is anyone making an income from lottery

Reply #629

Stack47 — Fri, 17 May 2013 04:11:49 GMT

Looking back, the thread starter made the first post and never posted again. Maybe his question wasn't for speculation and discussion, but they just wanted to hear from someone who is making an income from lottery. With all the paranoia about lottery officials monitoring this site, csample76 may never know.

Reply #628

onlymoney — Tue, 14 May 2013 17:07:54 GMT

I don't understand the question.

Reply #627

helpmewin — Tue, 14 May 2013 16:49:32 GMT

is this you or something else

Reply #626

onlymoney — Tue, 14 May 2013 14:34:21 GMT

I know you're just joking, but months ago I really did contact a person who had the same name as Peter St. Pierre in NH, but he claimed he had no clue what I was talking about. He was rather nice on the phone and I thanked him for his time and hung up.

Either it was really him and he was playing dumb, or he truly wasn't the Pierre I was looking for. What a shame.

Reply #625

SkyLine69 — Tue, 14 May 2013 11:43:22 GMT

Okay, back on task. Lol. I decided to track down this several time over pick 4 winner from NH. It took me quite a few Internet pages and links but I did get through to Mr. Peter Pierre along with 2 other frequent winners. The two others buy QP once a month. 20 day, 20 night and pray like you know what. Now, Mr. Pierre HAS a system using MATH to win thousands of dollars. I asked his secret. His reply......none of your f-ing Buisness and hung up. Lol. I called his cell phone he was pissed at me. O... [ More ]

Reply #624

jimmy4164 — Tue, 14 May 2013 05:38:08 GMT

Stack47 says,

You must have missed the posts where Ronnie and I were discussing the reason you keep saying there is no winning system . We believe it's because you want someone to post a winning system so you can recoup some of your huge gambling losses. Do you believe a pick-3 system that had some success will be enough to help you recoup some of your losses

Reply #623

Stack47 — Tue, 14 May 2013 04:44:53 GMT

I had students in the past who were unable to grasp the course material

That's easy to understand because as a baseball coach, you told your players to hold the wrong end of the bat and to run the bases clockwise.

And apparently you are not even going to provide the Pick-3 players with a convoluted and pitifully evasive attempt to explain away your claims of funding investments with Pick-3 winnings.

You must have missed the posts where Ronnie and I were discussing the reason you keep... [ More ]

Reply #622

Stack47 — Tue, 14 May 2013 04:21:12 GMT

I can understand being critical of a system when it's multiplying the last drawn pick-3 number by PI and saying the next drawing numbers are somewhere in the million digits behind the decimal point, but Jimmy is arguing with us because we simply know it's possible to win on a few thousand on a pick-3 number or win a multi-million jackpot by picking our own numbers.

Reply #621

Stack47 — Tue, 14 May 2013 04:18:39 GMT

Is there no end to the convoluted twisting of the subject matter? His self imposed web of scrambled logic is a boondoggle of the mind.

That's the problem for the people who suffer from Delusions of Grandeur; every topic is their's to change whenever they choose, they are always right, and oblivious to the people pointing and laughing at them as if they are a circus clown.

Reply #620

jimmy4164 — Tue, 14 May 2013 03:58:38 GMT

Stack47,

For over 2 years I have tried reasoning with you, cajoling you, and occasionally tricking you, in an effort to help you understand how probability and statistics relate to the lottery. Why? Because I thought there was a chance you might eventually emerge from the fog and understand. However, when you ask a question like this:

If as you say the house edge effects every player the same, why don't your heros Catlin and Blue Jay make the same challenge on the next 100 outcomes? ........ [ More ]

Reply #619

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 23:35:09 GMT

I think your spot on Stack. I'm sure its very painful for Jammy to try and grasp the concept of enjoying lottery play. As far as I'm concerned the guy in AZ that won the last $200+ PB jackpot found a winning system when he walked in the store and said I would like $10. worth please . This guy had predetermined exactly what he wanted and even though the clerk asked him to change his order he stuck with his system and won.

Of course when it comes to creative ability and personal achievement I... [ More ]

Reply #618

Stack47 — Mon, 13 May 2013 22:02:48 GMT

I've patronized him ever since the first time he said there is no winning system because it was obvious he had no idea how real lottery players bet. By saying over and over again there is no winning system, he is actually hoping someone will eventually show him a winning system so he can recoup some of his huge gambling losses.

