Are you sure the system does not work?

Reply #14

RJOh — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 19:39:16 GMT

The results speak for themselves.

Reply #13

aquariuslottery — Sat, 25 Jun 2016 06:46:13 GMT

I question for thought:

What is easier to predict (and more cost effective): numbers out of 10 or triads out of 1000?

I never bother with predicting triads, just too many combinations and not sufficient repetitions to make meaningful predictions.

Pick 5 out of 10 and wheel them at your convenience. Use your favorite prediction method (I usually opt for the latest hots as they have the best scoring ratio - most of the time):

Straight singles or doubles - 60 bets.

Box singles: 10 be... [ More ]

Reply #12

AllenB — Sat, 18 Jun 2016 19:58:00 GMT

I appreciate the advice; but, for me it is premature. You assume that my process lacks valuable Trend Data. Your conclusions are understandable since I have not been specific about the process. I have a New Trend. I have not found this idea used before in a search of LP Forums or Google for that matter. In the process of trying to predict the Next , I created a scenario that Ranked the next option using the FART Filter posted by ithastobesaid. The process was not able to predict the next triad b... [ More ]

Reply #11

bobby623 — Sat, 18 Jun 2016 14:47:20 GMT

I'll be blunt.

Why are you wasting time and energy on a method that won't help you win a dime????

The most important question in lottery analysis is - WHAT'S NEXT??

The answer(s) are found in trend data having clues, or triggers, or whatever, that point to 'best answers' from a large field of possibilities.

For example, if 248 was the last winning combination, what hard data do you have that makes you think that '942' is next???

Very little or a whole lot, like maybe 100 possibili... [ More ]

Reply #10

Jayhawk58 — Sat, 18 Jun 2016 04:16:53 GMT

Find a system you can understand, get really good at it, and use it to trap . You'll know when it feels right to double up or triple up on a combo or combo's. And when..........to watch.

What you are doing has all been done before.

Reply #9

Sunglasses — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:42:39 GMT

For luck

Reply #8

AllenB — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 20:00:26 GMT

Been Doing 1, Don't have much of 2 or 3

Reply #7

Lildarryl — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:50:44 GMT

divide and conquer. Is the way to go.

Patience and a bankroll

Reply #6

AllenB — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:29:39 GMT

By the way, I am also doing the same with Pick 4. The Options are 4 times those of Pick 3 so the data Blocks are huge.

Reply #5

AllenB — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 19:25:05 GMT

Yeah, I can't help it, That's Just Me. I always have to Start from Scratch. It is my Learning Process. I know it sounds complicated; but, What I am Doing is really Basic. It is just a Variation of Divide and Concur, which is the Path I am on right now. In the End, If I hit some Straights, I will continue. If Not, I will contemplate another Path.

Reply #4

destinycreation — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:47:57 GMT

You sound like you are starting from the position of Randomness, and going through a lot of headache for Pick 3. Pick 3 isn't worth all of this anxiety. Pick 4 pays more $$$ !!! However, for both Pick 3/4 , you are complicating the SIMPLE !!! Just choose an easy Pick 3 system to work with, and figure out your wagering strategy to maximize your profits. Lotto Laughs Patience is a Virtue system is one of my favorite simple pair systems, b/c it works well in the state of South Carolina.

htt... [ More ]

Reply #3

AllenB — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:27:19 GMT

I get confused about the Where here on LP. Seemed Like a System Question to me. I get that by custom this is Where specifics are discussed not general ideas. Todd will move it if it is in the Wrong Forum.

Thanks

Reply #2

Lildarryl — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:19:33 GMT

I read it all with an open mind. I just think it should be in discussion. Not system. For luck

Reply #1

AllenB — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:51:36 GMT

Daryl, I agree with your Ranking. It sounds like I am just saying Look at Me . I should have ended with this Question.

Anyone gone down this Road before? Anyone give up on a process without looking at the Other Side

Are you sure the system does not work?

AllenB — Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:51:06 GMT

I have been working on a process that uses very large data blocks in hopes of finding winners in categories of various filters, whose history I can track. My Idea was to Run 10-12 Scenarios (Filter Combinations) for Pick 3. Combining 2 filters per Position produces 64 Combinations of those filters. That means there are 640 Lines of combinations to choose from. The Winning Combination is in Each Group of 64. I have been running back tests to look at each group trying to predict the Winning Combin... [ More ]