Wave pattern analysis and lottery draw histories

Reply #76

billybouy — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 23:27:01 GMT

billybouy does not use past history to the extent that you suggest, and if your maths are as good as you suggest you are missing the maths in this it was done by a mathematician years ago the method I use so have another look and tell me what I am using and doing that has you wondering my friend, perhaps it is something that is older than you are and you wont have heard of it

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #75

RJOh — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:33:21 GMT

I believe the math/evidence supports the proposition that all you can accomplish with system play is affect the DISTRIBUTION of your winnings.

Isn't that some of what system players have been saying? No one has yet come up with a system with all the answers, but that's a start.

Reply #74

jimmy4164 — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:08:52 GMT

Sorry billybouy but I don't have time for more analysis of past draws. I believe the math/evidence supports the proposition that all you can accomplish with system play is affect the DISTRIBUTION of your winnings.

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/229947/2056366

Reply #73

billybouy — Fri, 10 Jun 2011 11:50:36 GMT

Here is the PB upload you will see how it finished, the file is not ready for Saturday I may not get one done in time, but it is possible to extract numbers in the same way.

http://www.box.net/shared/1tlnpmi7sc

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #72

billybouy — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 20:49:02 GMT

If you download the files I have put up and filter CJ for the numbers you see in there, study it and let me know If you can see what is happening in what you see, you will find out why I celebrate and I am waiting for some one who can put it together what is going on here so they can celebrate to, as I can't gain anything from doing this Lottery but there are lots of people on here who can, If you can work out what is going on you can convert it to pick three,If you want the bother for 3 numbers... [ More ]

Reply #71

RJOh — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 19:56:51 GMT

Do you too believe that finding 7 games out of 70 across the country with the same 3rd digit on the same day is unusual, and something to celebrate?

No, especially when you're talking about 70 games and only 10 digits.

But then I'm not a pick3 player, I only play pick5 and jackpot games.

Reply #70

Tenaj — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 17:28:28 GMT

Yes to your question Jimmy to whether you can get patterns from years back of data. And it's true numbers run together, follow and come before each other for no reason at all. I call them clusters and followers. I don't do pairs, last digit out, high low, none of those things but I do dates and day of the week. I follow the pattern of the whole number and lottery math. I have data of the same data occuring the same in different years.

OK, I'm going to tell this story again because I've told i... [ More ]

Reply #69

billybouy — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:37:59 GMT

I don't think anyone is celebrating here, we are doing what we do all the time search for questions and give an answer that's what we do in the Lottery Post, along with search for answer.

billybouy...

Reply #68

jimmy4164 — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:42:01 GMT

I don't think there is anything foolish about the question I asked.

...what is unusual about having 7 games out of 70 end up with the same digit in the 3rd position?

It gets at the crux of some of the reasoning used here in selecting Pick-3 numbers.

The question I asked in this thread, believing someone like you or billybuoy would know the answer, was, Is there anyone here that can shed some light on what is being celebrated regarding this post?

I hope it's not necessary for me to... [ More ]

Reply #67

billybouy — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:19:08 GMT

I have put up another file but I don't think I payed enough attention to what I had done, If you cant see the 6 numbers in a group column , please filter 1 in CJ and you will see the numbers as they finnished it will give you ideas of how to get them out.

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #66

billybouy — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:13:52 GMT

I don't do pick three, I only do jackpots like RJOh, I think he does patterns as well along with color coding to pick up the answer and it seems to be the way to go.

billybouy...

Reply #65

RJOh — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 14:36:35 GMT

If you want to know how a pick3 player thinks, then you'll have to start playing pick3. There are some things they don't say even to each other because a pick3 player would know those things and they don't care for non-players asking a bunch of foolish questions. Once you become a pick3 players, you'll blend in and they might open up more.

Reply #64

jimmy4164 — Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:51:43 GMT

Although wave pattern analysis wasn't mentioned in the Pick-3 thread, it's still possible that it might be involved.

Is there anyone here that can shed some light on what is being celebrated regarding this post? I got no response in the Pick-3 Forum; I think they're too busy celebrating.