Why else would he whine about JKING only giving Yes or No options in his poll about posting winning systems?

If he was one of Catlin's students, Catlin had him stan... [ More ]

Reply #617

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 21:50:07 GMT

Reply #616

Stack47 — Mon, 13 May 2013 21:45:03 GMT

Before this month is over, some players are going to win the PB and MM jackpots and it might be Thrifty's devised method. There are several free how to play lottery games books and articles on the Internet and you really ought to read one instead of continually showing your ignorance of lottery play and gaming.

the immense 50% House Edge

The house edge is an accumulative effect over millions of outcomes and for the same reason Catlin's and Blue Jay's challenges requires millions of outco... [ More ]

Reply #615

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 21:16:21 GMT

Reply #614

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 21:10:05 GMT

Now Jammy wants to insert loyalty into the discussion? Is there no end to the convoluted twisting of the subject matter? His self imposed web of scrambled logic is a boondoggle of the mind.

Reply #613

jimmy4164 — Mon, 13 May 2013 17:33:22 GMT

Stack47,

It's really not necessary to reply in such detail to my rhetorical questions.

You said, I did play some of those games and did have fun and some success, but I had more fun and much more success reinvesting in another area all made possible by my pick-3 winnings. This must surely disillusion a lot of Pick-3 players here. While they've been struggling for the past 7 years to get relief from the immense 50% House Edge that the lotteries hold over their heads, you've been greed... [ More ]

Reply #612

Stack47 — Mon, 13 May 2013 17:08:41 GMT

What caused your success to falter after 2 years?

I should have known words like success and fun are foreign to you when you said you were a stock trader. The effect of Voodoo economics was beginning and I found I was having more fun and more success in that area than using Mr. Z's pick-3 methods. I guess since you never won playing the lottery, you can't relate to investing the winnings and use the time spent picking numbers to reinvest in other areas.

Your ignorance of how real pick-3 p... [ More ]

Reply #611

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 14:18:45 GMT

Reply #610

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 14:11:11 GMT

Jammy logs off and watches from a different user name every time I start posting.

Reply #609

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 14:08:40 GMT

Generated Lottery Numbers

Word(s)/Phrase: Jammy doesn't play the lottery.

Game: Multi-State Mega Millions

Method 1: 08-13-18-23-43, Mega Ball: 32

Method 2: 18-21-27-37-52, Mega Ball: 04

Method 3: 08-13-16-25-55, Mega Ball: 12

Method 4: 09-10-24-41-48, Mega Ball: 14

Method 5: 31-33-42-54-56, Mega Ball: 11

Method 6: 02-31-37-39-46, Mega Ball: 04

https://www.lotterypost.com/words-to-numbers

Reply #608

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 14:01:10 GMT

I use this winning system and make an income from the lottery.

Generated Lottery Numbers

Word(s)/Phrase: 5 + 1 winner (Normalized)

Game: Multi-State Mega Millions

Method 1: 19-20-24-28-42, Mega Ball: 30

Method 2: 02-16-28-29-30, Mega Ball: 41

Method 3: 10-21-27-28-33, Mega Ball: 44

Method 4: 03-14-17-26-36, Mega Ball: 06

Method 5: 06-22-25-27-53, Mega Ball: 31

Method 6: 18-36-44-45-47, Mega Ball: 08

https://www.lotterypost.com/words-to-numbers

Reply #607

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 13:51:17 GMT

Lottery players are winners Jammy. You dont play the lottery.

Reply #606

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 13:49:10 GMT

How to Win the Lottery Every Single Time You Play

I never lose when I play the lottery.

Reply #605

Ronnie316 — Mon, 13 May 2013 13:46:31 GMT

Reply #604

jimmy4164 — Mon, 13 May 2013 13:37:02 GMT

Stack47,

you asked, Did you miss the part where I said I 'had some success for a couple of years'?

No, I didn't. In fact, it was the most telling and hilarious part of your posting!

What caused your success to falter after 2 years?

Did Mr. Z lose his touch,

did Ohio install new ball machines,

or did you simply run out of luck?

--Jimmy4164

Reply #603

Stack47 — Sun, 12 May 2013 19:42:23 GMT

Did you miss the part where I said I had some success for a couple of years ?

