Quantum Mechanics

Reply #47

Kola — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:57:28 GMT

Thanks for the link MillionsWanted. I first learned about the Global Consciousness Project from journalist's Lynne McTaggart's well-researched and well-written book THE FIELD: The Quest for the Secret Force of the Universe . Being an experienced journalist, she doggedly questions all these great scientists about the implications of this Field. They help her to understand the science. In turn, she does an excellent job communicating the material and making it accessible to readers.

Reply #46

MillionsWanted — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:32:46 GMT

The Global Consciousness Project comes to mind: http://noosphere.princeton.edu

Reply #45

Igamble — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 04:24:28 GMT

Reply #44

Kola — Thu, 17 Jul 2014 01:04:43 GMT

Reply #43

Stack47 — Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:37:52 GMT

And yet, you (and RJ) persist in your belief that historical lottery data can help you predict future winning draws.

Are you ignoring the fact that data mirrors the mathematical probability plus or minus standard deviation or are you just playing make believe pretending you're a mathematician?

I'm sure that Psychologists have a name for that condition.

It's common knowledge on LP that you suffer from delusions of grandeur. You even mentioned a bunch of long dead mathematicians saying... [ More ]

Reply #42

jimmy4164 — Thu, 26 Jun 2014 03:46:10 GMT

Stack47,

Note that RJOh also made other observations.

Everything you say about lottery games and gambling in general, we already know.

And yet, you (and RJ) persist in your belief that historical lottery data can help you predict future winning draws.

I'm sure that Psychologists have a name for that condition.

BTW, who are the rest of us, and how many of you are there?

--Jimmy4164

Reply #41

Stack47 — Thu, 26 Jun 2014 01:54:02 GMT

it's all stuff that someone else has said already.

RJ's observations about you are almost the same as the rest of us. Everything you say about lottery games and gambling in general, we already know.

Reply #40

jimmy4164 — Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:17:29 GMT

You're even less observant than I originally thought. My Predictions are not designed to do better than those produced by wasted efforts with systems, and my postings are in no way designed to tell you how to beat the lottery. Did you think that was the case

Reply #39

eddessaknight — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 22:17:36 GMT

Aye Kim Lee, collective focused conciseness has proven amazingly to be quite effective in many applications (but obviously not each every time).

Fortuna

Eddessa_knight

Reply #38

KimLee — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 17:25:49 GMT

Would it work better if many people focused on the same numbers

Reply #37

MillionsWanted — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:35:36 GMT

It's The Secret or if you want to call it The Law of Attraction.

How is this supposed to work when you got millions of players wishing to win?

Not saying it will work if only one of the players used the law of attraction.

Reply #36

Pick3Guy — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 16:00:22 GMT

Well, I just got finished reading the book. There's no mathematics involved at all. They just tell you to focus your thoughts on your numbers to make them win. Of course, you don't really need a book to tell you this.

Anyway, it's a case of my thoughts versus your thoughts. It's just like the mindflex game, only it's with the lottery. In that case, it doesn't sound so promising.

Reply #35

RJOh — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:58:37 GMT

What you described sounds similarly like what Jimmy has unsuccessfully been trying to accomplishes. His prediction statistics doesn't support that what he's posting is worth reading, it's all stuff that someone else has said already.

Reply #34

Kola — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:06:16 GMT

Yes, rcbbuckeye, I could be very wrong, but it appears that may be the case at times. All in all though, I like Jimmy and those of his ilk. I don't take their opinions personally, even while challenging them, partly because I've noticed that the more I take things personally the less I learn from them, for I have no doubt that even dissenters can be vessels of truths. Be well...

Kola

Reply #33

Kola — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:54:37 GMT

One more thing Jimmy. I mentioned above that we all Time Travel. Don't blush about what I'm about to say, but you do too. Yes, you with your use of statistics in highlighting your belief about the randomness of the lottery, also incorporate aspects of Time Travel. I love stats, and they certainly have their merit, but they way they are sometimes used can present an inaccurate or rather incomplete analysis, because statistics often have a bias of being too STATIC. If you'll permit me to be whimsi... [ More ]

Reply #32

rcbbuckeye — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:00:41 GMT

Kola,

Jimmy always thinks everybody who thinks different than him has an ulterior motive to gather disciples and followers to make money off.

He just can't believe that some people like to look for different ways to play the lottery.

