Win Lotto Systems by William Foster

Reply #29

in2play — Wed, 18 Apr 2012 13:44:36 GMT

Yeah, i know of The professor's systems. I've been using winlottosystems for almost 3 years in my lottery agency, and yes, they do focus on winning the smaller prizes more often. They do. And his stuff doesn't go into all the silly hot and cold numbers and other stupid good luck charms that many people get into. He just tells it liek it is.

Ben

Reply #28

RJOh — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:40:17 GMT

I've seen a 163 lines 6/49 wheels with a match3 guarantee on several websites for free. Sounds like some the package they're selling can be gotten free if one is willing to spend the time looking for it. In Ohio a match3 pays $2 but that wheel does give you 163 chances to win a jackpot for $161.

Reply #27

RJOh — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:32:10 GMT

Her travel articles aren't the only old things on her website, I've read complaints of LP members about some of her old DOS programs not being updated to run on Windows 7.

Reply #26

whit — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:44:54 GMT

Yes, GH is a sweetie, and her old travel articles make good reading, too.

Reply #25

whit — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 09:43:34 GMT

Good points, BobP, thanks for the insights...

Reply #24

LottoBoner — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:55:22 GMT

thats a good point...bob...

he also comes off arrogant...while gail howard is always a sweetie...and helpful...

LMG is like a lottery bible...i take it whenever i go out of town

Reply #23

BobP — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:40:39 GMT

About once a month I get an email from the Lottery Guy touting a new system or one of the same old he's pushing, I write back he should test it himself and let us know his wins and loses, never a reply.

As for Professor Foster's Winlottosystems that's some long story squeeze page. By the time the victim reaches the bottom they are numb and half blind. If you do make it to the bottom click on the affiliate link where you will learn the Lottery Guy and anyone else for that matter can make $3... [ More ]

Reply #22

RJOh — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 05:03:22 GMT

I've since checked out Professor Foster's Winlottosystems and it's not what it's cracked up to be. The ebook is good, and the software does what it is supposed to do, but you have to play a lot of numbers in the hopes of hitting even a small win...

Thanks for the review of Winlottosystem. Sounds like while it does what it's suppose to do, Lotto Guy didn't tell the whole story.

Reply #21

Stack47 — Mon, 16 Apr 2012 01:34:40 GMT

That very same draw when Brad won the jackpot, hundreds of thousands of Powerball tickets would have been bought by people doing similar analysis to him.

If that is true, why does the PB site say 70% to 80% of all ticket purchases are QPs ?

I'm not saying that Brad Duke wasn't extraordiarily lucky and hadn't he won, we would never hear how he played. The same is true of the WVA friends that played the same five numbers 7 times using Powerplay; we'll never read how many other players do th... [ More ]

Reply #20

whit — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 18:02:09 GMT

I've read LMG over the years and each time I discover something new. It is kind of a lottery bible to many. I also have GH's Advantage Plus software. Her stuff is useful and informative, but there is so much info to digest that it can be confusing at times.

Anyway, I've since checked out Professor Foster's Winlottosystems and it's not what it's cracked up to be. The ebook is good, and the software does what it is supposed to do, but you have to play a lot of numbers in the hopes of hitti... [ More ]

Reply #19

whit — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:55:03 GMT

I agree, LP is a great resource for lottery players - probably the best there is

Reply #18

RJOh — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:19:56 GMT

Your remarks in spite of knowing nothing about me convinces me even more of my wisdom of refusing your offer.

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245012/2493015

I could just tell something wasn't right with you.

Reply #17

LottoBoner — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:55:12 GMT

RJoH is not a good person to ask because he has never read the LMG. He uses darts on a wall...his aim is quite random

Reply #16

RJOh — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:50:04 GMT

Playing lottery games is entertaining for me like playing any other games. I enjoy strategizing and picking numbers to play for the next drawing so I don't play the pick3 and pick4 games because their daily multiple drawings don't give me time to think about what to play before the next drawing, besides that's a lot of data to track. I prefer the jackpot games with a couple of days between drawings.

I am developing my own system but it's constantly evolving as I think of newer and better stra... [ More ]

Reply #15

CajunWin4 — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 01:04:52 GMT

Don't waste your time on any systems .. All you will ever need is here on Lotto Post

Reply #14

whit — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:44:01 GMT

Thanks everyone who responded to this thread.

No, I'm not convienced about the Lottery Guy or some of the others who claim to have found a decent system for winning. Everybody has their own methods of playing, and own reasons for choosing one system over another.

What's your method of playing the Pick 5 or Cash 5 games, Rjoh, or have you invented your own? Or do you only play the Pick 3 and 4?