Anyone reading this thread could had some success playing Keith Price's picks for a week too. You're stuck on the notion nobody can win playing any lottery game over time based on your very limited knowledge of how people play. All your simulation are based on highly unlikely limited real play with limited bets and from that you reach a conclusion and use it, probably trying to pretend you're an expert on lottery st... [ More ]

Reply #602

LottoBoner — Sun, 12 May 2013 17:18:28 GMT

Dream of dog and big rat

Reply #601

jimmy4164 — Sun, 12 May 2013 04:33:41 GMT

Stack47,

I'm disappointed. I thought that someone like yourself who had endured such a long, arduous, and thankless journey through the number fields of the lottery, would have shown at least a little appreciation for my offering. I'll just have to take consolation in the possibility that you'll remember my post on some future date, and act on it.

Here's what you wrote back in 2006: I started buying Mr. Z's Ohio pick-3 workouts in 1981 and had some success with his Scientific Number... [ More ]

Reply #600

Stack47 — Sun, 12 May 2013 01:20:41 GMT

I'm taking a chance here because if Jimmy believes 13 hours is a prompt response, 2 hours must be a rapid response.

Many people erroneously believe that the lottery is just a game of chance. The numbers are randomly selected, they say, and there s no way to beat the system. Well, there s a name for such people: losers.

I'd say the name is more like a skeptical wana-be mathematics professor emeritus with basic high school math. Why don't you respond in threads closer to your area of exper... [ More ]

Reply #599

jimmy4164 — Sat, 11 May 2013 23:12:20 GMT

How to Win the Lottery Every Single Time You Play

Oliver Lee Bateman says, Can you really win the lottery every single time you play? In a word, yes. In two words, heck yes.

Well Stack47, here's an article that I think you and Ronnie316 will be very encouraged by.

http://goodmenproject.com/moustacheclubofamerica/how-to-win-the-lottery-every-single-time-you-play/

Unfortunately, you might eventually get bored generating your income by cashing a steady stream of winning lottery t... [ More ]

Reply #598

Stack47 — Sat, 11 May 2013 21:31:43 GMT

If you apply yourself and/or enlist the help of a friend, I'm sure you can learn to be a Stock Trader too.

Or I could just buy shares of Berkshire Hathaway and Warren Buffet can do all the trading. Buffet's rule number one is Don't lose money so that means investing in a company's future and not what an amateur calls stock trading .

It looks to me like you and Stack47 may have studied elementary school math together and/or taught each other QuickBasic - how nice.

I've never had any D... [ More ]

Reply #597

LottoBoner — Sat, 11 May 2013 20:04:00 GMT

I think Todd may be making money.I am sure Gail Howard and Richard Lusting and maybe Ion Saliu makes a dime or too.

Reply #596

Elizabeth03 — Sat, 11 May 2013 19:55:07 GMT

I'd love to have an income from the lottery numbers, so I can travel and rent or buy a house; instead of looking to rent an apartment'.

The financial freedom from it would make my life alot better..

Reply #595

Tami333 — Sat, 11 May 2013 15:35:46 GMT

JoshUK...You are right!

It can be a 2nd Income when my 3-digit hits and I do not find myself

making a withdraw against my regular income.

I look at it as the Balls just get blown around, sucked up in the tube and if it's your Lucky Day , then Woo Hoo!

(New and LOVE this site though as I have picked up on some interesting things and the LP members are Lots of FUN!!)

Thank you Gentlemen, for all your methods. I do enjoy reading them.

Reply #594

Ronnie316 — Sat, 11 May 2013 14:08:21 GMT

You both also seem to overlook the same things when it comes to simulations.

Can you come up with a simulator that tests more than one line per draw Jammy

Reply #593

garyo1954 — Sat, 11 May 2013 13:37:31 GMT

Yes! jimboo-boo, I had a wonderful vacation. Thanks for asking. Nothing like having a staff of 20-odd year old nurses visiting at all hours of the day and night to get blood, take blood pressure, and stick you with needles and pour pills down you. Not to mention how they wheeled me around on gurneys and in wheel chairs, assisted with surgeries and procedures, put me to sleep and woke me up, and brought me coffee, ice cream and donuts.

