<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Lottery number generators</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/244440</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/244440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Lottery number generators</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Lottery number generators</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/244440</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/244440</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 13:20:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Artist77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Anyone ever try numbers from a certain website (I know we can&#x27;t post links) that claims using atmospheric noise is better than the pseudo-random number algorithms used in computer programs? I would be curious as to the results. I will try this week and see what happens.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Artist77</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