Reply #31

Kola — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 13:34:14 GMT

Hi Jimmy,

I have no disciples , as you call it, nor am under any illusion that my posts about Time Travel generates that much excitement. It shouldn't, because as said earlier, we all Time Travel. In my opinion, no one is immune from doing do. No matter what tool, technique, method or system one uses, all persons, unknowingly so, will incorporate aspects of Time Travel with varying degrees of success. Anyway, don't let my posts trouble you Jimmy, for while your humor has made me laugh, you to... [ More ]

Reply #30

jimmy4164 — Wed, 25 Jun 2014 03:53:40 GMT

Kola,

And as to your fanciful query about where you should look for reports of my success, either in 'tabloid rags'(funny) or 'peer-reviewed journals'(also ha, ha), I would say, WHO AM I that any success that I could ever hope to attain should be anything so note-worthy. It's not even worth a tabloid tweet, for it wouldn't be all that remarkable.

Well, so much for the excitement you may have generated among some of your disciples when you alluded to your handle on Time Travel in rela... [ More ]

Reply #29

Kola — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:33:29 GMT

LOL. I sincerely thank you Jimmy for the best laugh I've had all day! Even though it wasn't meant too kindly, I can appreciate your 'humor'. I won't tussle with your beliefs about my posts. You've done your own learning, walked your own path, and I can respect what your learning has taught you to accept or not accept. I've never denied all the usual ways of analyzing the lottery. I use them myself, lol. But as with anything in life, there is always so much 'more'. In the case of the lottery, som... [ More ]

Reply #28

jimmy4164 — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:21:46 GMT

Kola,

All those who believe your posts are more in touch with reality than mine are welcome to throw away all their earthly possessions and follow you. They should have no fear, if they really believe, since you promise them rewards from future lottery play that will follow from your ethereal solutions to the universal problems of space and time. In the interest of the efficient use of our time, an important question the majority of us must answer is where we should look for reports of you... [ More ]

Reply #27

Kola — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 09:53:55 GMT

Hello Jimmy,

It's cool you don't understand or agree with my 'opinion', although I do hope for my own sake that I've long since moved past the 'opinion stage', lol. Let me share one more with you, an alternate perspective to the one you shared in the link above.

Let's assume that the numbers that are drawn for any lottery are indicative of an Open System. Let's posit that in this open system there is an exchange of energy/information that flows from the environment to the numbered balls. I... [ More ]

Reply #26

jimmy4164 — Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:04:53 GMT

Stack47,

Is it really necessary to explain the effect time travel could have on lottery play?

KOLA's opinion notwithstanding - YES!

Look Into the PAST a Few Years For An Explanation...

Be sure to note my reference to a Cast of Characters!

--Jimmy4164

Reply #25

Kola — Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:34:49 GMT

The Pick 3 is based on quantum numbers, and it is Not based on quantum numbers. Both are true, and as to which is true for you, is obviously the one that can serve you the best. So one need not even consider quantum numbers in order to work on the Pick 3, especially if you're Thinking is not remotely inclined this way. There are those like, Mike27 of the Numeralogic Masters thread, who may be wired to see quantumness in numbers, and approaching the lottery that way will work for them. All ways c... [ More ]

Reply #24

samgirl280 — Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:26 GMT

So are the results of the pick3 really based on Quantum numbers.

like those guys or guy who once had a thread here on the site.

numeralogic masters something .

i was looking into it and its so complex

Reply #23

Kola — Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:52:15 GMT

Yes, Time Travel is the correct answer, the only answer, and we are all time travelers with varying degrees of experience. I think All Forms of Prediction, by default and oftentimes unbeknowst to the player, incorporate aspects of time travel. All of us manipulate numerical information in a myriad of different ways to Arrive at the correct answer that will show up some point in the future. The very tools, techniques, methods, and systems we use are part of that time machine toolbox. We think of

Reply #22

JADELottery — Mon, 23 Jun 2014 13:12:09 GMT

yeah, we've been known to cause many a headache, on a scattering of subjects, with plethora of peoples, in a conundrum of consciousness, while dreaming in divinity.

Reply #21

RJOh — Mon, 23 Jun 2014 03:34:41 GMT

NASA already has more than it can handle with its limited budget, it'll be up to private money to finance that.

Reply #20

savagegoose — Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:33:01 GMT

i play lotto schrodingers cat method, i dont check my tickets, and i havent lost till i see the numbers,.

div_prefs id= div_prefs

Reply #19

eddessaknight — Sun, 22 Jun 2014 21:52:04 GMT

Dr Carl Gustav Jung, a renowned Swiss psychiatrist was a founder of Analytical Psychology said: in all chaos there is a cosmos, in all disorder a secret order .