Truth is, I had more fun watching the 23 year old, 5 2 , 1... [ More ]

Reply #592

jimmy4164 — Sat, 11 May 2013 06:18:19 GMT

Preposterous Suppositions

Well, what do you know - garyo1954 comes out of the woodwork! I guess Stack47 needs some time off. I was expecting someone like Kola or JosephusMinimus to pick up the BAT, but no, it must be garyo1954's turn. I hope he enjoyed his 3 month vacation.

It looks to me like you and Stack47 may have studied elementary school math together and/or taught each other QuickBasic - how nice. You both also seem to overlook the same things when it comes to simulations. You se... [ More ]

Reply #591

garyo1954 — Sat, 11 May 2013 03:04:19 GMT

Jimboozle, the phrase which describes this scenario is Preposterous Supposition.

Stack is right. Who are these people buying $5 Pick 3 QPs per day for 5 years? Even people who spent 12 years licking windows on the short bus are not that mentally challenged.

A scientific approach along this line relies on a realistic behavorial understanding of which your Preposterous Supposition shows very little.

Likely you should factor in an attrition rate for players who show losses.

Things

Reply #590

Ronnie316 — Fri, 10 May 2013 22:52:44 GMT

I have my regular numbers in play. Perhaps an income producing play

Reply #589

Ronnie316 — Fri, 10 May 2013 22:21:03 GMT

Good point.... Jammy a day trader......

Reply #588

JoshUK — Fri, 10 May 2013 19:34:17 GMT

The only people making money, are the people who have won big and earning interest.

Reply #587

LottoBoner — Fri, 10 May 2013 19:25:03 GMT

Maybe he is a red communist day trader who uses the flag formation for trading, but then says the flag formation is stupid for lotto

Reply #586

jimmy4164 — Fri, 10 May 2013 18:45:29 GMT

It's really not that daunting, Stack47.

If you apply yourself and/or enlist the help of a friend, I'm sure you can learn to be a Stock Trader too.

https://www.scottrade.com

--Jimmy4164

Reply #585

Stack47 — Fri, 10 May 2013 16:49:40 GMT

This REALLY is a waste of time.

I'm still trying to figure out why you would think preaching to the wrong choir would be worthwhile. The debate never was about understanding the math but how math is applied and because of your Delusions of Grandeur, you can't see it.

Why provide entertainment for a bunch of clowns without receiving any compensation?

You can't even get your parting shot right because it is the clowns who provide the entertainment. Thanks for even more entertainment... [ More ]

Reply #584

Ronnie316 — Fri, 10 May 2013 00:02:42 GMT

Reply #583

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 23:49:50 GMT

IMA Clown.

Reply #582

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 23:40:09 GMT

Jammy lives in a world of imaginary truths. What is truth? being his favorite one.

Reply #581

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 23:23:24 GMT

Typical tuck and run tactic Jammy. It was to be expected anytime your folly would start to come to light.

Reply #580

jimmy4164 — Thu, 09 May 2013 23:17:26 GMT

If there was more than a glimmer of understanding from a handful of people, it might make sense to continue, but there isn't. This REALLY is a waste of time. Why provide entertainment for a bunch of clowns without receiving any compensation

Reply #579

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 23:09:27 GMT

Boney winning at poker really would be beating the odds

Reply #578

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 23:04:06 GMT

Apparently THATS what he considers his day job .... being a day trader .....

Looks like you were right about him taking BIG losses. Nice call Stack.

Reply #577

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 23:01:04 GMT

I never said anything about QPs.............. You are a yellow communist. Do you deny it

Reply #576

Boney526 — Thu, 09 May 2013 22:15:03 GMT

Good luck playing No Limit Texas Hold'em after studying all the Poker probabilities. The thing I can't understand, if you can learn that much from books, why does a member of the Pro Poker Hall of Fame say about Hold'em, It takes five minutes to learn but a lifetime to master. ?

Because it only takes 5 minutes to learn the rules of the game, but it takes a lot of hard work to learn how to implement strategies to beat other players at no limit hold' em. NLHE, played without a rake, has n... [ More ]

Reply #575

Stack47 — Thu, 09 May 2013 20:48:59 GMT

I'm a stock market trader.

LMAO!

Speaking of Delusions of Grandeur.

