if it took 10k

Reply #19

Coin Toss — Tue, 01 May 2018 04:57:35 GMT

Sometimes with such a question the why or why not is implied.

Reply #18

winoneday — Tue, 01 May 2018 04:17:23 GMT

My point is, very few people answered the question. Many people could not stay on topic.

Reply #17

EZMONEE — Tue, 01 May 2018 04:03:52 GMT

Lottery discussion

Reply #16

Stack47 — Tue, 01 May 2018 03:32:17 GMT

If yes or no was all they wanted, they could have used a poll.

Reply #15

winoneday — Mon, 30 Apr 2018 19:15:34 GMT

Interesting to note that very few people answered the question - yes or no.

Reply #14

Stack47 — Mon, 30 Apr 2018 05:36:06 GMT

Almost every system with minimal to no risk is just as hypothetical as making an imaginary $10,000 wager. The thing is not many lottery players make $100 wagers so there is nothing to relate to. Lots of people buy $10,000 worth of stock at minimal to no risk , but that's much different thing.

Reply #13

Soledad — Sun, 29 Apr 2018 03:52:07 GMT

Reply #12

Soledad — Sun, 29 Apr 2018 03:42:11 GMT

No. Because I wouldn t have $10,000 grand to spend on just the lottery. So I d have to figure a way to win $10,000 first from the lottery in order to try. So really I d be aiming to spend about a couple hundred.

Reply #11

winoneday — Sun, 29 Apr 2018 03:33:23 GMT

Yes

Reply #10

Lucky Loser — Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:01:43 GMT

Well, the key words here are 'the lottery' and the general answer will be different based on the size (number range) of the lottery in question. Specifics matter here. If you're talking $10K to win a given state's Cash 5-style lottery then, yes, it's definitely worth it providing that your timing and combinations are up to par. However, when you begin dealing with lottery games such as MM'S, PB, and even a states local lottery, $10K becomes 'not even' a drop in the bucket with best timing and co... [ More ]

Reply #9

Rook — Thu, 26 Apr 2018 21:56:14 GMT

If hypothetically there was no risk or even minimal risk then the lottery would be broken lol.

But anyway there have been cases of people spending way too much on a drawing (for their personal income) without allowing themselves to realize that their chances are still below 1% of winning the jackpot.

Desperation and/or certain neurological conditions can make it difficult for people to think rationally sometimes. They are not dumb or anything like that, but again just judgement can get c... [ More ]

Reply #8

Ziopic$ — Thu, 26 Apr 2018 18:43:48 GMT

If I had all of the money that I have gambled during my lifetime--I would gamble it again.

Reply #7

BobP — Thu, 26 Apr 2018 07:18:31 GMT

In my opinion it would take about $500 per draw and a good filtering software like Lotwin that begins with ALL the combinations and filters from there to have something of a possible chance in a typical Pick-6 game. 10k would mean 20 such chances. Impossible to say if that would be enough to get it done. PB MM forgetaboutit.

BobP

Reply #6

Coin Toss — Thu, 26 Apr 2018 04:19:18 GMT

freeze22,

There's no such thing as a lock and $10K is a really expensive way to learn that.

Reply #5

lottolaughs — Thu, 26 Apr 2018 03:44:06 GMT

No way. I'd take that to the casino and play the $5 or $10 slots. Much better chance to win something.

Reply #4

RJOh — Thu, 26 Apr 2018 01:14:56 GMT

If you're talking $10K then you're thinking about covering 5-10k combinations and so far no one has come close to reducing the odds of winning a jackpot to 1:10K.

Reply #3

zephbe — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 20:47:26 GMT

$10,000 is not minimal risk to me--so, no, I wouldn't spend it.

Reply #2

RJOh — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 17:24:07 GMT

That would be like matching 5+1 with a MADDOG MM or PB challenge using 10 WB an 4 bonus ball. If someone did that several times, I would spend the $2.016K to cover all 1008 possible combinations.

Reply #1

thamizhpayan — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 16:51:06 GMT

Risk is spending that 10k

if it took 10k

freeze22 — Wed, 25 Apr 2018 14:50:24 GMT

Lets say hypothetically speaking you found a way to win the lottery with minimal to no risk and it would take you 10k to do it, would you spend the 10k