<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Dice vs Lottery Games: Is it Fair to Compare 1-1 vs 1-2-3-4 . . . ?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/243764" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Dice vs Lottery Games: Is it Fair to Compare 1-1 vs 1-2-3-4 . . . ?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #16</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2455140</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2455140</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 05:11:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>KY Floyd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>all lottery combinations will be picked the same number of times over a long period of time<br /><br />It sounds logical, but that&#x27;s not what happens. Each combination has the same chance of being drawn, regardless of what has happened previously. Suppose the game has gone on long enough that 1% of the combinations have already won. Those combinations are just as likely to be drawn in the future as any of the 99% that haven&#x27;t been drawn, so in the next 1000 drawings we can expect that about 1% will com... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2455140">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>KY Floyd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #15</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454794</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454794</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 22:58:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BlueDuck</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>KY Floyd:<br /><br />Thanks for well written reply. Please excuse my Invincible Stupidity.<br /><br />One the one hand, all lottery combinations will be picked the same number of times over a long period of time. I am inclined to believe this idea, it sounds logical.<br /><br />On the other hand, combinations that add up to 150 (in a 6/49 lottery) will hit more often because there are more of them. My response is, So? So what?? (No sarcasm implied.)<br /><br />How can both statements be true at the same time? Will combinat... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454794">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BlueDuck</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #14</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454440</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454440</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 16:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BlueDuck</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>SergeM:<br /><br />You give me a lot to chew on in your post. If that euphemism didn&#x27;t translate, I want to say: you give me much to ponder.<br /><br />Thanks,<br /><br />BlueDuck</p>]]></description>
			<category>BlueDuck</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #13</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454051</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454051</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 05:43:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>KY Floyd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>As others have said, the answer to the first question is yes.<br /><br />I&#x27;d say the second question is a completely different question because of the way you asked it. 7 and 150 aren&#x27;t specific results, and can be reached in multiple ways. Even if you view 1+1 and 6+6 as sums, they can only be acheived by rolling one specific combination. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 is a specific result, and is every bit as likely as any of the specific results that add up to 150.<br /><br />With the dice you can bet on the sum and it wo... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454051">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>KY Floyd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #12</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454033</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2454033</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 04:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BlueDuck</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Rdgrnr,<br /><br />If only half think I&#x27;m nuts, then must be doing pretty good.<br /><br />BlueDuck</p>]]></description>
			<category>BlueDuck</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453987</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453987</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:53:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BlueDuck</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Savagegoose:<br /><br />Thanks for reply. I can understand why 7s show up more often in Dice, because there are six ways, but there is only one way to make the winning combination in a Lottery. Not 5 ways not 150 ways, just one way. Looking for a convincing solution.<br /><br />BlueDuck</p>]]></description>
			<category>BlueDuck</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453965</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453965</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:38:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rdgrnr</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>You&#x27;re welcome, BlueDuck.<br /><br />All I can tell you is that whatever theory you decide on, there will be a few who agree and a few who will say you&#x27;re nuts and both sides will cite facts and figures.<br /><br />Me?<br /><br />I&#x27;ll just drink a big ol&#x27; glass o&#x27; whiskey.<br /><br />Cuz that&#x27;s what I always do.<br /><br />Good luck</p>]]></description>
			<category>rdgrnr</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453946</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453946</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 03:15:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BlueDuck</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rdgrnr:<br /><br />I&#x27;m scratching my head over this problem and my computer got bumped out before I was done so will try it again a little bit latter. Thanks for reply.<br /><br />I&#x27;m not convinced it works if all those combinations in the pick three, or other lottery, get picked an equal amount over time.<br /><br />BlueDuck</p>]]></description>
