONGRATS that makes EVERY month this year it has worked

Reply #16

ranman17 — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:20:07 GMT

The system worked even with the month starting with a double.....my numbers were 949, 959, 969....499 fell tonight

Reply #15

shawnee — Sun, 27 Jun 2010 00:11:51 GMT

the 949 came as 499 ...hope you caught it

Reply #14

ranman17 — Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:55:43 GMT

929 came today...I would have had 959 969 949....but the 9's are showing up...there is still hope

Reply #13

ranman17 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:35:16 GMT

Yep. So far June is frustrating me. No hits on the 959, 949, 969. I don't know if this is due to the fact that the month started with a double. I am still watching it. If it does not hit I am also watching June based on 6/2/10 Mid-day which was not a double. If this number produces I would play 001, 000, 009. If you look you will see that 070 hit on 6/8/10 but I would not have had that number.

If you are familiar with sister numbers you will see that they are often successful as well i.e.... [ More ]

Reply #12

bashley572 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 14:27:14 GMT

NO (BLEEPING) WAY!!!! That is TOO cool - you use the FIRST number of the month to figure out what the double is going to be. So you start playing on the eve of the first day and you HIT for $1500 that day---NICE

Reply #11

ranman17 — Thu, 17 Jun 2010 02:04:29 GMT

I am sorry I took so long to respond. No, the reason April was so profitable was that the first double to come up in my calculations was 110 and so I played 110 and I played up one and down one so all together I played 110, 119, 111 and 111 came out. Now because it costs me $3.00 to play a double number at $1.00 combo it costs me $9.00 per draw to play my three picks. However when I have a triple in my picks that number does not need to be played $1.00 combo for $3.00 it can be played $3.00 stra... [ More ]

Reply #10

Todd — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:08:30 GMT

When you're continuing to discuss the same topic, please so not start a new topic -- post a reply to your existing topic. Thanks

Reply #9

bashley572 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:17:38 GMT

Ok, next question. I see that in April you MADE alot of money did you SPEND more on the doubles (more than $1.00 combo) or did you play more than once in the month? If you played more did you just 'restart' the count after hitting?

Jan. - $239.00

Feb. - $136.00

Mar. - $428.00

Apr. - $1,491.00

May - $374.00

June - Still watching.

Reply #8

ranman17 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 01:07:28 GMT

The idea of playing the hot doubles simply comes from back testing the system I posted earlier. I noticed that the hot doubles from one month produce winners in the following month.

I am also VERY fond of doubles. You see I want to hit straight but I do not have a system sophisticated enought to give me straight wins and I can't afford to play non doubles combo because that cost $6.00 per play per number, it can get expensive but with doubles you can play $1.00 combo which only cost $3.0... [ More ]

Reply #7

bashley572 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:36:12 GMT

Thanks for the numbers you are chasing. I like the way you look at numbers. Backtesting helps but I notice that patterns change and I need to adjust my playing to them.

Whats the idea of playing the hot doubles from last month this month? Other than the fact that they are hot and should keep coming out?

Also I luv the 95 pair so I am on the 959

Reply #6

ranman17 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:31:53 GMT

I did what you said and it started working the way I describe December of last year. before that the doubles I find do hit but the third number is not one up or one down, i.e. October last year I would have played 766, 666, 866 but 661 came down and November I would have played 188, 088, 288 but 888 came down and so it is from Jan. 2009 thru Nov. 2009 and then in Dec. 2009 my system has started working. It may run in cycles but it's the best I have come up with.

One more thing while look... [ More ]

Reply #5

ranman17 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:25:08 GMT

959, 969, 949

Reply #4

bashley572 — Tue, 15 Jun 2010 00:10:37 GMT

Interesting idea, and looks like its paying off - congrats! Whats the doubles you are watching for in JUNE

Reply #3

Jordans121 — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:35:04 GMT

Do more back testing you may be dissapointed

Reply #2

THE BUG — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:32:23 GMT

interesting i checked out ga midday played 952on 6/01 --first dbl to show was 211--

6/10 played 131 hummm

tks for sharing

Reply #1

ranman17 — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:25:20 GMT

01/31/2010 E

4

3 5 913

01/31/2010 M 6 6 8 123

01/30/2010 E 4 4 5 036

01/30/2010 M 3 4 1 123

01/29/2010 E 4 8 2 159

01/29/2010 M 3 3 3 123

01/28/2010 E 8 6 5 272

01/28/2010 M 0 6 6 123

01/27/2010 E 9 6 1 395

01/27/2010 M 5 8 4 123

01/26/2010 E 9 6 7 418

01/26/2010 M 8 2 7 123

01/25/2010 E 7 7 2 531

01/25/2010 M 7 8 5 123

01/24/2010 E 0 3 7 654

01/24/2010 M 3 0 3 123

01/23/2010 E 9 8 6 777

01/23/2010 M 6 1... [ More ]

I'm Excited...Check this out

ranman17 — Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:19:49 GMT

I have been working on something and so far it has produced a winner in NY EVERY month since January 2010.

All I do is take the first draw of the month and I add 123 to that number using lotto math and then I add 123 to that number and so on until I come all the way back around to the number I started with, but here is the twist. I then go back and find the first double that this math has produced. I take that number and then go up one and down one, i.e. if the double is 272 I play 272, 262 2... [ More ]