Reply #574

Stack47 — Thu, 09 May 2013 20:46:48 GMT

I've spent a long time trying to explain to Stack WHY this happens,

Speaking of Delusions of Grandeur, almost every paperback gaming book (some from the 1960s) has a section simply explaining the house edge as the difference between what the house pays off on a bet and true odds. For every $1,000,000 in wagers, the house should keep $50,000 with a 5% house edge.

Do you really think a player who walks from a Craps table with $9500 profit wants to hear your opinion why they should have $500... [ More ]

Reply #573

Stack47 — Thu, 09 May 2013 20:07:12 GMT

I had hoped you WOULD explain to everyone how/why my P3/P4 Predictions do as well as anyone else's after 140,000 picks.

You're not even in the top 50 with your pick-4 ratio and 8 players in that group have more picks than you (one has over 3 million). Nothing to explain because you're not doing very well. However I can explain why you believe you're doing as well; Delusions of Grandeur.

I remember that thread about the Stupid Tax and when you asked me to be more specific when I agreed wit... [ More ]

Reply #572

jimmy4164 — Thu, 09 May 2013 17:58:42 GMT

Sorry Ronnie316 that I've confused you. Like LottoBoner and his problems with the Pope and Galileo, you're somewhat confused regarding Capitalism and Communism. According to you, apparently, Communists buy QuickPicks, and Capitalists waste their time devising lottery systems to increase their bottom line. I'm a stock market trader. Trust me, you're confused.

--Jimmy4164

Reply #571

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:53:17 GMT

Reply #570

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:51:47 GMT

Reply #569

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:51:11 GMT

Reply #568

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:47:42 GMT

That's why I call Jammy an Idiot. And he considers it a compliment.

Reply #567

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:46:11 GMT

Thanks, very creative I thought. Everyone here knows Jammys true agenda is Communism. His core purpose is to spread doubt, and question anything that smacks of creative design or personal achievement.

Reply #566

rcbbuckeye — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:41:26 GMT

Awwww. So sweet.

LOL.

Reply #565

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:33:59 GMT

Boney526

+

jimmy4164

Reply #564

rcbbuckeye — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:32:17 GMT

jimmy insists that anyone here that likes to discuss systems and strategies has an agenda, and is trying to lead newbies astray. For some reason, he just can't believe there are people here that enjoy trying different strategies and therefore feels like he must rain on anyone's parade that he disagrees with.

If I disagree with a system or strategy, I just let it go. Who am I to tell that person or people they are wrong or they have an agenda ?

I don't know why jimmy just can't let people h... [ More ]

Reply #563

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:14:00 GMT

Have you boys thought about dating Jammy

Reply #562

Ronnie316 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:12:39 GMT

Sounds like you and Jammy have come together as a real nice team against the innumerate lottery players

Reply #561

jimmy4164 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:10:56 GMT

I agree

Reply #560

Boney526 — Thu, 09 May 2013 16:05:03 GMT

Jimmy, this one sentence sums up why you should give up here. (In terms of arguing with Stack.)

I hope Boney doesn't notice your pick-4 lifetime prize ratio exceeds the house edge.

I've spent a long time trying to explain to Stack WHY this happens, and yet he obviously didn't read what I wrote because he read it's normal for results to deviate randomly as everyone loses at exactly the house edge all the time.

Pretty obvious that Stack only cares to argue for the sake o... [ More ]

Reply #559

jimmy4164 — Thu, 09 May 2013 15:50:43 GMT

Stack47 says, If you're having fun predicting 10 lines of numbers for all states, I won't rain on your parade.

Go ahead and rain on my parade. I had hoped you WOULD explain to everyone how/why my P3/P4 Predictions do as well as anyone else's after 140,000 picks. Be my guest.

Stack47 asks, Why is it when others are having fun discussing systems and strategies, you try to rain on their parades?

Why? I've answered this question many times. Here's just one example...

https://www... [ More ]

Reply #558

Stack47 — Thu, 09 May 2013 13:17:42 GMT

If you're having fun predicting 10 lines of numbers for all states, I won't rain on your parade. Why is it when others are having fun discussing systems and strategies, you try to rain on their parades

Reply #557

jimmy4164 — Thu, 09 May 2013 07:04:44 GMT

There you go again!

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/260532/3056557

Reply #556

Stack47 — Thu, 09 May 2013 01:24:51 GMT

What I thought did was select my alloted set of 10 numbers based on a simple criteria, which had nothing whatsoever to do with WHAT state they were going to be bet in, nor WHEN.

