How are you creating your lotto system ?

Reply #17

Lucky Loser — Sat, 15 Oct 2011 02:40:30 GMT

When you have some time, go over to LOTTERY DISCUSSIONS and see my reply to the topic Any system can win sometimes but no system can win all the time . I actually disagree with there not being an approach to win consistently but, there are sound reasons which support my thoughts as well. There are more factors than just simply playing numbers.

Reply #16

JKING — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:36:31 GMT

Hi

Thanks for your comments. I don't play p3, but agree with your comments as being a great starting point.

Consider this though....

How many many posts have there been at the LP for P3 methods?

How much manpower and talent have gone into creating those systems and posts?

How many of those posters have basically said, mine is the winning system?

And yet there is no consensus by the majority that there is one generally approved winning system. That's not to say that there... [ More ]

Reply #15

Lucky Loser — Fri, 14 Oct 2011 04:20:35 GMT

Hello JKING. I will try and keep this as short and brief as possible. First and foremost, any and all worthwhile approaches to the pick games will be based around the (3) absolute things that numbers must do. One, they must either odd or even. Two, they must be high, low, or mid-range on the numerical scale. These are the ONLY things that numbers can do and no number can do all three simultaneously. This is where anyone should begin to develop their system for combining numbers as everything els... [ More ]

Reply #14

RJOh — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:26:11 GMT

You should have expected someone to take offense at any comments that weren't congratulatory even if you never used or plan to use their system. Systems posted at LP may give others ideas for designing their own system but are seldom of any use to anyone other than their designers because of their uniqueness.

I too have a lottery system I've developed over the years which I posted a year ago. I continue to make changes to it and have yet to win a jackpot or more than I spend but I keep trying... [ More ]

Reply #13

lakerben — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:09:01 GMT

Don't worry about it . You made your point.

peace

Reply #12

JKING — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 16:41:25 GMT

Hi,

All I am doing is giving a different point of view. Nothing more. I'm sorry if you view it as a personnal attack. Nothing could be farther from the truth. By the way, I don't play P3, my systems are different than anything that is posted here, and my intent is to enhance other peoples systems rather than to dimish them. Then again, I guess we all have a pearch that we sit on. *L*

Best of luck.

Reply #11

lakerben — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:17:45 GMT

A second look? Well, I have spent many hours of my free time working on developing math formulas or techniques that will help myself and members on this board. These have proven to work . Since you have doubts, then pull up the NM p3 history and backtest for yourself if you are able to. These methods have few numbers that prove to be inexpensive to play with instead of large pool of numbers. On the contrary, I have a few programs that can't replicate a winner when backtesting as good as my metho... [ More ]

Reply #10

Teamprofit — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 05:03:39 GMT

The chart is just the midday draw and evening draws with the hot/cold method with a twist I created. I just highlighted the numbers that came out for each draw.

The chart helps me see the movement of the numbers as each draw goes by...I hit a few times with it(about 3 times out of 5 tries) because the patterns are really good at repeating, but each time I used the information differently. Trying different things to see what works best.

It was not until about three days ago that I thought o... [ More ]

Reply #9

lakerben — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:04:07 GMT

I'm going for the MM and powerball bigger wins like everyone else, and then I'll probably take off and travel. I've tracked like you said and just missed the big one by one number in Texas back in the 90's. MY methods are different than most and are based on math instead of churning out large groups of numbers. I let the calculator do the work. Its gambling and nothing is a sure thing. Some people here in town bet the ponies, I bet the lotto. However, when /if I win big I'm going to the track an... [ More ]

Reply #8

JKING — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 03:39:38 GMT

Hi,

Thanks for the responses. *S*

When I started this post, the intent was for people to step back for a second look at what they were doing and how they are doing it. It is easy to get locked into a mindset.

Cajun - I think we all would like to see more if what you do if you are willing. I've had several wins also, but am a long way from being able to make a living from it. And you?

Teamprofit - Thanks for the compliment. I agree with alot of what you are saying. Especially the... [ More ]

Reply #7

LANTERN — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 02:56:40 GMT

On any drawing one ball probably doesn't have much to do with any other ball that came out or that didn't and the balls that came out or that didn't on a drawing might not have much to do with those from any other drawing past or future yet to come.

It seems to me that the only thing that relates or that ties them are statistics.

One ball is about the same as any other one, so What statistics? We have to give the ball characteristics as they don't seem to have any, we give them numbers and... [ More ]

Reply #6

lakerben — Wed, 12 Oct 2011 01:39:17 GMT

This chart kind of resembles a majic or hall chart. Is it working for you and are you hitting with it

Reply #5

Teamprofit — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:56:19 GMT

Here is the picture I was talking about.....

The information is for FL midday(column 1) and FL Evening(column 2)

Then Column 3-12 are the digits 0-9

Green is the Midday draw

Light Blue is the Evening draw

Yellow means the draw had a common number

I manipulate the order the numbers appear. But there are facts involved

The image explains what I mean....

Reply #4

lakerben — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:04:33 GMT

Sometimes its what people perceive that wins. I've bought state of the art software from several vendors and most just give endless charts,graphs and tons of numbers, but hardly any winners. I think a lot of the systems in the lottery market started out from ideas and trial and error. Not every sytem works for every state. If there is a rigid structure then there is no room for improvement. I think these systems are great and this is what this site is all about! And, I agree with CW4 to go outsi... [ More ]

Reply #3

Teamprofit — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:57:39 GMT

Great Topic!!!

I've created different systems some use more logic and others are just me trying to be creative.

I believe there is more value in the system that includes facts, because the lottery games maybe random but that random still has it's own set of rules that it follows.

There isn't one set of number possibilities, it's more like a group of numbers...atleast that is what I think.

While I look for creating a better system, I move in different directions looking at other ideas... [ More ]

Reply #2

bootleg233 — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:37:04 GMT

And Kudos to you Cajun!!!! Looking forward to being one of the many winners with the help of any of your systems!!! Patiently waiting! Da Boot........

Reply #1

CajunWin4 — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:29:17 GMT

My system works on all game formats ...... It's that simple !!! I've had many wins ... I noticed that to many on LP are using the same ideas or principles for their sysytems . It was time to go outside the Normal Box of Lottery game systems .

CW4

How are you creating your lotto system ?

JKING — Tue, 11 Oct 2011 02:15:37 GMT

Are you creating your lottery system based on how you think it should work or what wins?

Are you creating your lottery system in your own image?

Are you creating your lottery system on your perceptions rather than facts?

Are you looking at only one point of view to determine the structure of a winning system?

In the end, does your system require that your final lottery pick is determined on how you feel rather than just the pure facts?

I only bring up these questions, because I so... [ More ]