			<category>BlueDuck</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453865</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453865</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 01:36:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BlueDuck</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Haymaker,<br /><br />...... that&#x27;s what I&#x27;m trying to figure out for myself, if it works or not. You can find Sums Charts by Googling Most Probable Range of Sums .<br /><br />BlueDuck</p>]]></description>
			<category>BlueDuck</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453753</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453753</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 00:01:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SergeM</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Sum-table for eyes of two six faced dices:<br /><br />d+d 1 2 3 4 5 6<br /><br />1 2 3 4 5 6 7<br /><br />2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br /><br />3 4 5 6 7 8 9<br /><br />4 5 6 7 8 9 10<br /><br />5 6 7 8 9 10 11<br /><br />6 7 8 9 10 11 12<br /><br />6x6=36<br /><br />Sums Count Graph<br /><br />2 1 l<br /><br />3 2 ll<br /><br />4 3 lll<br /><br />5 4 llll<br /><br />6 5 lllll<br /><br />7 6 llllll<br /><br />8 5 lllll<br /><br />9 4 llll<br /><br />10 3 lll<br /><br />11 2 ll<br /><br />12 1 l</p>]]></description>
			<category>SergeM</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453536</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453536</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:29:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SergeM</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In combinations the order does not matter.<br /><br />For one dice the average is 3.5! You can&#x27;t get that one! I hope to have helped you to some insight to the stupidity of mathematics!<br /><br />For 1 to 49, the average is 25. ...<br /><br />Every combination has the same chance. It is only that you filter or count the combinations by some criteria.<br /><br />Generally, I don&#x27;t care about sums. You can also order the combinations where the first one is 1 to 6, the second one is 1 to 5 with 7, and so on.<br /><br />I put this in... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453536">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>SergeM</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453489</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453489</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:33:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rdgrnr</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Pick 3 Sum Chart<br /><br />0 - 000<br /><br />1- 001<br /><br />2 - 002, 011<br /><br />3 - 003, 012, 111<br /><br />4 - 004, 013, 022, 112<br /><br />5 - 005, 014, 023, 113, 122<br /><br />6 - 006, 015, 024, 033, 114, 123, 222<br /><br />7 - 007, 016, 025, 034, 115, 124, 133, 223<br /><br />8 - 008, 017, 026, 035, 044, 116, 125, 134, 224, 233<br /><br />9 - 009, 018, 027, 036, 045, 117, 126, 135, 144, 225, 234, 333<br /><br />10 - 019, 028, 037, 046, 055, 118, 127, 136, 145, 226, 235, 244, 334<br /><br />11 - 029, 038, 047, 056, 119, 128, 137, 146, 155, 227, 236, 245, 335,</p>]]></description>
			<category>rdgrnr</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453454</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453454</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:15:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>haymaker</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>never thought of adding up my #s,i&#x27;ll have to try this.<br /><br />does this also work w/ a 6/40 game like cash 5</p>]]></description>
			<category>haymaker</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453435</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453435</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:05:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>savagegoose</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>yeah the 150 is the most common sum, just like 7 is the most common sum on the dice. he confueses the question by mentioning 1 2 3 4 5 6 , if he wants to bee at cross purposes, he should mention all the results that sum upto 150,<br /><br />i wont do the math , but on dice there are 6 results in 36, that sum to 7, and only 1 reuslt that sums to 2,<br /><br />on lotoo its similar, so many sums that add to 150, and onlt 1 sum that adds to 21.<br /><br />try graphing the sums</p>]]></description>
			<category>savagegoose</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453422</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453422</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>haymaker</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>W/ the dice,the 7 shows the most often is because it has the most possible ways of happening.<br /><br />the 150 i have not a clue if can be compaired .</p>]]></description>
			<category>haymaker</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453417</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764/2453417</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:55:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>savagegoose</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>yes</p>]]></description>
			<category>savagegoose</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dice vs Lottery Games: Is it Fair to Compare 1-1 vs 1-2-3-4 . . . ?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/243764</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:49:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BlueDuck</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Is the reason why 7s show up most often in Dice, the same reason why 150 shows up most often as the Most Probable Sum in a 6/49 Lottery Game?<br /><br />or to ask the question another way,<br /><br />Is the reason why rolling a 1-1 or 6-6 infrequent for the same reason as why a draw of 1-2-3-4-5-6 or 44-45-46-47-48-49 is infrequent in Lottery?<br /><br />Still trying to get my head around this one. Your insights appreciated.</p>]]></description>
			<category>BlueDuck</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