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/231631/2063820

I'm obviously missing something

Reply #63

billybouy — Wed, 08 Jun 2011 15:11:40 GMT

Here is the UK as well.

http://www.box.net/shared/lcox32sqy4

billybouy...

Reply #62

billybouy — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:50:58 GMT

OK everyone, try this filter 0 on one side and filter 2 on the other, A,B,C, WITH G,H,I, and D,E,F, with J,K,L, reverse your filters and get into the swing of it, and extract the numbers the more you use this the more you will pick up the order to extract the numbers yes the correct one's, try it and find out.

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #61

JosephusMinimus — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:11:15 GMT

billybouy: People are downloading it so you're probably right about them being interested. As for responses, heck, everyone's working his own direction, exploring individual paths trying to find whatever they're after. Same as you are, same as I am.

You're putting your work out where people can use it if they wish to. That's all anyone could ask.

Good luck on your efforts.

Reply #60

billybouy — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 16:01:52 GMT

Hi Joseph some people are downloading this pattern so it is a sign that some like working with the patterns,

trouble is no sensible responses are happening.

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #59

JosephusMinimus — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:15:00 GMT

Feri32: Thanks for the advice. I'm always happy to consider advice given by strangers on the Internet who believe themselves wise enough to tell others how they should spend their time and energies.

Reply #58

feri32 — Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:44:15 GMT

Do not analize!

The mathematical approach of lottery is that each draw is unique.

No matter what numbers were pulled before.

Yes, globally you can examine the pulled numbers, but do not forget, that in a 6 out of 49 games your chances are 1 to 10,068,347,520.

If you compare the draws from 1950, that is - in case of weekly raffles - (2011-1950) * 12 = 732 draws.

Now compare 732 to 10,068,347,520 - it means that you should not waste time with math.

It is pure luck.

Spend the t... [ More ]

Reply #57

billybouy — Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:17:59 GMT

Here we are one for Wednesday, hope you are finding these patterns that I am posting are helpful.

http://www.box.net/shared/1tlnpmi7sc

Good luck,

billybouy...

Reply #56

billybouy — Fri, 03 Jun 2011 10:56:01 GMT

Here you are a big wave from billybouy, try this one, good luck.

http://www.box.net/shared/1tlnpmi7sc

billybouy...

Reply #55

billybouy — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:08:55 GMT

Thanks hope it helps.

billybouy...

Reply #54

jmill1948 — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 21:05:29 GMT

excellent thanks for the post and link

Reply #53

billybouy — Wed, 01 Jun 2011 20:46:28 GMT

Here we are one for Saturday, enjoy just filter what you see.

http://www.box.net/shared/1tlnpmi7sc

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #52

billybouy — Tue, 24 May 2011 07:04:12 GMT

Here we are one for tomorrow Wednesday.

http://www.box.net/shared/1tlnpmi7sc

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #51

billybouy — Mon, 23 May 2011 22:10:21 GMT

Hi Joseph many thanks for the compliments, I would say almost as there is something I am missing, will keep looking.

Regards,

billybouy..

Reply #50

JosephusMinimus — Mon, 23 May 2011 21:55:29 GMT

Sounds cool billybouy. Congratulations on figuring it all out.

Reply #49

billybouy — Mon, 23 May 2011 20:02:03 GMT

The above wave patern returns 6 from 7 in the Power Ball, try it and it will solve your problems.

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #48

billybouy — Mon, 23 May 2011 13:30:10 GMT

Here we are folks another good wave from billybouy, this one is even better.

http://www.box.net/shared/1tlnpmi7sc

billybouy...

Reply #47

billybouy — Fri, 20 May 2011 14:59:19 GMT

Hi Joseph here is a better pattern for you more accurate, try this one everyone.

http://www.box.net/shared/1tlnpmi7sc

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #46

billybouy — Sat, 14 May 2011 20:24:27 GMT

Hi everyone here is patern for you and it works, try it and enjoy.

http://www.box.net/shared/xi2xsi1dxq

Regards,

billybouy...