I'm open to learning any new system or technique that might bring me closer to winni... [ More ]

Reply #13

aquariuslottery — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:20:29 GMT

I agree.

For any numeric lottery, only predictions based on actual numbers make any sense.

All these lotteries exhibit certain patterns and finding and exploiting these paterns

is the only logical way to win. Since these patterns constantly fluctuate and change

finding the ones that win currently is a must. Anything else just does not make much

sense.

Beware of any system that does not specify how it picks future numbers. There are

no magic formulas except for what happened

Reply #12

LottoBoner — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:18:36 GMT

The Reality Check

The important thing to learn from Brad s story, is this.

Brad Duke won the Powerball because he was snip lucky. One of the hundreds(?) of tickets he bought for that draw just happened to be the winning combination.

Now he may believe that combination was more likely to come up. But that doesn t make it true.

Remember: if the lottery was preditable in this way, it would not be random. And that would put the well paid Powerball Execs in a whole heap of legal trouble i... [ More ]

Reply #11

LottoBoner — Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:13:21 GMT

FREE! The 'Forgotten' Lottery Tips To Boost Your Chances Of Winning By Up To 50 Times, Plus A Real Example Of Exactly How To Do It...

i dont really know if there are forgetten lottery tips...

just insider information that is not analyzed well....

if i know the hit count in 100 games... and you do not, then i have insider information

the data is known by all but utilized properly by a few...

me personally dont like it when to get free lottery tips...i have to enter in m... [ More ]

Reply #10

Stack47 — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:14:14 GMT

Oddly enough it was on the Lottery Guy's web site where I found Brad Duke's CNN interview. Lottery Guy even takes credit for understanding the system Duke used even though he only had the same info as everyone else.

Reply #9

RJOh — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 19:15:27 GMT

One can only afford so many affiliates, what is really needed are paying suckers customers. When the affiliates slots are filled then affiliates have to search out other products to push and that's probably what the Lottery Guy did. He only trash the ones he's not pushing.

Sounds like this Lottery Guy has convinced you he's a stand-up creditable guy who speaks only the truth. So when you buy the software he's pushing and try it, let the rest of us know how well it works.

Reply #8

LottoBoner — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 18:52:05 GMT

if they dont think patterns exist then they are wrong...

i track patterns so i know other wise...

The lottery is not completely random.

The lottery is a random walk

They are very different...but similar

Look up random on wiki...

then look up random walk...

the whole point of predicting lottery results is predicting the random walk of the matrix...

that is easiest achieved by using patterns and actively tracking them.

and let me tell you its not easy...but it is possib... [ More ]

Reply #7

whit — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 22:51:20 GMT

Perhaps trash is too strong a word. The Lottery Guy simply believes that most lottery systems are really scams, GH and Ken Silver and many others included. Winlottosystems offers some good information about playing the lottery, and the Professor (and The Lottery Guy also) do not believe in tracking past lotto results or in any sort of patterns. The lottery is completely random to them, and it's a waste of time and money to think otherwise...

Reply #6

LottoBoner — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:56:40 GMT

if you read LMG gail howard says its alway better and easier to play the low odds games...

i also came across a website...where there is a lot of trash talking...its a big turnoff...i dont understand that kind of marketing.

Reply #5

whit — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:51:41 GMT

Yes, you could be right. The Lottery Guy may be an affiliate, and gets a percentage of every copy sold.

But I wonder why he's not an affiliate for Gail Howard or some of the other people who he bashes? He would make more from them than by promoting Winlottosystems...

Reply #4

RJOh — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:44:44 GMT

Sounds like this Lottery Guy and the Professor may be in business together, at least they are on the same page about his software.

Reply #3

whit — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:23:10 GMT

I didn't get it in the mail, I found it online through The Lottery Guy's website. He trashes Gail Howard, Ken Silver, and all the others, but gives the Professor props. The Professor's idea is to try and win small games first on your way to winning the jackpot. Hitting 3, 4 or 5 numbers is easier to do than hitting the Big One...

Reply #2

RJOh — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:15:41 GMT

There are enough lottery systems around that you could try a new one every week and only cover a few of them in as many years so you shouldn't be surprised if no one has ever tried or heard of it.

Reply #1

flossdog — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:50:53 GMT

If you got it in the mail, it's probably a scam and no such Prof Foster.

Win Lotto Systems by William Foster

whit — Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:22:32 GMT

Hello All...

I tried using the Search Function to find out something about Win Lotto Systems by Professor William Foster, but have been unable to find anything. Has anyone tried his system, and what do you think of it