<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>new system - works ok</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/227723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: new system - works ok</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723/1957978</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723/1957978</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jerry80</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>fair point. what i&#x27;m looking for is public opinion about wheels and wheeling systems. i can and have read plenty of marketing hype about wheels. i&#x27;m just trying to figure out which ones are actually worth using. the system i&#x27;m mentioned only reduces the choices some. it still leaves lots of numbers to try to cover. any advice is appreciated.</p>]]></description>
			<category>jerry80</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723/1956670</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723/1956670</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:09:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>When I see a general question like what are the best wheeling systems I always wonder why you didn&#x27;t move your mouse an inch to the left and click Lottery Wheels in the left-hand column.<br /><br />I must admit that it kinda makes me wonder if such a general question was posted only to try and promote the sas system that your friend created</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723/1956448</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723/1956448</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:58:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Coin Toss</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>On the example for the Arizona 5/39 game they are showing 15 numbers to avoid (38.46% of the matrix) and 24 numbers to pick from (61.54% of the matrix.)<br /><br />No big deal or anything sensational there.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Coin Toss</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>new system - works ok</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/227723</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 03:10:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jerry80</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>some friends of mine developed a new lottery number selection system using SAS to eliminate some numbers for pick 5 games. they call it nopicks. i tried it and it works ok. i did win a few 3 of 5 prizes by wheeling on a few days.<br /><br />my question: what are best wheeling systems? i want to use the nopicks system with some optimized wheels rather than full wheels.</p>]]></description>
			<category>jerry80</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

