<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Heard this Time after Time: If you trap the Jackpot numbers on different lines Why not Switch them</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/217211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Heard this Time after Time: If you trap the Jackpot numbers on different lines Why not Switch them</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707276</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707276</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:48:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#x27;s obvious you have no idea how difficult it is to trap all 5 drawn numbers from a small group of numbers or how many combinations are in full wheels in any pick-5 game.<br /><br />He probably knows but some times facts get in the way of what he thinks is an interesting post. If winning was as easy as he pretends it is, he would have won a jackpot several times by now and he hasn&#x27;t. so he knows. Use to be posters like pumpi were unique, now a lot more posters are copying his style and coming up with e... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707276">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707235</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707235</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 19:21:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Stack47</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I ve heard over and over and over AND OVER of people saying they trap the winning numbers but in different lines (like Maddog challenge, quick picks, birthday numbers, own picks, etc)....So if this is TRUE why not switch them...<br /><br />The term trap does apply to Maddog&#x27;s Challenge because the idea is to pick 12 numbers and hit or trap the 5 drawn numbers. If someone wants to gamble, they could play all 792 combos or if not they could arrange the 12 numbers into 3 combinations. A 3if5 has 6 combos... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707235">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Stack47</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707088</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707088</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:57:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Spot-UK</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I have used hot/cold numbers before, but the problem is not knowing when a number ceased to be hot or cold; some people suggest any numbers over 6 (or 18?) weeks are no longer relevant.<br /><br />Nowadays, I simply use RNG to throw out a small selection of numbers for each draw, and apply some combinational systems to fit my budget.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Spot-UK</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707067</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1707067</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 16:46:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>a person could had used: Hot Cold as the backbone to switch the numbers and arrange them, could had also use: Even/odd [one ratio], high over low..Example of high/low if the range is 1-54 then 54 divided by 2 = 27 so 1-27 are low numbers and 28-54 are high numbers....</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1706786</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1706786</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 07:26:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Spot-UK</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;ve done exactly that, and came up with a simple system where I take a random selection 12 numbers for 6/49 game, then used a randomizer to produce 18 lines of 6 numbers. Each number is played 9 times.<br /><br />I went further and randomized the other 37 numbers to produce 12 lines of 6, thereby playing each number twice (except for 2 numbers which are played once).<br /><br />Results: 3 consecutive draws with zero hit on a different random selection of 12 numbers each time; no overall win in the first 2 draw... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211/1706786">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Spot-UK</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Heard this Time after Time: If you trap the Jackpot numbers on different lines Why not Switch them</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/217211</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 18:38:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I ve heard over and over and over AND OVER of people saying they trap the winning numbers but in different lines (like Maddog challenge, quick picks, birthday numbers, own picks, etc)....So if this is TRUE why not switch them...<br /><br />Example, if you get a quick pick: you get 5 lines and you know the winning numbers is going to be scattered all over it, start fiddling and switching and weaving You should get the winning numbers in 1 line...<br /><br />You should had won the jackpot a long time ago...</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