We've already had a discussion on your inability to think clearly so let's not go there.

So, what condition must be met

The same type of conditions Ronnie bet on when he matched 5 out of 28 numbers.

Reply #555

jimmy4164 — Wed, 08 May 2013 23:28:49 GMT

Stack47,

You said, you created a condition so any type of bet on those numbers depends on your condition being met.

Seriously, I can't wait to learn what I created!

What I thought did was select my alloted set of 10 numbers based on a simple criteria, which had nothing whatsoever to do with WHAT state they were going to be bet in, nor WHEN.

So, what condition must be met before I pull the trigger with these numbers in all 50 states the next time?

--Jimmy4164

Reply #554

Stack47 — Wed, 08 May 2013 02:35:36 GMT

I'm sorry you don't understand why my P3 P4 picks result in Prize Ratios right in the Ballpark with most other Board Predictors who have at least 140,000 (AllStates P3+P4) Picks thus far in 2013.

I suppose next you'll tell me how much thought you put into picking the same numbers for all the States/Providences/jurisdictions (midday and evening). I hope Boney doesn't notice your pick-4 lifetime prize ratio exceeds the house edge.

Of course my choices were not random, and I'm surprised you... [ More ]

Reply #553

Ronnie316 — Tue, 07 May 2013 22:29:31 GMT

Reply #552

Ronnie316 — Tue, 07 May 2013 22:28:43 GMT

And what about a group of 45 lines that is organized? Can it have BETTER ODDS than 45 QPs

Reply #551

Ronnie316 — Tue, 07 May 2013 22:27:28 GMT

Its a fun little exercise in futility Jammy, but your what if scenarios are limited to one line per draw. I have conceded from the beginning that QPs and SPs are all the same when it comes to a limited number of lines.

The real question is about BETTER ODDS for those organized groups of 5000 lines or more.

Reply #550

kenowizard777 — Tue, 07 May 2013 21:10:25 GMT

hi ,,Elizabeth few years back you talk with my daughter Sarah, when she won 5000 on atlantic keno, im back studying keno to my user name is kenowizard777, good luck tc

Reply #549

jimmy4164 — Tue, 07 May 2013 18:49:29 GMT

Stack47,

I'm sorry you don't understand why my P3 P4 picks result in Prize Ratios right in the Ballpark with most other Board Predictors who have at least 140,000 (AllStates P3+P4) Picks thus far in 2013.

Of course my choices were not random, and I'm surprised you don't see the criteria I used.

--Jimmy4164

Reply #548

jimmy4164 — Tue, 07 May 2013 18:43:49 GMT

Don't you think you've got the roles reversed here, LottoBoner?

The Pope believed the earth was flat - Galileo disagreed.

--Jimmy4164

Reply #547

LottoBoner — Tue, 07 May 2013 18:41:30 GMT

I accept the conclusions of Jammy Jam and Bammy Bone!!! LONG LIVE the CALIFORNIA LOTTERY

Reply #546

LottoBoner — Tue, 07 May 2013 18:36:06 GMT

Jimmy is the pontif. He loves to pontificate. He would be Pope Urban the VIII

We can only be measly galileos.

He wants to put us all in an ivory tower, and I think he want to burn ronnie at the stake.

Reply #545

RJOh — Tue, 07 May 2013 18:32:43 GMT

Mathematics says nothing, it's the people using mathematics that are doing the talking and they all aren't saying the same things. Lottery players have a choice, either do their own math and come up with their own conclusions or accept the conclusions of someone else.

Reply #544

SergeM — Tue, 07 May 2013 18:09:53 GMT

Mathematics says don't play. If you intend to play qp or own picks, it comes down to don't play. The winner is the lottery itself.

Reply #543

Stack47 — Tue, 07 May 2013 17:40:09 GMT

There are people that will always choose the negative side of any type of discussion and will take it to the extreme. Jimmy offered his opinion hoping to create further debate with those who don't agree with it.

I've always tried to make it clear that no matter what methods you use to choose your numbers, your chances of winning over the long haul will be no better [or worse] than those who purchase Quick Picks.

You and I know his logic is terrible and can simply say we disagree, but he... [ More ]

Reply #542

Stack47 — Tue, 07 May 2013 17:07:04 GMT

Why would I need to check the Prediction Boards when you just posted the numbers?