Reply #45

JosephusMinimus — Sat, 14 May 2011 19:15:06 GMT

Thanks for the reply RL. That might be the explanation.

Reply #44

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Fri, 13 May 2011 18:25:25 GMT

Josephus

I have been doing a little thinking into the time factor and then the idea came to me about the computers

internal clock. My state uses a RNG to select it's numbers and on several occasions I have noticed that

both the P-5 and P-6 numbers were almost the same. I also thought about some of the RNG test that I

had performed over the years looking for times when the RNG produced to like sets. I have found that

when the internal clock or ticks rolls around to the next digit... [ More ]

Reply #43

jimmy4164 — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:46:26 GMT

Joey says, Yours [Jimmy4164's Holy Grail] gives the appearance of an attempt to control what others do, the way others think, and to disrupt and distract attempts by others to discuss what you've decided is unworthy of them.

Before pontificating on your assessment of my motives for posting what I do here, it would behoove you to look back and see what I've clearly stated my motives are. Here are just a few examples:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/219047/1743903 August 16, 20... [ More ]

Reply #42

JosephusMinimus — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:26:43 GMT

Hi Jimmy: I decided to read one of your posts despite the fact I use the block feature to avoid doing it overall. I don't intend to make a habit of it, but I'll do my best to treat this one as the legitimate question you pretend it is.

Jimmy's question: What remains to be done?

Answer: Anything I choose to do within my capacity to do it. Anything other LP members choose to do within their individual capacities to do whatever it might be. Many of us here are pursuing what you refer to as... [ More ]

Reply #41

jimmy4164 — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 06:07:55 GMT

Which might mean it can't be done, as the preachers insist, or it might mean we all just know too much too soon to allow ourselves to look where we know we'd be foolish to look.

At the risk of being labeled provocative again, I must ask [again,] what is it that remains to be done? The last time I questioned RL's ability to outperform mere mortals by a factor of 11 in lotto, he replied with even bigger claims. If there is any lottery player here who would NOT be satisfied with winning $1100 o... [ More ]

Reply #40

garyo1954 — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:12:16 GMT

Jimbooble-looble!!!!

Thirty to forty years ago somebody invented the idea of repetitious phrases, packaged it in a doll called Chatty Cathy and made a mint. You remind me that that idea is not a new concept. Someone posts something you can't comprehend, and you immediately go in to the Chatty Cathy stage, posting the same questions over and over.

You should consider throwing out your old 'To Do List' since no one is answering those.

How about some positive, uplifting posts on the invest... [ More ]

Reply #39

jimmy4164 — Thu, 14 Apr 2011 03:16:31 GMT

Reply #38

JosephusMinimus — Wed, 13 Apr 2011 13:44:47 GMT

Hi RL. Thanks for the reply. The provocations give the appearance of being deliberate, protracted and usually successful. They've applied the Lucy/Football method and discovered the best of us can't resist one more try.

I don't know whether Lucy's mentally ill or not but she's found a weak spot and knows how to exploit it.

A lot of people all over LP are trying to find ways of applying math to lottery draws and some of them seem to succeed well enough to keep them trying. Probably you are... [ More ]

Reply #37

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 20:29:05 GMT

Josephus

Provocation seems to be the culprit here, many times it causes a reaction that leads to many unwanted

post which often have no bearing on the topic. There are many who can't just state some bit of information

that they believe to be pertinent but have to make it personal in some way. This then takes on a life of

it's own and ends up a trashing contest. The thing that gets me is that the same people always seem to

be the catalyst in preaching the same old thing over and ov... [ More ]

Reply #36

JosephusMinimus — Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:02:01 GMT

RL: Those might be helpful but I think I'd hate to see it unless the unwanted junk involved the type of interchanges that lead to posts being deleted and threads shut down and locked. I use the block feature to cut down on the static provided by visionetc and Jimmie, but if I didn't have a paid membershiip I'd just skip over their posts and ignore them.

