8 numbers that always contain next day's pairs/100% of time

Reply #31

CARBOB — Sat, 27 Sep 2014 11:12:57 GMT

34 35 36 37 are longest out boxes Fl Mid

There has been 4 consecutive draws with odd digits in P1, that needs to stop.

with all that said,

str8's

9/27/Mid

636 834 438

all can do is hope and pray!

will toss in a dbl 646

Reply #30

CARBOB — Sat, 27 Sep 2014 09:44:47 GMT

127

345

369

380

468

490

560

589

draw 9/26/14 716

draw 9/25/14 526

digit 2 repeated

digit 3 still longest overall out!

34 35 36 39 38 03

Reply #29

CARBOB — Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:14:18 GMT

07/23/14 3 5 4 354 345

06/25/14 3 5 4 354 345

04/16/14 9 3 6 936 369

07/21/13 5 3 4 534 345

07/09/13 4 5 3 453 345

03/20/13 5 4 3 543 345

02/07/13 9 3 6 936 369

01/15/13 9 6 3 963 369

06/25/12 6 9 3 693 369

05/15/12 3 6 9 369 369

12/26/11 9 6 3 963 369

08/05/11 3 9 6 396 369

02/15/11 9 6 3 963 369

02/05/11 6 3 9 639 369

11/28/10 3 9 6 396 369

10/26/10 3 5 4 354 345

07/10/10 5 4 3 543 345

05/09/10 3 5 4 354 345

Reply #28

Trix3 — Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:45:34 GMT

Yes did thoses hit in your state

Reply #27

CARBOB — Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:25:06 GMT

127

345

369

380

468

490

560

589

He doesn't use pairs!!! You do notice that only , 345, 369 are in the pairs, I posted

Reply #26

Trix3 — Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:09:39 GMT

Cool I wish he could give an example of his stuff

Reply #25

CARBOB — Fri, 26 Sep 2014 11:01:55 GMT

Fl Mid 9/25/14 526

Just guessing here. I would use the digits that hit yesterday 526, betting a digit repeats, 70% chance.

Pairs for 9/26/14 35 36

digit 3 is longest out overall

127

345

369

380

468

490

560

589

Reply #24

Trix3 — Fri, 26 Sep 2014 08:47:41 GMT

This is very interesting can you give on example on how the pairs work with the previous hit, please.

i follow all your stuff and it works for me.

Reply #23

CARBOB — Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:00:09 GMT

09/24/14 5 8 9

Sometimes, you may get lucky and hit all 3 digits, Fla Mid.

BTW, you never had a case to begin with. I would have ignored you. I don't like pairs or vtracs!! But, if you like pairs, use them as 2-digit strings.

Reply #22

Lildarryl — Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:47:40 GMT

Vtracs suck to me also. I wish I can delete it from my number crunching software.. I don't like looking at it

Reply #21

Wentworth — Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:41:27 GMT

I rest my case.......

Reply #20

WIN D — Wed, 24 Sep 2014 22:28:20 GMT

I don't use Vtracs either ....even though they were invented here in Atlanta and I have used them in the past and posted on them. I just never thought they were worth the trouble. However, I have showed folks how to use pairs and Vtrac's anyway. The same for pairs. I don't like pairs either and say so.

I finished showing how this works. That was it. Ready to go home. Then you pop in. I don't work here or for you smart alec. quotey.

For years I've said I don't use pairs because they make... [ More ]

Reply #19

Wentworth — Wed, 24 Sep 2014 07:51:29 GMT

IF win d doesnt use pairs at all thats ok and this system shows that these numbers have the pairs coming up 100% of the time and it looks like it does then it confusing that Win D keeps saying i dont use pairs i TOLD you! so what the heck is he showing pairs for? I would ask him myself but ive asked him questions before that he doesnt answer. Why is he so smart alecky?? why does he post things and not answer? I asked him a question about him saying its all mathematics and he answered im curious

Reply #18

CARBOB — Tue, 23 Sep 2014 08:55:05 GMT

That doesn't beat the smell of Napalm

Reply #17

WIN D — Tue, 23 Sep 2014 00:20:45 GMT

LOL garyo.....

I had some evil thoughts just then. Ah....12 gauge thoughts.... and the smell of gun powder in the morning. LOL

Reply #16

garyo1954 — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:56:28 GMT

Take them hunting!!!!

Nobody will ever know why they quit posting.

G

Reply #15

WIN D — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 23:45:27 GMT

HI Peer, notice I have never gone over to their post. Only it's them that cross over to my post with multiphased interruptions. And almost always....with nothing good.

Again......I have never posted anything to their post and interrupted their threads with negative purposes...ever.

