<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Do lottery software really works?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/245140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Do lottery software really works?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499766</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499766</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>skio</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>True</p>]]></description>
			<category>skio</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499635</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499635</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:18:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>aquariuslottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I also don&#x27;t understand why people use complicated numerical acrobatics to select future numbers<br /><br />(PI and relatives being a good example) while there are simple and reliable computations available<br /><br />to anybody. I use frequency charts like hot, cold, repetitive, overdue, due to hit etc. and they provide<br /><br />a good picture of what&#x27;s currently happening in the lottery, what are the trends and what direction<br /><br />they are going. How many times in our history it was proven over and over again that si... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499635">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>aquariuslottery</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499013</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499013</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:06:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lucky Loser</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is, Whoa as I just browsed through a thread containing some information about PI and how it applies to Pick 3. For years, Pick 3 has simply boiled down to (3) positions which contain numbers ranging from (0-9). Then, (5) of each of those are (Odd) while the other (5) are Even numbers...and thus form combinations of Odd-Odd-Even, Even-Even-Odd, Even-Odd-Odd, Odd-Even-Even, Odd-Even-Odd, Even-Odd-Even, Str8 Even, and Str8 Odd...that&#x27;s it.<br /><br />I&#x27;m just having a really hard time underst... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2499013">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lucky Loser</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498775</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498775</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Lucky Loser</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>RJOh, commercial lottery software is only a product of the original designer&#x27;s perceived method of approach to the game, okay. This is all it can be because every player see&#x27;s something different in terms of their overall approach and, thus, there is no one system fits all. What you conceive as a winning approach is more than likely not incorporated into a commercial system. Then again, it just might be and this is where most players either love or hate the software they&#x27;ve purchased. In turn, t... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498775">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Lucky Loser</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498532</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498532</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 08:15:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>time*treat</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>RL stole my reply ... and improved it.</p>]]></description>
			<category>time*treat</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498426</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498426</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:12:47 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>aquariuslottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I believe that lottery software, in order to be useful for playing, should do 3 things:<br /><br />1) Offer several prediction methods with clear explanation how each method selects<br /><br />the numbers. Personally, I would not use anything that makes hidden predictions.<br /><br />2) Offer a selection of wheels for playing. Every numeric lottery can have wheels.<br /><br />They significantly improve chances of winning - I&#x27;ve seen it in action in such different<br /><br />lotteries as Lotto 649 and Pick 3. For me - no wheels, no pla... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2498426">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>aquariuslottery</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497545</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497545</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:34:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SergeM</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I am always surprised how many English mistakes are done in the posts.<br /><br />Do lottery software really works?<br /><br />Personally I like to know what the software does.<br /><br />If the program returns statistics, there is nothing wrong with it,<br /><br />unless the output wrong.<br /><br />When a program proposes a choice of numbers, you can reject or keep that selection.</p>]]></description>
			<category>SergeM</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497312</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497312</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RL-RANDOMLOGIC</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>RJOh<br /><br />The best has to be one that you wrote yourself. This way you can control how it picks the lines.<br /><br />Some people have the idea that it does not make any difference how the numbers are selected,<br /><br />because they all have the same odds of showing. QP&#x27;s are, in my opinion the very worst way to<br /><br />play and I know many will dissagree. What works for me may not work well for others and vice<br /><br />versa. Having some fun playing is a must regardless of what one uses even if it&#x27;s pen and paper.<br /><br />Som... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497312">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>RL-RANDOMLOGIC</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497138</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497138</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:29:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Talisman</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Lottery software is most like a scam, it&#x27;s exactly the same as using QP&#x27;s, making your own random numbers, or playing different sets of numbers. Because every number has an equal chance of coming up.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Talisman</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497131</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497131</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 05:14:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>aquariuslottery</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would use only software that predicts winning numbers; otherwise I don&#x27;t see a purpose in using such software.<br /><br />If the software does predict numbers it should also do 3 other things:<br /><br />1) Explain how it selects the numbers, so I can see if there is logic behind it (e.g. if they use a random numbers selection<br /><br />I don&#x27;t think I would need such a software, probably I can do as good drawing from my hat).<br /><br />2) If the software uses some selection method based on stats it should also allow bactr... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140/2497131">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>aquariuslottery</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Do lottery software really works?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/245140</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 19:07:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Most lottery software have a disclaimer that says it&#x27;s for entertainment only so when players ask me do lottery software really work I don&#x27;t know if they are asking is it really entertaining or does it pick winning lottery numbers.<br /><br />All I can say if your lottery software doesn&#x27;t make trying to win a lottery entertaining then it doesn&#x27;t work.</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