I don't see the problem to be so much in their posts as in the consequences carried within the responses they provoke. You've had a good thr... [ More ]

Reply #35

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:56:52 GMT

Bobby623

I would agree but it only takes one bad apple to spoil the whole basket. Until the trolls are stopped

not much can be done. Maybe private rooms/threads or giving the person who starts the post the

ability to ban certain members from posting within the thread or deleating unwanted junk. Don't

know if it could be done but one can hope.

RL

Reply #34

bobby623 — Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:57:51 GMT

Don't you guys think it's time for you to put aside your personal animosities

and get back to the question at hand?

Personally, I'd appreciate some constructive comments regarding the role of

'substitution' as it applies to lottery strategies.

If the odds of this or that happening for everything is the general rule,

then we should just mail a check to our state lottery and go watch TV.

If, on the other hand, there is good reason to believe that, despite the odds, there are

w... [ More ]

Reply #33

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Sun, 10 Apr 2011 20:45:21 GMT

Jimmy

Is your name in your book and if so what is your score?

RL

Reply #32

jimmy4164 — Sat, 09 Apr 2011 05:11:36 GMT

No apology required CARBOB. Regardless of any differences we have in number theory, anyone who is willing to admit mistakes scores high in my book

Reply #31

CARBOB — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 17:15:39 GMT

You are correct, I misread the article by Steve Smith, I thought they were in disagreement. My apology.

Reply #30

jimmy4164 — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:40:44 GMT

CARBOB says,

The Spainiard disproves nothing about Benfords law.

I'm surprised you didn't go here http://www.dspguide.com/ch34/8.htm

Please read the physorg article again. The data from the Spaniard National Institute of Statistics shows clearly how certain data follows Benford's Law. If you look at the small diamonds in their graph forming a horizontal line, you will see that THE LOTTERY DOES NOT FOLLOW BENFORD'S LAW!

I followed your link to dspguide and found that they agree... [ More ]

Reply #29

CARBOB — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 09:58:38 GMT

You can see his example of skips ending in leading digit of one, in the Fla mid draw. You can see that a skip with a leading digit of 1 is due.

DATE Time P1 P2 P3 Game Exact Boxed Skip

04/07/11 Mid 1 3 1 1054 131 113 476

04/06/11 Mid 0 5 3 1053 053 035 342

04/05/11 Mid 9 8 3 1052 983 389 87

04/04/11 Mid 9 1 1 1051 911 119 688

04/03/11 Mid 9 4 6 1050 946 469 50

04/02/11 Mid 8 4 9 1049 849 489 25

04/01/11 Mid 1 5 7 1048 157 157 104

03/31/11 Mid 3 2

Reply #28

CARBOB — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 09:38:41 GMT

The Spainiard disproves nothing about Benfords law.

I'm surprised you didn't go here http://www.dspguide.com/ch34/8.htm

Reply #27

jimmy4164 — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 03:58:40 GMT

This post is not meant to disrespect CARBOB. It's understandable why he mentioned Benford's Law when he did, by reference. However, given what research has revealed about Benford's Law applied to lottery draws, I think it is important to point out that Benford's Law does NOT correlate with lottery results!

I'm surprised you would not have clicked back on this and included a mention of it in your reply to CARBOB.

In case the caption above is too faded to read on your monitor, it re... [ More ]

Reply #26

JosephusMinimus — Fri, 08 Apr 2011 00:19:24 GMT

Great link CARBOB. Thanks a bunch.

Reply #25

jimmy4164 — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:44:25 GMT

For full disclosure, you really should mention a more recent response to this:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/218174/1807841

Be sure to take the link once you get there...

--Jimmy4164

Reply #24

CARBOB — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:18:10 GMT

This is one of his posts on skips.

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/148025

Reply #23

JosephusMinimus — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:11:57 GMT

Hi Gary. It does get a bit tiresome after a while. I'll see you where it's further to the horizon and the highway easement measures more distance between the barbed wire.

Reply #22

garyo1954 — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 17:47:06 GMT

Kudos to both of you. And Steve for 'Analysis to Paralysis' which explains a lot. Feel like I've charted the same things 47 different ways and they still have no meaning. LOL Probably could have sidestepped 46 of them if I had paid attention the first time.

