what basic filters to avoid conflicts in a lottery?

Reply #31

dr san — Tue, 29 Sep 2015 21:38:09 GMT

What are these conditions and some of its behavior is to be presented.

The following table shows the percentage of occurrence of each digit in each column obtained from 1400 actual results of the Mega Sena. The sets are not in draw order and not shown in the official result, but ordered with each other.

The percentages in order growing in columns 1, 2 and 3 are equal to the orders decreasing in columns 6, 5 and 4 respectively, ie the digit zero P1 has the same probability as the digit... [ More ]

Reply #30

dr san — Wed, 23 Sep 2015 01:11:22 GMT

ok,BOBP. PERFECT, CONGLATULATION,thank you

Reply #29

BobP — Tue, 22 Sep 2015 23:51:21 GMT

Even though Lotwin is no longer for sale due to the restrictive VAT tax in Europe you can still get the free demo at http://www.lotwin.com/ for a look at the filters and analysis of the filters needed to win past draws. Support for your Brazil 6/50 and 6/60 games. Please consider signing the anti-vat tax petition on the site.

Some past draws need many filters while others not so much. The strategy is to work out a plan that when things go your way trap the jackpot.

It is always best

Reply #28

dr san — Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:33:55 GMT

http://ezinearticles.com/?How-To-Use-VBA-To-Create-A-Moving-Average-Of-Prime-Numbers-In-Lotto-Results id=8442874

Reply #27

dr san — Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:56:44 GMT

hello , Moving Average indicator , allowing you to find a standard for the filter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moving_average

This indicator is used in WS traders (Dow Jones , NYSE , NASDAQ ... ) .

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/movingaverage.asp

Reply #26

RL-RANDOMLOGIC — Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:22:15 GMT

BobP

Concurrence is not causality.

Well said!!!!

RL

Reply #25

BobP — Mon, 21 Sep 2015 13:09:17 GMT

Not talking about digits. Concurrence is not causality.

BobP

Reply #24

dr san — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 22:06:38 GMT

hello bobp and rjol Certainly the next draw begins by analyzing the last draw, since the double intervals and crack proof this Despite all have the same chance to get out, we can make any prediction of at least one following group. The question of the last digits can and should be used.

Other filter is for reference frequency but by position by position, draw in ascending order is more profitable than in order of draw as it has more numbers that repeat in certain positions example the number

Reply #23

RJOh — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:05:17 GMT

If played them I brought them.

Reply #22

RJOh — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 20:01:49 GMT

When I'm filtering for combinations to play I probably have only looked at no more than 50,000 random combinations before I have 10-20 combinations to play. I'm not looking at every possible combinations. Except for the data file that I compare ever pick with to make sure it hasn't come up before my filters are two or three lines of code that limit which combination passes.

Reply #21

rinaleun — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:53:43 GMT

sorry who can help me? I cant understand ,haw to shoose number,filter

Reply #20

dr san — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 19:21:50 GMT

hello rjol e bobp, the first larger filters (with a higher limit of minor and major) and last more tuned filters, the problem which broad filters accompanies the standards? and tighter filters

Reply #19

rcbbuckeye — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:59:09 GMT

Did you buy any tics for real?

Heck, that jackpot is worth tossing $2 at.

Reply #18

RJOh — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 17:52:00 GMT

Since running off a group of combinations using filters isn't that hard why not run off several groups of combinations using filters in different ways and see which ones has the most winners.

That's what I did last night with the 10 PB lines I posted on the prediction board and played. I ran off four groups of 10 combinations first using filters the way I normally used them and then using them in some new ways making find 10 combinations to play a lot faster. I picked the last group to play... [ More ]

Reply #17

dr san — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:18:24 GMT

BOBP the last remaining digits of the last draw for next? How could they help to predict the next numbers

Reply #16

BobP — Sun, 20 Sep 2015 01:35:46 GMT

Funny you should ask that, seeing as how you already answered.

To be correct 45% of the time, do nothing more than eliminate the previous draw's six winning numbers from the field.

To be correct 50%+ of the time you have to be correct making several choices all of which can result in no way to win a jackpot when wrong. See it isn't just about one (44%) or two numbers (12%) from the previous draw repeating, you have to pick which one(s) it will be. Along with the risk three, four or f... [ More ]

Reply #15

RJOh — Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:46:12 GMT

Being correct 45% of the times means you're incorrect 55% of the time, wouldn't you want to make choices that are correct more than 50% of the time

Reply #14

RJOh — Sat, 19 Sep 2015 15:24:30 GMT

You're right of the 1355 OCL drawings 601 had no numbers from the previous drawing, that's 44.4%. 557 had one, 170 had two and 3 had 26. The percentages are even better for games with larger matrix, for PB it's 59%.

