<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>One Way You Could Make an RNG to follow an Equation Output Course...</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/229129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: One Way You Could Make an RNG to follow an Equation Output Course...</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1991077</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1991077</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:19:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JosephusMinimus</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Pumpi: Is there any evidence anywhere to support the belief the output of an RNG is in any way different than it would have been if the draw had been a dropped set of balls? If there is no evidence to support the belief contained in the countless thousands of individual draws of each type isn&#x27;t a stretch to assume your equation would work on an RNG but not on dropped balls if it worked at all?<br /><br />On the other side, if there is evidence a difference between the product of dropped balls and RNGs e... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1991077">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JosephusMinimus</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1990974</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1990974</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>let me explain it better for last night i was sleepy...<br /><br />When i say proportionality another word you can use to explain is is, CORRESPONDANCE which i think is what a function is in mathematics...my book said, proportionality but another word for it I THINK is correspondance, i think they were trying to be more clear explain it better...</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1990815</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1990815</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:20:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JosephusMinimus</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Good morning Pumpi.<br /><br />If a random number generator of any description was unplugged immediately after the last operation protected to keep it from generating any random numbers until the next draw hours or days later a person knowing enough about the equation might predict the next number to be generated. But if any numbers were generated between one official draw and the next official draw for testing the system would a person who knew the equation but didn&#x27;t know how many times the RNG was te... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129/1990815">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JosephusMinimus</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>One Way You Could Make an RNG to follow an Equation Output Course...</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 10:04:20 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>pumpi76</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>i happen to read one paragraph of my trigonometry book and it began talking about,<br /><br />PROPORTIONALITY...<br /><br />They mention the equation:<br /><br />W = k *wd^2/L<br /><br />This made me think of something...The important thing is not the equation but the proportionality...<br /><br />imagine now that in the 2 i began writing the numbers or exponent of a series [n+3 or n*4.32212 or n+3 - 8 or n+3 - 8a the exponent writing can extend from here to infinity theoretically]...Now imagine that the equation of the RNG was of pro... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229129">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>pumpi76</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

