Non-Mathematical tracking chart

Reply #18

lakerben — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:46:22 GMT

Reply #17

lotto15 — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 21:14:38 GMT

I would have to agree disagree with you. I have won 1800.00 within a 2 month period last year with numbers I predicted. I think alot of systems on LP work are worth looking at. I agree lottery numbers are random at times, but they also follow patterns. But you're never going to find that one system that works 100% everyday. Sure some systems are crazy some that make sense. So I appreciate everyone on here who tries to help.

Reply #16

lakerben — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 20:56:37 GMT

Wow ! Unless people just crawled out from underneath a rock I figure they can think for themselves.

Lol.

Reply #15

Tucker Black — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 20:37:57 GMT

LOL I don't work for the Lottery

In all seriousness, I don't want to see people waste their money on a book that has zero value to it. Lottery tickets are bad bets (but very convenient to play, and I do play occasionally for that reason). But at least you do win something, averaging about 50% to 70% of the wager, depending on the game.

If you buy a book telling you how to win the lottery, you are wasting 100% of your money on it. It is just as wasteful as sending cash to someone in Jamaica... [ More ]

Reply #14

lakerben — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 20:07:48 GMT

I'm amused that you still sign on and ramble on like a jealous member.

The p3 game is there to win. I spend the time and I win. I don't need to predict. Im betting for my self and i dont care for stupidity.. I don't go to the store concerning myself if I posted picks for eveyone to see, ridiculous! I've been playing for a long time and until I got on this site i never heard of anyone so obsessed with predictions??!

Sometimes i post for p3 ,p4 in the forms. I posted Ohio the other day and t... [ More ]

Reply #13

Stack47 — Sat, 23 Jun 2018 19:12:47 GMT

It does not change the fact that no system will EVER predict random numbers.

Because most systems are based on doing something to a seed number, the systems become primitive RNGs. Overtime any pick-3 system will average a match in 0.1% of the drawings. A few years ago a member asked on average how many times should the same three digits from the previous drawing over 30 years repeat and results were once in ever 1000 drawings . The point they were trying to make is regardless how a player co... [ More ]

Reply #12

bobby623 — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 13:25:43 GMT

Spoken by a highly paid Lottery official trying to minimize prize payouts

Reply #11

lakerben — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:48:21 GMT

You don't get it.

You should be playing bingo!

I'm off to work on tomorrow's games. I'm not wasting anymore time because time is $ money

Reply #10

Tucker Black — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:43:24 GMT

I agree, that is a trend. It doesn't mean the probability of 59 showing up again is any different.

Trends are in THE PAST. That is an important distinction, because you cannot buy tickets for past drawings. You can only buy tickets for future drawings, for which there are no trends, only probabilities.

Roll a die (a fair die to be exact) over and over and over. Eventually, you will get 2 four times in a row. What is the probability of getting 2 yet again? 1 in 6. Same as it was t... [ More ]

Reply #9

Tucker Black — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:37:02 GMT

You can think whatever you like (that is part of the fun). It does not change the fact that no system will EVER predict random numbers. It is not possible!

If mankind ever invents a working crystal ball: the lottery, the stock market, the real estate market (and plenty other markets) will completely cease operations.

Reply #8

lakerben — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:10:24 GMT

Wrong! If a method hits and the bettor cashes tickets that's the name of the game. I hit 5 times this week in pick 3.

I don't think random I think methods,systems,winning and cashing tickets.

Reply #7

lakerben — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:05:49 GMT

Study your game and you will win. Period. Nm has had 59 hit over and over. This is a trend.

Study different systems hot,,cold and you will win. I have many years of experience ,charts systems etc. If I gave into the random thing I wouldn't bet at all.

I'm always in the game. I spend time to keep on top of the trends. I cashed in more tickets today I don't think of random ,endless blabbing I'm in the game.

Reply #6

Tucker Black — Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:23:58 GMT

It doesn't matter whether you use numbers, letters, colored straws, or different shapes of rocks. All those methods are a complete waste of time. The lottery chooses winning numbers at RANDOM. They are as random as atmospheric noise, dice, cards, anything like that.

Trends in randomly chosen numbers do appear, but trends also appear at random. These trends can only be observed in the past, not the future.

Buy a quick pick or pick your own numbers from whatever source you like. Just don't s... [ More ]

Reply #5

bobby623 — Sat, 16 Jun 2018 17:52:09 GMT

Lotto Loser

Years ago when LP was a youngster, several members posted methods whereby the 10 digits (or, numbers, if you prefer) in a Pick 3 game were represented by the letters 'A' through 'J.'

None of those ideas (not ideals) caught on for three major reasons:

1. Too many possibilities.

2. No reliable 'triggers' or clues regarding potential good answers to the 'What's Next' questions.

3. No useful features that reflected game trends.

I would imagine the Alphabet Pick... [ More ]

Reply #4

Stack47 — Thu, 14 Jun 2018 03:26:28 GMT

Basically, he said only 'idiots' use non-mathematical schemes to analyze lottery history.

The System Forum is loaded with primitive not so random number generators and his I-book is no different. Bet if he compared his system to LP's Quick Picks Generator or the Words or Phrases generator they all get a 1 in 9 overall chance of winning a prize.

Reply #3

Lucky Loser — Wed, 13 Jun 2018 23:43:14 GMT

Bottom line - it's a 'to each his own' situation.

Agreed. Reading your methods just makes me really 'confurious' at times. This is my own word I constructed and have applied for a patent. If you Google this word, it will come up but it's comprised of the words confused and furious. My version combines confused and curious. Only minor changes are required to 'legally' create one's own patent.

In my opinion, just about every method posted here involves a great amount of mathematics, odds, p... [ More ]

Reply #2

bobby623 — Wed, 13 Jun 2018 00:22:02 GMT

Lucky Loser

Thanks for your critique.

My post was in support of a conversation I had with LA Igor, in the Jackpot Forum.

Basically, he said only 'idiots' use non-mathematical schemes to analyze lottery history.

I decided to give him a sample of my methods, which, he quickly brushed off.

He split a Fantasy 5 jackpot in California over a year ago and had a second win.

He used his winnings to write a book describing his mathematical-based methods which he claims are superior to an... [ More ]

Reply #1

Lucky Loser — Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:41:11 GMT

The point of this post is to show one advantage of a non-mathematical tracking chart derived using the power of substitution.

I personally don't understand why the same DIGITS AND MATH used to create all lottery games would even require being substituted by alphabets to be perfectly forthcoming, bobby. I'm not picking at you, either. It just seems like 'substituting' letters for numbers is creating twice the work to arrive at the same conclusion in the bigger scheme of things to me. In terms... [ More ]

Non-Mathematical tracking chart

bobby623 — Tue, 12 Jun 2018 01:33:58 GMT

If you are reading all of the information being posted in LP every day you have no doubt seen a variety of tracking charts.

A majority of the these charts reflect statistical data collected and organized according to some mathematical formula.

One shortcoming, in my opinion, these charts have is that the formula is rarely shown and explained. This often leads to numerous follow-up posts by folks who believe the charts could help them pick a winner but they need more information, which, by