Reply #13

BobP — Sat, 19 Sep 2015 12:42:44 GMT

Sorry RJOh I didn't explain it well enough. In 6/49 each previous draw consists of 6 unique numbers. If we ignore those 6 numbers from the previous draw, (we're talking just those six not all past winning draws) not including them in our next draw's play, on the days this strategy proves correct 45% of the time we do indeed get the reduction.

Most filtering software includes this filter asking how many numbers from the previous draw among the lines, (most would pick one because the odds ar... [ More ]

Reply #12

SergeM — Sat, 19 Sep 2015 08:50:04 GMT

A key number can be used, with 6/45 your have 1/8th of all combinations left. Getting two key numbers right you can wheel with all the other numbers. The hardest filter is the key number. Playing is a risking. Dry games are a waste of time, eventually missing your luck for the real drawing. You cannot live with that.

Reply #11

RJOh — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 16:51:18 GMT

Ohio's Classic Lotto(6/49) has had 1355 drawings and no combinations of six has ever repeated but removing those combinations from the mix would only reduce the 13,983,816 possible combinations by 1355 less than 1%. Combinations of fives have repeated 16 times so removing any combinations that have matched five might be even better and only a small risk of removing a winner.

Reply #10

dr san — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:09:03 GMT

BOBP how can you know the limit of each filter for interfering in the other

Reply #9

dr san — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 13:43:10 GMT

Hello, perfect BOBP ok, silly, then very difficult to beat the odds

It has the standard precedent filter out 75% to 80% of the time, but this has to play various draws, followed filter to play in 5,10,20 sweepstakes, so the adjustment will come in.

The last draw can be a reference to the next delete we also have columns (positions) .as the DNA genetic code, BOBP, we could create one basic pattern divided into two = 8/2

Reply #8

BobP — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:59:48 GMT

Each filter affects the performance of the next by removing some of the combinations the next filter would have eliminated, diminishing return.

The strongest filter in the sense of least risk most accomplished combination removal wise would be the decision not to play any of the winning numbers from the previous draw.

In Pick-6/49 this decision is correct about 45% of the time and removes about 7.88 million combinations from play. Compare to 33% for first use of 3/3 odd even low high... [ More ]

Reply #7

dr san — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:14:25 GMT

Hello, sergem, thank you, the solar system has a central point the sun, the tree has a main trunk, the animals have the backbone, etc. etc .. Now in lottery, not circling, we can filter master to be the previous filter, patterns and filters

What comes before basic patterns, or filters

Reply #6

SergeM — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:20:58 GMT

I don't think that a certain filter is meant here. There is probability for understanding and maybe using it as guide for filtering.

There is no loss when you used the correct filter, and the payout was higher than the cost.

The question should have been, how or when do you use which filter to beat the chances by far more than 200%.

This is not a personal question, but one or more rules to beat probability.

If I could do with pick 3 what I did with lotto filters, I would get some... [ More ]

Reply #5

dr san — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:23:25 GMT

hello, BOBP perfect, conglatulations , thank you

Reply #4

BobP — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:20:38 GMT

Makes no difference.

Optimal strategy is to use the bulk filters that remove the most combinations first.

If you can do the job with fewer choices, that's the way to go.

The minor filters are more ways to lose, use only if you must.

Better to stretch the budget for a few bucks if you can avoid using minor filters to grind those over budget lines away.

BobP

Reply #3

garyo1954 — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:06:11 GMT

Works best when you play a different number in each position in a 6/49. Machine will not take your ticket if you try to play 25 in all positions. Be sure you have 6 different numbers on each line, m'kay

Reply #2

dr san — Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:38:38 GMT

Hello, the question which the pattern or filter what comes first, what is the basic filter

The trunk of the tree filter of the decision, the reference base,

Sergem not mix.

Reply #1

SergeM — Thu, 17 Sep 2015 22:28:38 GMT

I'd use filters without weapons to avoid intercontinental conflicts.

what basic filters to avoid conflicts in a lottery?

dr san — Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:42:37 GMT

what basic filters to avoid conflicts in a lottery