Perhaps the secret orders of the Freemasons or Rosicrucian's have the hidden formula?

Fortes fortuna juvat

Eddessa_Knight

Reply #18

Stack47 — Sun, 22 Jun 2014 19:58:36 GMT

There might be other applications and I just mentioned the obvious. Is it really necessary to explain the effect time travel could have on lottery play

Reply #17

SergeM — Sun, 22 Jun 2014 17:19:46 GMT

Back to the past! Somebody place a mirror here and there in the universe! A project for NASA

Reply #16

jimmy4164 — Sun, 22 Jun 2014 04:38:28 GMT

KimLee,

If what you're implying is that the way to beat the lottery is to build a Time Machine which allows you to play numbers that you bring back from the future, then, I agree.

Maybe Stack47 has learned how to apply Quantum Mechanics to this problem.

--Jimmy4164

Reply #15

KimLee — Sun, 22 Jun 2014 00:49:12 GMT

Nice work! Sound like exactly the correct answer to the question......

How could you apply quantum mechanics to the lottery

Reply #14

jimmy4164 — Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:48:42 GMT

I couldn't find any references to the lottery at that web page.

Did you

Reply #13

Stack47 — Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:07:17 GMT

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mechanics_of_time_travel

Reply #12

Lucky Loser — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 16:29:18 GMT

Fortunately, this can change since you can group the numbers in any way you want.

gcs5, this quote is directly from Pick3Guy in this thread and is all you need when developing combos. Please forget about Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Physics, and Quantum Leap...please. They have absolutely no place in a game with a specific field of numbers which are odd and even. What does have a place here is permutation where you do exactly what is says in the highlighted quote based on their positions.

Reply #11

Kola — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:49:52 GMT

I assume that when you mention quantum mechanics, you are speaking of it's math . If this is so, it may not readily applicable to the the lottery, because as you probably know, Quantum Mechanics is about the very small , the microscopic sub-atomic world. The Lottery is about the very large macroscopic world and may be more amendable to being used with Classical Physics. I do think though that you can use CONCEPTS from both quantum and classical physics to help you.

I won't go over all the man... [ More ]

Reply #10

Kola — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:28:39 GMT

In case anyone is truly interested, the author's full name is Sofia Louise Anderson.

Reply #9

onlymoney — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:46:05 GMT

Sorry, I was thinking of that fat comedian who always screamed.

Reply #8

MillionsWanted — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:39:56 GMT

How wrong can you get? It's Louise Anderson.

And Louie Anderson is not dead.

This must be a bad attempt at trolling.

Reply #7

onlymoney — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:32:03 GMT

Louie Anderson, the dead comedian wrote a book on Quantum Lottery? Didn't know he was into that stuff...hmmm, I guess we learn something new everyday. Thanks.

Reply #6

Duchess69 — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:29:00 GMT

Read the book by Louise Anderson

Quantum lottery you can purchase at Barnes and nobles......great book

Reply #5

MillionsWanted — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:17:25 GMT

Weird stuff...

Learn about the Quantum Eraser experiment

Reply #4

Tialuvslotto — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 12:11:14 GMT

I think these ideas have been discussed over on the math board.

Also you can try a search, especially for user JadeLottery. But I hope you have some math background, 'cause otherwise reading these posts will just cause a massive headache.

Reply #3

Pick3Guy — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 05:32:47 GMT

That's a very interesting question. This is something I've already been looking at. But, are you looking for a mathematical answer?

Well, just like the lottery, Quantum Mechanics involves chaos and uncertainty. The way to handle this is through the use of probability. However, the probabilities of individual digits and combos do not change. At least, theoretically. So, what's left then? Probabilities involving groups of numbers. Fortunately, this can change since you can group the numbers in... [ More ]

Reply #2

psykomo — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:54:39 GMT

g5:

U must drive a VERY smart car like Psyko !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

don't laugh Psyko may have a computer IN D car but where is it located????????!

smart car does like 2 GO skinny dippin if D GULL's DON T ^^^^^LAUGH

Reply #1

onlymoney — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:54:14 GMT

You'd have to give up all the contemporary methods you were indoctrinated with, when searching for winning numbers.

The people who witness the drawings have a definite effect on the outcome, solely based on their presence. Unfortunately, unless you were the only person witnessing the drawing, there's no better way to influence the outcome no matter how unlikely your influence may affect the drawing, it's the best chance you have.

Basically it's the observer who creates their reality.... [ More ]

Quantum Mechanics

gsc5 — Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:38:33 GMT

How could you apply quantum mechanics to the lottery