You two have infused new ideas starting the process in forward motion again.

Good time for me to sit in the background and work on a few other projects as well.

Reply #21

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 15:29:10 GMT

Josephus

I am taking a break also, I have so much going on right now that as winsum would say analysis to paralysis has

set in. I have missed so much sleep working 20 hours or more a day that even I can't understand what I wrote

here yesterday. I have too many projects going right now but like to keep my browser open and read some of the

post from time to time. I should never attempt to explain things in this state of consciousness. Going to get some

sleep now, maybe it will be b... [ More ]

Reply #20

JosephusMinimus — Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:32:32 GMT

Hi RL: I've got some ideas about this I'm trying to develop on this subject but I've got a lot of distractions here at the moment. Trying to think of them within the context of what you're saying is requiring some distance and pondering anyway. I'll get back to you on it as soon as I have a clearer picture

Reply #19

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:11:18 GMT

Josephus

No problem. I have noticed that much is said about the product of random but very little has been posted

about what makes random, random. Working with digits I have often had times when I choose all correct

digits and had all the numbers but after filtering them down I find several 2 of 5 and maybe a 3 of 5

remaining.

Filters are ticket slayers and they are also indiscriminate. If the skills I have aquired over the years are anything

more then educated guesses then I w... [ More ]

Reply #18

JosephusMinimus — Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:20:33 GMT

Good morning RL: I've read through this post a dozen or more times now and it's been a journey of discovery about the workings of my own mind and thought processes. I'm having a lot of difficulty absorbing and sorting through what it contains because in order to do it I'm having to abandon, at least temporarily, some places I'd arrived in my own thinking and didn't realize until I tried to consider your post and what it means, that I'd fortified them.

The part of what you've said that resonat... [ More ]

Reply #17

CARBOB — Wed, 06 Apr 2011 10:24:49 GMT

Everyone that has ever looked at the skips for any number should have noticed that the highest hitting skip is (0) meaning the number hits more often in the next drawing then any other value

I could be wrong, but I seem to recall a post by Thoth, that mention the fact, a value has a 50% chance of repeating within 5 draws. I will try to find the post and link it here.

Reply #16

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 23:32:40 GMT

Josephus

I think I sent you a F-4 B-6 file, When I take the B-6 patterns and run the draw history I have found

that almost all of these patterns hit within a short time frame with only a few repeats. I found this

interesting because I would think that for this data one could expect that random selection would

produce many repeats. I have been working on many things and have not had the time to give this

the attention needed to test. If as in my basic analysis this hold true then

Reply #15

JosephusMinimus — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:54:49 GMT

I'm thinking this over carefully before I decide what I think about it, or whether I think anything about it. I'm not ignoring the post. I appreciate it.

I'm just considering it from every angle possible and taking some time doing it.

Thanks.

Reply #14

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:43:39 GMT

Jimmy

Thanks for the link. This thread may take on a life of it's own if we can ban togeather and take another look

at the inner workings of random within a closed system. Clusters should not be associated with patterns

in the general sense but more like the DNA of randomness. Everyone that has ever looked at the skips for

any number should have noticed that the highest hitting skip is (0) meaning the number hits more often in

the next drawing then any other value. I have found ve... [ More ]

Reply #13

JosephusMinimus — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:13:40 GMT

Mayhem: I just called up your prediction statistics to try to reconcile this post with the one on the other thread saying the prediction board's a waste of time. I suppose you must have made some money buying tickets based on clusters as opposed to posting them on the prediction board. Makes sense considering your view the prediction board's a waste of time.

Good on you.

Reply #12

mayhem — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 18:00:31 GMT

If you notice a pattern of clusters over time, say all high or all low then the next time you see it you can put money on it, hopefully before the clustering ends. If nothing ever clustered then it would be exponentially harder to guess what type of draw would come next.

Reply #11

JosephusMinimus — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 17:39:13 GMT

It might. But it might also depend on what's awesome about clustering.