I've tried my best to overlook and ignore their post..... and stay on my side of the street. They are the ones that search me out and post negative here..... and do their little leaky dances...and stay an... [ More ]

Reply #14

PeerGynt — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:50:58 GMT

I hope we can all be good friends here. I feel I have much to learn from WinD's wisdom, and much to learn from Adobea. And many others, too. Even the time-warpers

Reply #13

Chris — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:52:28 GMT

it didn't work, if I choose the number (4), and the number that came is 452.

it would not work, there is no 452.

Reply #12

Chris — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:48:17 GMT

Ok, so are you saying

If I pick the number (3) for example.

I look at the chart, and pair my (3) with those numbers; which would be:

321

327

334

345

336

369

338

380

346

368

349

390

356

360

358

389

and as long as there is no pairs, its a winner?

yes, or no.

Reply #11

WIN D — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:31:14 GMT

adopea ! Number one. Peer and I are friends.We have good history together and along the way several good hunting trips. Why don't you let Peer and Win D take care of Peer and Win D?

Actually ...just remembered. This is my thread and you can't order me to answer crap....even if it wasn't my thread. I don't use pairs almost never... and I've said so many times before.

........ You're attacking me again with same words like .....condescending ...close mind..despise ,,,contemptuous ,,,s... [ More ]

Reply #10

adobea78 — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 04:15:23 GMT

Y do not have to explain yourself to any one , you did posed a question which was not answered,

Reply #9

adobea78 — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:58:56 GMT

Can you address the question posed by Pee without deflecting to the system you despise with contempt. Logic is neither western or eastern! Condescending is self serving, a sign of close Mind

Reply #8

PeerGynt — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:36:33 GMT

Say, where was this curiosity and questions when all these other shaky pairs systems were jumping around with poor results? You afraid they might answer? LOL

I actually don't really follow most peoples' pair systems, WinD... but yours worked so well, it got me wondering... says much for your method here.

Reply #7

WIN D — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:05:34 GMT

That pairs by themselves aren't very useful.Just my opinion. ......and long draw out made up systems giving you pairs that just hit occasionally or even less .....are less useful. Why go to a lot of work and trouble for useless results? Go ask one of them. LOL

There are a lot of made up things that come and go. They don't produce standard, repeatable results based on any western knowledge. I think they would even make those smart Chinese barf. LOL

If your going to struggle with fi... [ More ]

Reply #6

PeerGynt — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 01:21:25 GMT

I'm feeling a little dense here, must be because I'm new, and am still struggling with things.

Because this is truly amazing, WinD - it's true, you pick any singles box, and there it is! A pair is contained in one of those eight boxes!

But I don't understand how to practically use this for playing. It's like an illusion: it's, essentially, all 120 boxes sort of compressed into eight. But these particular singles don't come up every time... we have to deal with 120 different boxes when we p... [ More ]

Reply #5

WIN D — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 23:24:56 GMT

Glad to do it. Check these out as well. Other SINGLE BOX number groups of 8 Permanent numbers that will work100% of the time.

Also easy,fast, and require NO workouts or software.

System statements from weak multi- posters that can't be proved are worthless. Such as ..... I get PMs from thousands of members all day that win Straight using hundreds of my made up systems ......is not proof. LOL

Show your proof. It has to be repeatable....and exceed++ the expected accidental HITS.

C... [ More ]

Reply #4

clothilde — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 19:32:19 GMT

Gosh, it really does work 100% of the time. Simple little thing. I've run all of the 120 singles and hit all of them.Have to say that normally I don't play much with pairs.

Every once in a while I do play only the pair game.When I think the third digit is too hard this will help. Tell you one thing else.It takes no work at all and that's the best part.Not even a pen or paper. We don't need anything more complicated than those 8 numbers. Fast and Easy and dependable.

you mentioned other num... [ More ]

Reply #3

WIN D — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 05:32:39 GMT

Yes it is.........100%

It Says Box singles in really big print....and uses the 120 chart for demo and everything. It for all of them. All of the time.

120 boxes list up there actually covers 720 singles or 72% or the chart? No doubles in the 120 chart.

Guess I could have said there are no doubles in the 120 singles chart...but work on 100% of the singles 100% of the times.

hell....I'm not a very good writer....and the pay around here sucks. LOL

The good news is....yo... [ More ]

Reply #2

adobea78 — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 05:24:54 GMT

8c3 for 56 picks assuming return digit or fixed digit

Reply #1

Rakster — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 05:17:02 GMT

Its not 100%.

Had 684 called 5 days ago...next day was 788

No pair there

8 numbers that always contain next day's pairs/100% of time

WIN D — Sun, 21 Sep 2014 05:11:31 GMT

Check the 8 Single box numbers below.

Your Next Day's number....will always contain a pair from one of the 8 box singles below. It's just Math but it might come in handy to spot your next pair.

Some systems just try do it with more numbers ........but they don't work at all sometimes....and not for ALL Box Singles ......100% of the time.

Check it out with the 120 number list below. Toss a dart at the list and find your next day's pair. It will be in one of the 8 boxes. Math methods... [ More ]