My question was based on the fact you gave multiple three and four digit numbers so asked if you have a betting strategy. Looking at your past predictions it appears you have no scientific approach and simply throw out a bunch of numbers to see if any of them hit.

It's obvious these numbers were not randomly selected and contradicts your theory all numbers are created equally . Because all the three digit num... [ More ]

Reply #541

jimmy4164 — Tue, 07 May 2013 06:17:37 GMT

Check my predictions on the Boards, before they disappear over the top.

Reply #540

rcbbuckeye — Tue, 07 May 2013 03:45:51 GMT

Ooooohhhh jimmy. I have seen the error of my ways.

You!!! are all knowing. You know who is right (you), and who is wrong (system players).

LOL.

Reply #539

Ronnie316 — Tue, 07 May 2013 02:41:35 GMT

Jammy is the Rocket Man.

Reply #538

Ronnie316 — Tue, 07 May 2013 02:40:56 GMT

He can't win if he doesn't play.

Reply #537

Elizabeth03 — Tue, 07 May 2013 02:39:23 GMT

jimmy- hope you win alot of money too

Reply #536

Stack47 — Tue, 07 May 2013 01:41:39 GMT

000, 001, 002, 010, 011, 020, 100, 101, 110, 111

0000, 0001, 0010, 0011, 0100, 0101, 0110, 0111, 1000, 1001

Have a specific betting strategy or do you wager equally on all of them

Reply #535

jimmy4164 — Tue, 07 May 2013 00:25:10 GMT

You (rcbbbuckeye) said,

No you don't hope he has good security.....hello....are you that stupid???

And you also said, Who the f*** are you to tell anyone they are wrong???

Are you normally regarded as a kind, caring, and understanding person, or do you talk this way to your friends and family as well? I hope not, especially for the sake of any children you might have [or have had] to deal with.

First of all, just because RL-RANDOMLOGIC and I have had a few words in the pa... [ More ]

Reply #534

rcbbuckeye — Mon, 06 May 2013 23:35:35 GMT

No you don't hope he has good security.....hello....are you that stupid???

What I'm trying to say is you are like somebody else here that says the same thing over and over again. Really, everybody, I mean, everybody knows what you have to say. It's nothing new. There are people here that like to try different strategies, and different ideas to win the lottery. That is their entertainment. There is nothing wrong with that. You don't have to, and you shouldn't tell anybody what they're doing is... [ More ]

Reply #533

RJOh — Mon, 06 May 2013 23:00:03 GMT

While a simulation shows what will happen overall in a lottery, it also show there will be winners. It's just that the big winners are few and far between and it suggests those winners did nothing different than the losers. Players who continue to do better than the odds might suggest would think differently.

Reply #532

CajunWin4 — Mon, 06 May 2013 22:44:19 GMT

The simulation really means nothing at all !!! It a simulation of the Games . Their could be a built in bias against sample Predictions to show a lost in simulation. It's a RNG draw not a Mechanical Draw just like Powerball and Mega-Millions games .

Reply #531

Stack47 — Mon, 06 May 2013 22:39:32 GMT

but you won't change the fact that the simulation will lose at 50%.

Over time all state lottery pick-3 games that pay 500 to 1 will average around a 50% profit. In the same 10 years the PA Lottery made a 50% profit, they still probably paid out $1.825 billion in prizes. You don't need to run a simulations when you can look at the actual yearly financial reports.

You'll be able to pick out one guy who only lost, say 20%, but you'll also be able to find a guy who lost 98%.

Over 5000 pl... [ More ]

Reply #530

onlymoney — Mon, 06 May 2013 21:26:13 GMT

Ha ha,

Games played: 37,480 (2 tickets each week for 360.4 years)

Your Ticket Numbers Quick Pick Power Play Max Fast

Lotto Draw Numbers Show Matches Slow

Stop Match Prize Odds Winning Tickets Win Frequency

$4 1 in 55 691 1 in 54

$4 1 in 111 320 1 in 117

$7 1 in 706 62 1 in 604

$7 1 in 360 104 1 in 360

$100 1 in 12,245 0 0

$100 1 in 19,088 1 1 in 37,480

$10,000 1 in 648,976 0 0

$1,000,000 1 in 5,153,633 0 0

$222,000,000