Reply #10

mayhem — Sat, 02 Apr 2011 17:52:17 GMT

Clustering is awesome. It gives us a real chance at a strategy to make money. If things were evenly random making money would be even harder.

Reply #9

JosephusMinimus — Sat, 02 Apr 2011 12:03:19 GMT

Lottery administrations, lottery cops and those suspicious people who frequently express the opinion various lottery draws are being diddled with ought to be able to confirm their suspicions or ease their doubts just by looking at the draw histories. If a draw, or series of draws breaks out of the historical pattern of the draws there should probably be alarm bells ringing somewhere.

Reply #8

JosephusMinimus — Sat, 02 Apr 2011 11:00:46 GMT

ZDOX11: I went back and checked some of what you posted here and haven't found any discrepancies with it, though I haven't been thorough enough to call it a 'test'.

Where you and I differ is in your attributing it to RNG vs ball drops.

It seems to me you are approaching the issue using adjacent state rules, for instance, without examining a wide range of the [im]possibilities involved in what the adjacent state rule actually implies.

Thanks for the post. I hadn't been aware such matters... [ More ]

Reply #7

jimmy4164 — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:24:50 GMT

This might be of interest here...

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/more_or_less/3396937.stm

Reply #6

JosephusMinimus — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:46:07 GMT

The QuickPick Relegionaires all know without having to examine what they know because they know it so thoroughly what is worth examining and what isn't. But it's all a matter of degree. These forums are full of people who want to win lotteries and believe they can win lotteries using systems, putting them into a segment of the population outside the widely held beliefs of science, math and the lottery administrations.

But but having stepped over the fence and entered forbidden territory of wh... [ More ]

Reply #5

JosephusMinimus — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:01:19 GMT

Mayem: If there's no similar pattern on ball machines you might be correct. If you are interested you might have a look at the multi-state jackpot games in the same way as this, or pick a ball game versus a RNG game of any state you care to. If the patterns persist but the sequence of dates changes you might be led to conclude it isn't a product of RNG programming.

Thanks for the reply.

Reply #4

JosephusMinimus — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 10:59:36 GMT

Thanks for the reply ZDOX. I'll have to think about your post a while.

Reply #3

mayhem — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 06:01:43 GMT

Ha. When I first got here I asked the question: Shouldn't we want MORE computerized lottery draws . The premise being that computers are synthetic and more likely to give observable patterns than a ball machine would. Your observations would seem to make this a valid statement.

Reply #2

ZDOX11 — Fri, 01 Apr 2011 02:33:49 GMT

pick four numbers only return on certain dates. take dc for example. any number which comes out will have come on the same

day before or day after it has come in prior years in either dc or any state dc is adjacent to such as md, va, or wv. many numbers

return on the exact day time and time again. the only exception is quads. when you start through todds database you will find

that that is the case for each number. the problem is that the database only goes back to 2004 since it looses

Reply #1

JosephusMinimus — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:19:28 GMT

By wave patterns in lottery histories I'm referring partially to those similar to the one below. It's a series of Pick 3 day and night draws, as I've explained previously on other threads:

--11---1---xx2/7/2011

-----111---xx2/7/2011

--1-111----xx2/8/2011

--1--11----xx2/8/2011

------11-2-xx2/9/2011

----2----1-xx2/9/2011

--2--------xx2/10/2011

--1-2------xx2/10/2011

--1-1----2-xx2/11/2011

---1----2--xx2/11/2011

--11-1---1-xx2/12/2011

---1---1-1-xx2/12/2011... [ More ]

Wave pattern analysis and lottery draw histories

JosephusMinimus — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:24:10 GMT

Are any of you aware of any attempts to superimpose wave pattern analysis of any sort of lottery draw histories? If so can you provide a link?

I'd be interested to know the methods used and whether comparisons were made to terrestrial wave patterns, earth magnetic or gravitational field patterns, Rossby wave patterns or any others.

In fact I'd be interested in reading any discussion of wave pattern analysis and lottery draw histories, other than bland statements preemptively declaring no r... [ More ]